1 / 15

By Dr. Julius Kiiza, Dept of Political Science, Makerere University Email: juliuskiiza@yahoo

Deepening Integration: The Political Economy of Regionalism in East Africa IDEAs Workshop, Nairobi 21 - 27 Jan 2007. By Dr. Julius Kiiza, Dept of Political Science, Makerere University Email: juliuskiiza@yahoo.com. Introduction.

sef
Télécharger la présentation

By Dr. Julius Kiiza, Dept of Political Science, Makerere University Email: juliuskiiza@yahoo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Deepening Integration:The Political Economy of Regionalism in East Africa IDEAs Workshop, Nairobi21 - 27 Jan 2007 By Dr. Julius Kiiza, Dept of Political Science, Makerere University Email: juliuskiiza@yahoo.com

  2. Introduction • Purpose of this paper is to critically reflect on regional integration in East Africa • Focus will be on the key individual and institutional political economy actors; esp: • Contest between the “go-slow” & the “first-tracking” integrationists will be highlighted • Central argument:

  3. Central Argument • Integration should be deepened and hastened, given: • The enormous challenges posed by the harsh global political economy • The domestic developmental challenges esp the massive poverty (31% Uganda; 56% Kenya; over 50% Tanzania) • The shortfalls of our donor-driven PEAPs/PRSPs; and • The potential benefits of integration

  4. The Debates • Two major debates have emerged on regionalism: 1. Feasibility & the real or perceived benefits of regionalism 2. “Appropriate” pace or speed of integration • Theorists of globalization argue that: • Globalization has resulted in Ungovernable Markets • That Nation-States Need to Liberalize Domestic Markets • Regional Integration: Higher Level of Liberalized Domestic Mkts

  5. Globalization Theories …. • From perspective of Globalization Orthodoxy: • Purpose of Regionalism is: • To fit in the emerging free “global” markets • Attract FDI • Be “compliant” with WTO rules (on freer trade) • Adopt “global” “best practices: • Look! Every regional is integrating - ASEAN, EU, NAFTA

  6. Skeptical Viewpoint • Critics of the globalization orthodoxy urge caution • Critics do not oppose increased regionalism • Their contention is over the purpose • The claim is that: • Integration should serve to govern, not deepen globalization • But Why? Globalization has two faces, not one. • Beneficial to advanced (OECD) countries; & largely detrimental to poor commodity economies • Regionalism should “distort” free “global” markets for the benefit of cooperating member-states

  7. Skeptical Viewpoint … • ToT in international markets - unfavourable to developing countries • Thus, regionalism must enhance quality of exports • Attracting foreign K - esp FDI (not portfolio K) is important • Regionalism also promotes “economies of scale in international diplomacy”

  8. On the Pace of Integration • Again 2 major debates: • The “Go-Slow” Argument; and • The “Fast-Tracking” Strategy • The “Go-Slow” claim alleges that integration is like marriage • PLO Lumumba (2006) for example argues: “U cant meet a lady for 1st time and say: I love U, I need U, I want to marry U right now!” • 2nd Claim: Need for broad consultation

  9. The Fast-Tracking Initiative Argues: • Time is a scarce resource • Zeit ist Geld! • Globalization poses serious challenges calling for urgent action • WTO evolving into a Monster: Unity is Our Strength (as small economies) • Poverty - a serious problem (31% Uganda; 56% Kenya; over 50% Tanzania) • Our State officials typically move at snail’s pace • Nobody in their right mind asks a snail to go-slow • Conclusion: GET SERIOUS!

  10. Who Shd Get Serious - and How • The foll institutional political economy actors must get serious: • Our Presidents + Cabinet (Initiate policies) • Rotating President: Announces policy priorities • EALA Members: Our lawmakers • National Parliaments • Sectoral Committees • Elite Academics • Our bureaucrats/ Civil Servants • Donors? Development Partners??

  11. How Should the Actors Get Serious? • Rethink the dominant “trade theory” of integration • Revisit the contest btn trade theory and production economics theory • Address the fundamental question of “trade in what?” • An appropriate trade policy must be STRATEGIC

  12. Key Elements of Strategic Trade (and Industrial) Policy • Import of Capital goods is encouraged • Country or region-specific industrial policies • Promote selected priority industrial sectors • Export of raw materials is prohibited • Infant industry protection - is promoted • Build developmentalist institutions eg EADB, UDC, the railways, etc • Massive use of subsidies • Struggle for structural economic transformation from primary commodities to value added pdts

  13. Lessons from Successful Integration • The “go-slow” theorists point to EU as a model for African integration • This is erroneous • The best models for EA integration are: • German Unification - Bizmark • Unification of USA - 18th C • Unification of Japan - 19th C • Unification of Italy • CRITICISM: THE TIMES HAVE CHANGED

  14. Conclusion & The Way Forward • Integration is not an end in itself • It is a means to larger developmental goals • Global political economy is harsh • Poverty is a serious problem • Time is a scarce resource • Hence the need for deeper and faster economic integration • But this calls for economic integration and political union as joint objectives

  15. Thank You Ladies & Gentlemen I hope you enjoyed my Talk

More Related