1 / 12

Addressing Construction Impacts

Addressing Construction Impacts. IMHO…. Often given short shrift in NEPA documents. Preparers sometimes used generic or “canned” text. Fail to address context-specific issues. TA 6640.8A. Address potential adverse impacts of each alternative.

selene
Télécharger la présentation

Addressing Construction Impacts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Addressing Construction Impacts

  2. IMHO… • Often given short shrift in NEPA documents. • Preparers sometimes used generic or “canned” text. • Fail to address context-specific issues.

  3. TA 6640.8A • Address potential adverse impacts of each alternative. • Particularly air, noise, water, traffic, detours, safety, visual… • Address impacts of borrow or disposal of materials when they are important. • Identify appropriate mitigation measures.

  4. Noise • FHWA has issued Highway Construction Noise Handbook. • Available at Noise website. • Useful reference for NEPA and noise practitioners.

  5. Detours, Closures and Safety • Detours and closures can have severe adverse impacts. • May require additional projects on adjacent roadways. • Small businesses, non-motorized users and transit users often affected.

  6. Business Owners Are Elusive • They are often too busy to attend public meetings and open houses. • But if their businesses are disrupted, they are very vocal.

  7. They can go from quiet to…

  8. Lessons from T-REX • Not the dino. The big I-25 project in Denver. • Continuous, proactive outreach to the community and businesses. • Well-publicized closure and detour info. • Result: some griping, few truly loud complaints.

  9. Post-NEPA changes • Applicants need to consult with FHWA prior to ROW, PS&E and bid award. • Written reevaluation may be needed. • Mitigation changes may require re-opening consultation with resource agencies. • Need to ensure mitigation commitments carried through into specifications.

  10. Recommendations • Make sure construction impact section not just “canned” text. • Analysis should reflect site-specific conditions. • Attention should be paid to pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. • May need special outreach to business owners.

  11. Recommendations (cont.) • Make sure applicants are consulting with FHWA before requesting new approvals. • Prepare written reevaluations as needed. • Make sure mitigation still achievable and cost-effective. • Ensure mitigation included in specs. • Others?

  12. In summary, this isn’t what we want.

More Related