1 / 17

CZECH IMPLEMENTATION OF M I FID ( Investor Protection )

CZECH IMPLEMENTATION OF M I FID ( Investor Protection ). Conference on Implementation o f MiFID Split – 15 June 2007. Jan Šovar Ministry of Finance.

saul
Télécharger la présentation

CZECH IMPLEMENTATION OF M I FID ( Investor Protection )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CZECH IMPLEMENTATION OF MIFID(Investor Protection) Conference on Implementation of MiFID Split – 15 June 2007 Jan Šovar Ministry of Finance

  2. The Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, as a matter of policy, disclaims responsibility for any private publication or statements by any of its employees. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry or of the author’s colleagues on the staff of the Ministry. DISCLAIMER Jan Sovar

  3. Transposition status Process of the transposition Client classification (eligible counterparties) Best execution Transaction reporting Passporting Home - Host Minimum standard for the mandate and powers Agenda Jan Sovar

  4. Transposition status • Czech Republic • 31 January 2007 – deadline for MiFID transposition was not met • no Article 4 notifications made • 1 November 2007: application date for firms and Member States • A questionnaire-based survey of the COM Jan Sovar

  5. Process of the transposition • 03/2006 • Project Group at the Ministry • Work program 2006-2007 • 03-12/2006 • Analyses of discrepancies and deficiencies • Consultative working groups • Draft and release of consultation papers (CP) Jan Sovar

  6. Process of the transposition • Publications of Consultation Papers • CP on Conduct of Business Rules (09/2006) • CP on Market Infrastructure (11/2006) • CP on Scope and Definitions (11/2006) • CP on Organisational Requirements (12/2006) Jan Sovar

  7. Process of the transposition • 1st drafting of the legislation (12/2006 -03/2007) • CWGs – round tables • Intra-Ministry Consultation • 2nd drafting of the legislation (re-draft) (04-05/2007) • Extra-Ministry Consultation • Some conceptual rifts Jan Sovar

  8. Process of the transposition • Submission to the Government (06/2007) • Endorsement of the Government (summer/autumn) • Parliament (House of Deputies, Senate) • Simultaneous work of CNB on the secondary legislation (2007) Jan Sovar

  9. How do we protect investors? • Eligible counterparties – no nanny approach • Investor need to receive sufficient information to make informed decisions • Retail client agreements • But information is not enough. Firms should always act in the best interest of their clients • Strict limits on inducements • Management of conflicts of interest • KYC rules • Best execution • Safeguarding of client assets • Differentiation between retail and professional client Jan Sovar

  10. Source: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/securities/docs/isd/dir-2004-39-implement/dir-backgroundnote_en.pdf Background note Choice of client classification Jan Sovar

  11. Best execution • take all reasonable steps to obtain the best possible result for its client when executing an order, taking into account a number of specified factors and any other consideration relevant to the execution of the order; • establish and implement effective arrangements for complying with the above requirement, including the creation of an order execution policy; • provide appropriate information about the policy to its clients and obtain their consent to it; and • monitor the effectiveness of its order execution arrangements and policy. Jan Sovar

  12. Commission’s view – best execution will only apply in dealer markets where the firm is action on client’s behalf when executing an order CESR feedback on best execution – CP Best execution Jan Sovar

  13. Maintain or tune upthe current transaction reporting regime Shape of CESR Level 3 guidelines To which authority do branches make their transaction reports? Firm’s option, all transaction can be reported to the host authority only Scope of the reporting obligation Interim solution, regulators are allowed to collect reports of the client facing as well as market facing CESR will launch a review after 12 months Transaction reporting Jan Sovar

  14. Who’s responsible for oversight of investment business done by a branch with clients outside the host jurisdiction? Not to leave gaps in consumer protection Interpretation of Art 32 (7) of the MiFID Essential the CNB is able adequately to oversee branch’s activities within the Czech territory CESR CP on the Passport under MiFID Passporting: Home & Host Jan Sovar

  15. Minimum standards for the mandate and powers • Setting minimum standards for the mandate and powers that national competent authorities must have at their disposal and establishing effective mechanisms for real-time cooperation in investigating and prosecuting breaches of the rules. Jan Sovar

  16. Future efforts (?) • To enhance the level of represention of retail investors’ voice in Europe • To streamline current ombudsman schemes and compensation schemes across member-states • To develop adequeate qualification of investors and correlation to categories of products Jan Sovar

  17. Thank you for your attention ! jan.sovar@mfcr.cz orjan.sovar@yahoo.co.uk Jan Sovar

More Related