1 / 112

Development of micro-tools for surgical applications

UNIVERSITE' PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE LABORATOIRE DE ROBOTIQUE DE PARIS. UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI GENOVA FACOLTA' DI INGEGNERIA. PHD THESIS EN COTUTELLE XVII CICLE. Development of micro-tools for surgical applications. 18 November 2005. SUPERVISORS: PROF. ING. Rinaldo MICHELINI

sandra_john
Télécharger la présentation

Development of micro-tools for surgical applications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UNIVERSITE' PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE LABORATOIRE DE ROBOTIQUE DE PARIS UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI GENOVA FACOLTA' DI INGEGNERIA PHD THESIS EN COTUTELLE XVII CICLE Development of micro-tools for surgical applications 18 November 2005 SUPERVISORS: PROF. ING. Rinaldo MICHELINI PROF. ING. Philippe BIDAUD STUDENT: Francesco CEPOLINA

  2. Index robotic surgery MEMS technologies modules design system integration

  3. Robotic surgery Robotic in-body equipment Active catheters Endoscopes Autonomous worms Navigating pills Remote-surgery environments Orthopaedic surgery Eye surgery Laparo/thorax-tomic surgery Surgical end-effectors

  4. Active catheters Tohoku University www.olympus.com Esashi catheter Olympus catheters

  5. Endoscopes 1 of 4 Hirose + Yoneda Robotics lab State of art Ikuta laboratory Endoscope tip Hirose and Ikuta endoscopes

  6. Endoscopes 2 of 4 ARTS lab Pisa arthroscope Paris 6 LRP intestinal endoscope

  7. Endoscopes 3 of 4 Dr. Gründler Swiss endoscope Pennsylvania State University Stanford Research Institute EPAM endoscopes

  8. Endoscopes 4 of 4 Imperial College of London Neuro-endoscopic operating instruments Grenoble University Laparotomic endoscope

  9. Autonomous worms 1 of 3 ARTS lab Katholieke Uneversiteit Leuven Leuven intestinal worm Pisa intestinal worm

  10. Autonomous worms 2 of 3 Katholieke Uneversiteit Leuven Leuven intestinal worm arms Korea worm Korea Institute of Science and Technology

  11. Autonomous worms 3 of 3 Korea Institute of Science and Technology Korea impulsive worm Korea centipede worm

  12. Navigating pills www.rfnorika.com The Norika 3 pill

  13. Robotic surgery Robotic in-body equipment Active catheters Endoscopes Autonomous worms Navigating pills Remote-surgery environments Orthopaedic surgery Eye surgery Laparo/thorax-tomic surgery Surgical end-effectors

  14. Robotic surgical systems

  15. Orthopaedic surgery Israel Institute of Technology NASA Jet Propulsion Lab Eye surgery

  16. Laparo/thorax-tomic surgery http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/ The da Vinci® surgery system

  17. Surgical end-effectors 1 of 4 The ZEUS® surgery tools http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/ da Vinci® surgery tools

  18. Surgical end-effectors 2 of 4 da Vinci® snake wrist http://www.intuitivesurgical.com Technical University of Lódz Poland surgery gripper

  19. Surgical end-effectors 3 of 4 Michigan State University College of Engineering Michigan surgery gripper German Aerospace Center, DLR German surgery gripper

  20. Surgical end-effectors 4 of 4 Warsaw University of Technology Poland sewing effector Daimler Benz German forceps

  21. 2DoF 4DoF 4DoF 5DoF 5DoF 5DoF Minimally invasive surgery: clamps F. Cepolina, R.C. Michelini, “"Robots in medicine: A survey of in-body nursing aids. Introductory overview and concept design hints."

  22. Index robotic surgery MEMS technologies modules design system integration

  23. MEMS technologies 1/4 PIEZOELECTRIC EFFECT Multilayer piezoelectric actuators Ultrasonic motor Inchworm piezoeletric motor ELECTROSTATIC FORCE Comb drive Rotating comb drive Wooble motor

  24. MEMS technologies 2/4 MAGNETO AND ELECTRO-STRICTIVE FORCE Electrostrictive actuators Elastomeric dielectric actuators Magnetostrictive actuators MAGNETO- AND ELECTRO- RHEOLOGICAL EFFECT SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS Actuators SMA ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD 1/2 Coreless DC motors

  25. MEMS technologies 3/4 ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD 2/2 Brushless DC motor Micro linear motor Stepper motor Micro stepper motor Solenoids Voice coil motor

  26. MEMS technologies 4/4 FLUID ACTUATION Bourdon pipe Artificial muscles THERMAL EXPANSION

  27. Index state of art MEMS technologies modules design system integration

  28. Modules design embodiment design commercial components detail design control Target 1 Improvement of arm dexterity

  29. Design process

  30. Technical problems Limited module size:  10 mm max (fixed by the trocar) L 30 mm max (fixed by thorax) Size Limited actuators power  block not active joints, use light material limited n° of modules, limited payload Machining Limited space available  use miniature screws, gluing, welding How to link modules together: mechanic, power, signal Operating theatre High precision and accuracy is required arm stiffness, error compensation Safety  force feedback, fast module retrieval, module reliability, modules compliance Control Redundant robot control  distributed logic, singularities avoidance, coordination with 2nd hand, sensor fusion, communication protocol Actuation ? Material ? Transmission ? Sensors ?

  31. Surgical articulated arm Vladimir Filaretov Instrument design In collaboration with: Prof. Vladimir Filaretov of Far Eastern State Technical University (Vladivostok)

  32. Arm with clutches TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Clutches are delicate • Precision machining is needed

  33. Self powered forearm TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Motors limit the arms power • Low dexterity

  34. Universal joint forearm TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Precision machining is needed

  35. Flexible joints forearm TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Disposition of the wires along the arm

  36. The forearms family

  37. Modules design embodiment design commercial components detail design control

  38. Torque needed for sewing Sewing torque 1,2 mNm Actuation Material Transmission Sensors

  39. Piercing 0.5 N Wire stretch 1 N Clamp 40 N Motor selection 1/2 Commercial miniature electric motors COMMENTS Penn States sells miniature (1.8 mm diam, 4 mm long) piezoelectric motors too expensive (3300 Euro/each) Actuation Material Transmission Sensors

  40. Motor selection 2/2 Actuation Material Transmission Sensors COMMENT Penn States piezo electric motors (1.8 mm diam, 4 mm long) are too expensive (3300 Euro/each)

  41. 8 mm F F Material selection Actuation Material Transmission Sensors 150 mm

  42. Components selection 3300 € 550 € 5 € 8 € 4 € 18 € Actuation Material Transmission Sensors

  43. Modules design embodiment design commercial components detail design control

  44. Index Detail design 1 DOF modules 2 DOF modules End effectors Final solution

  45. 1DOF modules 1/5 TECHNICAL PROBLEM • The face gear is not feasible • Link between the orange gear and the pink part • Low torque OVERALL L 17.5mm (motor l 1.5mm) GEAR RATIO 0.625

  46. 1DOF modules 2/5 TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Multipole magnet offers low resolution • Multipole magnet is costly • The magnet is difficult to assemble • Low torque

  47. 1DOF modules 3/5 TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Consider undercutting for gear design • The gear, if magnetic, is difficult to machine • Low torque Detail design Given for machining

  48. 1DOF modules 4/5 TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Optic wires along the arm • This face gear is not machinable • Low torque

  49. 1DOF modules 5/5

  50. 1DOF modules family: PROBLEM • Low torque • Too long • Big gear PROBLEM • Low torque • Face gear not machin. PROBLEM • Low torque • Face gear not machin. • Sensor gives low resolution PROBLEM • Low torque • The magnetic gear is not machin. PROBLEM • Low torque • The gear is not machin. • Cabling problems

More Related