1 / 4

Overall detector performance Working Group

Overall detector performance Working Group. This is an electronic transcription of the slide presented as an introduction to the discussion. Overall detector performance WG. Common language.

seda
Télécharger la présentation

Overall detector performance Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overall detector performance Working Group This is an electronic transcription of the slide presented as an introduction to the discussion Discussion Overall detector performance WG P. Gay

  2. Overall detector performance WG • Common language Reconstruction data model included in the general/common framework coordinated by simulation people i.e. Ties Behnke & Franck Gaede Next month Before end of 02 • Collect the existent developments • Make them public available • Fill the missing holes • Welcome new comers • Go ahead to Amsterdam involving different sub-detectors e.g. Tracking, EFLOW, Flavor ID First Intermediate meeting Early beginning of January 03 MINI-WORKSHOP Very Short Term Priorities Following data model presc. and feed back to Franck & al. Full list of items on Web page Discussion Overall detector performance WG P. Gay

  3. A preliminary list of items we may discuss during this Mini-Workshop • Reconstruction data model (improvements, feed back to simulation people) • Status of what exists (enlarge the vision e.g. CMS, Belle VTX algo. As commented during this session) • How to make them public available if not yet (time scale, effort needed, performances, contents, algorithms involved, detector based on, …) • How to move to a or a various event reconstruction packages merging tracking reconstruction w/ ‘eflow’ reconstruction clusters, include ID flavor (missing pieces, foreseen improvements, effort needed, what one side need from other sub-detectors, e.g. hits information from back track interaction not coming from IP, as commented during this session) • What are the benchmark processes we want to exam at first priority (Which key numbers) • How we intent to perform the comparisons and share the work. • Comparisons to test the various sub-detectors options, test the sub-detectors parameters in a whole detector context e.g. numbers of layers, pad size, VTX techno, added options, TPC geometry, Quad position, … Discussion Overall detector performance WG P. Gay

  4. Anyway, have a look on Overall detector performance WG Web page on ECFA-DESY Site http://alephwww.cern.ch/~gaypas/ECFADESY/frontpage.html Discussion Overall detector performance WG P. Gay

More Related