1 / 42

Open Charm and Charmonium Production: First Results from LHCb

Open Charm and Charmonium Production: First Results from LHCb. Zhenwei YANG @ Tsinghua Univ. on behalf of the LHCb collaboration. 21-24, October, 2010 IHEP, Beijing, China. Outline. Physics ambition of LHCb LHCb detector Physics interests on charm

sauda
Télécharger la présentation

Open Charm and Charmonium Production: First Results from LHCb

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Open Charm and Charmonium Production: First Results from LHCb Zhenwei YANG @Tsinghua Univ. on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 21-24, October, 2010 IHEP, Beijing, China

  2. Outline • Physics ambition of LHCb • LHCb detector • Physics interests on charm • First results on charmonium and open charm • Summary and perspectives

  3. ➢ Success running in 2009 @ 2.36 TeV ➢ first collision @ 7 TeV on March 30 ➢ Integrated Lumi ~ ?? pb-1 (?? Oct, 2010) Geneva CERN LHC Tunnel

  4. 730 members 54 institutes 15 countries

  5. Physics Aims of LHCb “dedicated to heavy flavour physics at the LHC” • New PhysicsCP violation: precision measurements of CKM anglesrare decay of beauty and charm hadrons • Heavy Flavour PhysicsB productionBc , b-baryon physicscharm decays (e.g. D-mixing)tau lepton flavour violation......

  6. bb production at LHC • bb pair production correlated • σbb ~ 300-500 µb (@7-14 TeV) • 15<<300 mrad, unique acceptance • Luminosity limits to ~21032 cm-2s-1 • Maximize probability of a single interaction per crossing • 2fb-1 per nominal year(107s), ~1012bb pairs pear year 

  7. LHCbDetector μ+ beam 2 beam 1 μ- b hadron Muon System (M1-M5) μ-id： e(mm) ~94(97) %, mis-id: e (pm) ~ 3(2) % Silicon strip detector σx/y ~ 10(15.5) μm σz ~ 60(91) μm σIP ~ 21(25) μm @2GeV/c Tracking System (TT,T1-T3) Efficiency ~ 95(94.3)% Ghost ~ 5(7.7)% Δp/p~ 0.5(0.55)%(long tracks) *long tracks: tracks passing trough VELO,TT,T1-T3

  8. LHCb Data Taking to be updated to be updated • Stable data taking with high efficiency in all systems, • globallyincreasing with time.

  9. Detectors’ Efficiency • Extremely high efficiency for all subdetectors

  10. Physics Interests on Charm 1) J/ cross-section (and polarization) • Production mechanism still not well understood, theoretical interests on direct J/ • Three main sources of J/1) Direct J/2) Decay from heavier charmonium3) Decay from b-hadrons • fractions of heavier charmonia are helpful 2) Essentially related to many investigations of CP violation and rare decay 3) Understanding of charm is fundamental for later analysis Prompt J/ J/from b

  11. Measurement of J/ cross section • Cross section(both prompt J/ and J/ from b) • Separate “prompt J/” from “J/ from b” by fitting pseudo-proper time tz • σ( incl. J/) • σ( J/ from b)

  12. Measurement of J/ cross section • good approximation of average b lifetime • well described by exponential distribution

  13. Event Selection of J/ Data Sample • (14.15 ± 1.42) nb-1 (low pile-up conditions) Event selection • 2 muons • with fully reconstructed tracks (VELO + Tracker) • identified bymuon system • good vertex reconstructed • pT > 700 MeV/c • Mass window for signal definition: (MJ/ψ± 390) MeV/c2 • Trigger L0 • single muon, pT > 480 MeV/c • HLT: • single muon, pT > 1.3 GeV/c .OR. muon pair with Mμμ > 2700 MeV/c2

  14. Mass fit Signal: Crystal Ball function Background: 1st order polynomial Fit results (2.5<y<4, pT<10 GeV/c): Signal = 2872 ± 73 S/B = 1.3 μ= (3088 ± 0.4) MeV/c2 σ = (15.0 ± 0.4) MeV/c2

  15. tz Fit Result χ2/ndof=1.6 1)Background from invariant mass sidebands 2)Crosscheck with a binned fit gives consistent results

  16. Efficiencies: ε = εacc x εrec x εtrig • 0<PT<10 GeV/c divided into 10 bins • integrate over 2.5<y<4 due to low statistics • plenty of cross check with data

  17. Total Efficiency and Polarization Effect • ε depends strongly on polarization • treated as systematic errors for first data With more statistics, a direct measurement of polarization with full angular analysis, in different reference frames and bins of y and pT, is foreseen.

  18. Preliminary Results Systematic errors mainly come from data/MC discrepancy. Dominant contributions from trigger and tracking efficiencies. Extrapolations with PYTHIA 6.4 (LEP hadronization fractions assumed)

  19. More Data • Much more data since ICHEP several 100k events/pb-1 • Will measure also polarization • Region of measurement (y, pT) will be extended with more data, some overlap to CMS/ATLAS

  20. Heavier Charmonia (2s)μ+μ- • ccJ/y(mm) g 1)Also seen hints of X(3872). 2)With more statistics, we will measure (c1+c2)/(J/) separately for prompt c and c from b, and measure cross section of (2S). DM = M (J/yg) - M(J/y) (2s)J/

  21. Open Charm D0→ K-p+ D*+→ (D0→K-p+ )p+ D+→K-p+p+ Ds→ (f→K-K+)p+

  22. Open charm cross section

  23. Open charm cross section

  24. Open charm cross section

  25. Open charm cross section

  26. Open charm cross section • First measurement at √s=7 TeV. • Measure cross section vs y, pT in ~2 nb-1, with open trigger. • Good agreement with expectations! • Extrapolating to all pT and 4p can also • confirm the expectation on ratio at √s=7TeV • s(pp→ccX) ≈ 20 x s(pp→bbX) •  Good news for LHCb charm program

  27. Measurement of (D+)/(Ds+) Consistent with PDG: 3.080.70

  28. Summary and Perspectives • LHCb producing physics quality measurements • Cross sections of prompt J/ and J/ from b measured separately • Cross sections of D0,D*,D+,Ds are measured, good agreement with theor. expectations • Heavier charmoniawell reconstructed and waiting for more statistics • (bb) determined in forward region @ 7 TeV

  29. Thank you

  30. back up

  31. Measurement of σ(pp → bbX) Idea: using B→D0Xμν measure right-sign D0 μ- pairs using tracks not pointing at primary vertex, but which form a common vertex Example: only mode used • From PDG • b in B±/B0/Bs/b-baryon admixture →D0 l νX :BR = 6.82% ±0.35% • Br(D0 → K π) = (3.91 ± 0.01)% production fractions taken from Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (LEP) D0 mesons produced are not only produced in B-decays - but also “prompt”

  32. Measurement of σ(pp → bbX) Using log(IP) to separate direct D-meson and D meson from b Open (microbias trigger): 2.9 nb-1 RS Prompt from B WS Muon (1 Muon) trigger: 12.2 nb-1

  33. Measurement of σ(pp → bbX) σ( pp → Hb X, 2 < η(Hb) < 6) = 75.3 ± 5.4 ± 13 μb Extrapolation: total bb production cross section at √s = 7 TeV σ( pp → bbX) = 284 ± 20 ± 49 μb (assuming LEP frag. fractions)

  34. LHCbDetector (2) μ+ beam 2 beam 1 b hadron μ- RICH1&RICH2 π/Kid： e(KK) ~95(96) %， mis-id ~ 5(7) %， ECAL:s(E)/E= 10% E-1/2 1 % (E in GeV) HCAL: s(E)/E= (695)% E-1/2 (9  2) % (E in GeV)

  35. Measurement of J/ cross section • Cross section(both prompt J/ and J/ from b) • Separate “prompt J/” from “J/ from b” by fitting pseudo-proper time tz • σ( incl. J/) • σ( J/ from b)

  36. Open charm cross-sections • Extrapolating to all pT and 4p can also • confirm the expectation on ratio at √s=7TeV • s(pp→ccX) ≈ 20 xs(pp→bbX) •  Good news for LHCb charm program

  37. Open charm (D0,D*,D+,Ds) cross-sections • First measurement at √s=7 TeV. • Measure cross section vs y, pT in ~2 nb-1, with open trigger. • Impact parameter distribution used to separate prompt D0,+,D+, Ds from secondary. • Good agreement with expectations! Ds D+

  38. Data Set of J/ (1)

  39. Data Set of J/ (2)

  40. Selections of D0 & D* D0→ K-p+ and D*+→ (D0→K-p+ )p+ K,p : c2(track)/DoF < 9 c2(IP) > 9 pT > 700 MeV/c K : DLL(K-p) > p : DLL(K-p) D0 : c2(vertex) <9 c2(flight) > 16 c2(IP) < 9 q < 12 mrad K,p : c2(track)/DoF < 10 K,pD : c2(IP) > 9 K : DLL(K-p) > 0 p : DLL(p-K) > 0 D0 : c2(vertex) <9 ct > 90 mm c2(IP) < 9 D*+ : c2(vertex)< 9

  41. Selections of D+ and Ds D+→K-p+p+ and Ds→ (f→K-K+)p+ K,p : Prob(c2(track)) > 10-4 pT > 200 MeV/c p > 3.2 GeV/c c2(IP) > 3.0 2 daugthters: pT > 400 MeV/c c2(IP) > 10 1 daughter: c2(IP) > 50 K : DLL(K-p) > 3.3 p : DLL(p-K) > -10 D+ : c2(vertex) <8 q < 14 mrad • c2(flight) > 90 • t < 0.01 ns K,p:c2(track)/DoF<4 K : c2(IP) > 2 p : c2(IP) > 10 K : DLL(K-p) > 9 p : DLL(p-K) > -2 f : |DM|<20MeV/c2 Ds : c2(vertex)/DoF<5 Ds : c2(flight)> 67

  42. Measurement of J/ cross section • Cross section(both prompt J/ψ and J/ψ from b) • Measurements restricted to: 2.5<y J/ψ <40<pT J/ψ <10 GeV/c because of the small statistics available • Results on: • dσ/dpT ( incl. J/ψ) in 10 bins of pT J/ψ , 0<pT J/ψ <10 • σ( incl. J/ψ) • σ( J/ψ from b)

More Related