'Counterexample' diaporamas de présentation

Representation of Kleene Algebra with Tests

722 views • 60 slides

Model Checking with Proofs and Counterexamples

Model Checking with Proofs and Counterexamples. Anvesh Komuravelli Carnegie Mellon University. Joint work with Arie Gurfinkel , Sagar Chaki , and Edmund Clarke. Safety of Programs. Safe + Proof. Automatic verification for assertion failures. Program P + Safety Assertions.

674 views • 60 slides

541 views • 47 slides

479 views • 47 slides

473 views • 47 slides

Stefan Felsner

Stefan Felsner. A graph G is planar if it can be drawn on the plane with no crossing edges. planar graph G. planar embedding of G. Used as a starting point to find nice pictures of non-planar graphs:. Map 4-colouring:. Codeguru. Linear time algorithms for embedding :.

507 views • 29 slides

Revisit Shortest Path

345 views • 20 slides

345 views • 19 slides

Conditional Statements, Converse, and Counterexamples

267 views • 13 slides

1.1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning

1.1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning. Geometry Mrs. Blanco. Objectives:. Find and describe patterns. Use inductive reasoning to make real-life conjectures. Ex. 1: Describing a Visual Pattern. 1)Sketch the next figure in the pattern. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5. 6.

208 views • 12 slides

R e l a t i o n s h i p s A m o n g St a t e m e n t s

R e l a t i o n s h i p s A m o n g St a t e m e n t s. MM1G2.b. Understand and use the relationships among a statement and its converse, inverse, and contrapositive . BY: BETH MATHIS Terry Marshall Jr. . In Our Own Words.

232 views • 11 slides

1.3 vocab

1.3 vocab. Counterexample. disproves a theory. Right angle. 90 degrees. Acute angle. l ess than 90 degrees. Obtuse angle. g reater than 90 degrees. Vertical angles. o pposite angles. Linear pair of angles. two angles on the same line. Complementary angles.

222 views • 9 slides

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning - . Reasoning that is based on patterns that your observe. Conjecture - . A conclusion you reach using inductive reasoning. Counterexample - . A conclusion you reach using inductive reasoning. Your Turn:.

313 views • 8 slides

Lesson 2.1 AIM: Conditional Statements

Lesson 2.1 AIM: Conditional Statements. DO NOW: Find a counterexample. The sum of two numbers is always greater than either of the two numbers being added. -2 + -3 = -5. A conditional statement is composed of a hypothesis and a conclusion. Write as a conditional statement.

168 views • 8 slides

80 views • 7 slides

58 views • 5 slides