1 / 7

Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium 29 November 2006

Program Executive Office Space Systems. Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium 29 November 2006. Statement C: Distribution Limited to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (29 November 2006) PEO-SS-06-0014. CLASSIFICATION (U) Classified by: PMW-146.

sandra_john
Télécharger la présentation

Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium 29 November 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Program Executive Office Space Systems Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium 29 November 2006 Statement C: Distribution Limited to U.S. Government Agencies and their contractors (29 November 2006) PEO-SS-06-0014 CLASSIFICATION (U) Classified by: PMW-146 Mr. Bryan ScurryDirector of Operations For Official Use Only (FOUO)

  2. NSSAP 03-01 NarrowbandPrograms Narrowband Capability NSSO NSS JPEOJTRS SPAWAR PEOSPACE SYSTEMS STRATCOM ASN RDA USD ATL LEASAT UFO MUOS LEASAT NETWAR-COM SMC/LREELV EELV JTRSTERMINALS N6 UFO MUOS NSA MJPO USecAF DoDTELEPORT DISATELEPORT NSS COORDINATION NAVY SPACE LEADERSHIP NAVY SPACE INTERESTS PEO Space Systems MISSION STATEMENTDevelop and deploy flexible and seamless narrowband communication space systems that optimize Naval, Joint, Agency, Allied, Coalition operations, and coordinate Department of the Navy space research, development, and acquisition activities. *PEO Space is triple-hatted, also fulfilling Commander SSFA and NRO Communications Director leadership roles Unclassified

  3. SPAWARSpaceFieldActivity PEOSpaceSystems NROCommuni-cationsDirectorate SSFA Enterprise Support Providing personnel who leverage White/Blackworld program acquisitions to achieve optimized space “best practices” across the space system life-cycle in support of the Joint Warfighter. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTSACQUISITIONEDUCATION / S&T / R&DOPERATIONS ODNI Requirements DNRO N2 Joint Service Requirements USA/ USN/ USAF/USMC USCG Acquisition DNI/ DNRO USD ATL ASN RDA COMSPAWAR PEOs SPAWARSpaceFieldActivity NSS NRO NSSO MJPO GBS JPO Science & Technology CNR NRL NPGS Operations STRATCOM COCOMs CFFC NNWC Unclassified

  4. PEO Space Systems and the GIG MUOS is born interoperable utilizing JTRS and Teleport Air Force C2 Constellation FIOP SIAP Sea Strike, Sea Shield, Sea Basing SIGP/SIMP TCS Navy / Marine Corps FORCEnet Joint C2 Joint C2 (JC2) Teleport MUOS Army LANDWARNET JTRS GIG-BE USCG Deepwater DCGS JISR Coalition Interagency Net Centricity and FORCEnet are an Inherently Joint/Coalition Concept, Relying on Systems such as MUOS to Provide Essential Capabilities to the Joint/Coalition Community and Other Services and Agencies Unclassified

  5. MUOS – Military UHF GEO Mobile System Legacy UHF System and Frequency “Bent Pipe” satellite Retains DoD UHF investment MUOS WCDMA at UHF Legacy at UHF 36,000 km tall “cell tower” 3G Commercial Terrestrial WCDMA @ S-Band “Bent Pipe” Retains 3G UMTS integrated network topology Base Station Base Station Radio Network Control Core Network Base Station Base Station Radio Network Control Core Network 3G Network 3G UMTS Network RAF SF/NMF What is MUOS? Unclassified

  6. Risk Management Process MUOS Acquisition CONOPS • NSSAP 03-01 Acquisition Policy • Requirement and Funding Stability • Government-Industry Teaming • Mission Success Orientation – Contract Awards & Incentives, and Milestone Payment • Risk Management Process Unclassified

  7. 100% 100% 99% 100% 93% Cum % of Total Cost Cum % of Total Fee 90% 81% 80% 75% 70% 62% 60% 50% 50% 41% 40% 35% 30% 30% 20% 15% 13% 10% 5% 0% Fee ($M) 11 24 36 26 20 58 60 Total Fee Possible = $235M 70 60 IPF ($33M) MSF ($53M) 50 Award Fee ($74M) Cost Fee ($75M) 33 37 40 30 16 7 12 20 16 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 11 17 2 20 10 17 14 10 9 9 4 1 0 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 MUOS Contract Structure • Contract provides Mission Success boundaries that enable the Contractor to “trade” cost, schedule and performance to achieve optimal Mission Success • Contractor incentivized throughout performance to deliver fully compliant MUOS on schedule and at cost • A Creative Incentive Structure & Unique Clauses Empower Contractors responsibilities • The Contractor, not PM, manages cost control and interim schedule. • The Contract, not PM or PCO, controls > 80% of Mission Success Fee/Profit. • The Contract encourages wise use of COTS vs. development. • The Structure Minimizes OA - “Requirements Creep” complex Unclassified

More Related