'Standard form categorical syllogism' diaporamas de présentation

Move Over, Monty Python: Tim and Jim's Argument Clinic Is Here!

318 views • 31 slides

Logic

Logic. HUM 200 Categorical Syllogisms. Lectures taken from Copi, I., & Cohen, C. (2009). HUM200: Introduction to logic: 2009 custom edition (13 th ed.) . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Objectives. When you complete this lesson, you will be able to:

632 views • 29 slides

Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism

Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism. 5 th Meeting. Deduction. One of the two major types of argument traditionally distinguished, the other being induction.

171 views • 12 slides

5 Categorical Syllogisms

86 views • 6 slides

COM 362 FULL COURSE DISCUSSIONS GCU

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course: https://www.tutorialsexperts.com/product/com-362-full-course-discussions-gcu/ COM 362 TOPIC 1 DQ 1 Aristotle described argumentation as the following: u201cFor to a certain extent all men attempt to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves, and to attack others.u201d Aristotleu2019s description of argumentation represents his view of how argumentation is a part of who we are as human beings. Do you agree or disagree with Aristotleu2019s viewpoint? Explain why. How has his viewpoint played a significant role in the historical development of argumentation? COM 362 TOPIC 1 DQ 2 Find a blog that presents and defends an argument within one of its posts. Write a paragraph evaluating the arguments as either inductive or deductive. Provide the blog link in your paragraph response. Why do you think identifying these different elements in an argument is important? COM 362 TOPIC 2 DQ 1 When watching or reading the news, what fallacies do you see people make most often in their arguments? COM 362 TOPIC 2 DQ 2

35 views • 3 slides

COM 362 TOPIC 7 DISCUSSIONS GCU

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course: https://www.tutorialsexperts.com/product/com-362-topic-7-discussions-gcu/ COM 362 TOPIC 7 DQ 1 Research an argument in the realm of apologetics and evaluate the syllogism given (e.g., the transcended argument for the existence of God). Translate the argument into a standard-form categorical syllogism with a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that contains a major term (predicate) and a minor term (subject). Make certain the major term, minor term, and middle term are connected by an affirmative or negative copula that uses u201cto beu201d verbs (e.g., is, are, am, was, were, be, been, being) in both premises and the conclusion. COM 362 TOPIC 7 DQ 2 Find an argument against a position you hold. This can be in the realm of politics, religion, art, etc. Identify the form of the argument and state whether it is valid or invalid. Then, provide a response.

19 views • 1 slides