1 / 24

Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC) Threats to the New Zealand Economy

Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC) Threats to the New Zealand Economy. Dr Roger Cook Assistant Director (Science) & Principal Adviser (Microbiology). Threats via Where?. Absenteeism or Trade?. Absenteeism 90-100 notified cases a year (c.w. campylobacteriosis)

seanna
Télécharger la présentation

Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STEC) Threats to the New Zealand Economy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shiga Toxin-ProducingE. coli (STEC)Threats to the New Zealand Economy Dr Roger Cook Assistant Director (Science) & Principal Adviser (Microbiology)

  2. Threats via Where? Absenteeism or Trade? • Absenteeism • 90-100 notified cases a year (c.w. campylobacteriosis) • Small threat, more so if a serious outbreak • Trade (Primary threat) • Not disregarding human health • Not one case attributed to NZ beef or veal • Primarily lost trade in beef

  3. Net exporter

  4. 27% of $20b = $4b

  5. 29% of $6b = $1.7b

  6. 58% of $1.7b = $1b Worthy of protection

  7. Potted History STECs & E. coli O157:H7 • 1982 O157 first detected in the United States • 1976 O26 in NZ beef in Canada • Dr Karl Bettleheim, Heather Brooks, ESR, USDA-ARS – STECs common (not O157) • 1991 MIRINZ O157:H7 proposal to HRC • No bodies, no funding • 1993 cases reported in NZ • 1993 …

  8. Incident that Changed History + 1993 + E. coli O157:H7 + undercooking = Big Trouble US industry not under adequate control

  9. MegaReg (United States) Pathogen Reduction HACCP Rule 1995 • Mandatory (1997) • E. coli biotype 1 testing (faecal contamination) • Sanitation standard operating procedures + ZFT • Salmonella testing (FSIS) • Decontamination interventions • E. coli O157 in ground beef (FSIS) • Commercial (1998) with a subtle FSIS push • E. coli O157:H7 • Assurances for raw materials

  10. MegaReg (Imports) NZ view: Imposed, without a risk-basisTheir problem, not ours!! • SSOPs • New Zealand GHP and MAF Manuals • Microbiological monitoring • Extensive since 1965, and NMD • Salmonella testing (never on carcasses) • Not an O157 problem in New Zealand • Low number human cases • 2900 beef carcasses negative • DON’T need decontamination (>$$$)

  11. Barriers to trade : Pre WTO Technical Barriers Tariff Barriers

  12. Barriers to trade : GATT GATT removed tariff barriers, but technical barriers remained

  13. Barriers to trade : WTO SPS WTO SPS Agreement + Codex Standards = Risk basis = Trade parity for New Zealand

  14. O157 Equivalence We fought, we lost • Commercial, not FSIS • Avoided SPS risk requirement • Importers terrified of a recall • But then we won … • Our own bulk meat E. coli O157:H7 (1998) programme acceptable to MICA. Daily testing, all US–listed premises • National database • Did avoid decontam. interventions • Huge cost saving

  15. Reasonably Unlikely to Occur Composite analyses positive (4y) • If all five in a composite positive • Just 2/28,430 tests (0.01%) • If just one in a composite positive • Just 2/142,151 cartons (0.002%) • One test positive = 1 days production lost to the US market

  16. Twist-in-the Tale Setback - Bobby veal (2003) • FSIS ground beef detection • NZ bobby veal • How? Historically retorted. Changing use. Boutique low fat burgers from trim from table cuts. • Accidental findings in NZ • Protection of adult beef trade • NMD profile worse • Separate O157:H7 programme • Decontamination interventions implemented

  17. 1998-2007 Negligible Prevalence Composite analyses positive • Adult beef • 18/63,275 tests (0.04%) • 18/316,275 cartons (0.002%) • Bobby calf • 815/29,854 tests (2.73%) • Same as US beef • Small proportion going to ground beef

  18. A New Environment (2007-2008) The year from …. • US lost control of theirE. coli O157 • New requirements (again for imports) • Increased border testing and recall • New regulatory raw material testing (pre-test) • Increased sample number • Increased sample size and surface • Increased method sensitivity • Non-toxigenic isolates now deemed positive • Increased corrective action review and escalated testing.

  19. Risk to New Zealand Border Testing • Microbiological separation of lots • A container tests positive • All product from any processing day in that container is affected • Split shipments – subsequent and PRECEDING • Recall of product already in the US, perhaps processed • Untenable to US importers and NZ exporters. • Trade ceased temporarily BUT for what risk?

  20. Risk to New Zealand Top level negotiations – risk mitigated • FSIS agreed to: • O157 is of negligible prevalence (beef, not bobby) • A container is a separate unit. Only product from a single days prod’n tested (mixed days in container) • Only product in that container from that day affected • N60 to be implemented in NZ, and PFGE profiles to FSIS to facilitate attribution to NZ • But still a huge risk • Every detection in the US raises flags • Bobbies?

  21. Risk to New Zealand Amended NZ Monitoring programme • Risk of more detections? • More samples • Greater sample size • Counting atoxigenic isolates • Bobbies? • Too soon to tell

  22. NZFSA Performance Target E. coli O157:H7 prevalence in bobby veal • Reduce by 50% by 2012.

  23. Research (NZ Context) • Source attribution (molecular) • Primary reservoir • Transmission pathways on farm • Changing husbandry • Herd homes • Transportation • Effect of processing and inspection • Decontamination • Optimisation • Ozone • Bacteriophage • Refrigeration • Method validation & molecular typing

  24. Conclusion • No evidence of a risk of NZ beef or bobby veal to human health in NZ and the US. • Fingers crossed • Strategies in place • Testing requirements and actions on detection are economically onerous and threaten beef exports. • Recently advised initiatives from the US further threaten the $1b US beef export market. • Offal type muscle meats • Primal (table) cuts • Non-O157 STECs • Research (attibution and control) imperative

More Related