1 / 27

Simulations on the setup “Energy plus Transmutation”

Simulations on the setup “Energy plus Transmutation”. Mitja Majerle m ajerle@ujf.cas.cz. - can they predict the experimental results ?. Modelling of basic processes (microscopic scale). Experiments (macroscopic scale). Simulation codes. Models – particle interactions, transport

selia
Télécharger la présentation

Simulations on the setup “Energy plus Transmutation”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Simulations on the setup“Energy plusTransmutation” Mitja Majerle majerle@ujf.cas.cz - can they predict the experimental results ?

  2. Modelling of basic processes (microscopic scale) Experiments (macroscopic scale) WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  3. Simulation codes • Models – particle interactions, transport • Cross-section libraries • Problem setup • Particles, processes can be followed WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  4. Simulations, how/what we calculate • MCNPX code v. 2.4.0 Input : • setup geometry • starting conditions • neutron distribution • Cross-section libraries (Au, Al - ENDF; Bi - experimental; Iodine - ?) • masses of produced elements or B-values WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  5. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  6. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  7. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  8. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  9. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  10. Control detectors for studying the setup - with (n,g) we study LE neutrons (flat part) – odd numbers -(n,4n) threshold is 23 MeV – even numbers WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  11. ENERGY + TRANSMUTATION • INFLUENCE OF THE SETUP PARTS • simplifications of the setup description • different parts of the setup • SYSTEMATIC ERROR (not accurately known exp. conditions) • beam geometry • reactions with protons • inserted detectors • ACCURACY OF SIMULATION • intra-nuclear cascade model used in calculations • PARAMETERS OF THE SETUP • the number of produced neutrons (spallation, fission, ..) • k (criticality) WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  12. The simplifications of the blanket • No influence on high energy neutrons (even numbers) • Box has no influence on HE neutrons ! • Box blurs differences. • 40%, 10% WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  13. Polyethylene, Cd layer • The spectra were taken inside the 1st and 3rd gap. • No influence on HE neutrons. absorption by238U resonance capture WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  14. Aluminum and iron holders, upper iron plate • Two simulations with and without Al, Fe components. The results do not differ outside the limits of statistical error - (HE 3%, LE 10%) • The upper iron plate reduces the number of neutrons for 2%. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  15. The wooden plate • Wooden plate under the target(1+2cm,0.5kg/l). • Without box. • Detectors from top to bottom. • Asymmetry 5% => negligible wood influence. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  16. Systematic error • Systematic error is made, because we can/did not measure all the experimental conditions. • Simulations give us the estimation of the error. • In simulations we vary experimental conditions in limits of the accuracy with which we measured them. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  17. Beam parameters influence • Beam profile is approximated with Gaussian distribution (good only near the beam center !). • We must always count with beam displacement. • Experimentally determined beam profiles and displacement (V Wagner using monitor and track detector data – for profile mainly I Zhuk data): WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  18. Beam profile • Simulations with 3mm, 3cm homogenous beams and with a beam with gaussian profile (FWMH=3cm). • Differences only for few percents. • Not important. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  19. Beam displacement • Beam displaced for 3,5,8, and 10 mm. • Differences between results up to tens of %Displacement must be measured as accurately as possible ! WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  20. The influence of protons • Activation detectors could also be activated by protons. • Cross-sections for reactions with protons are not included in MCNPX. • Estimations from Phasotron experiment and neutron/proton ratio : in gaps, near the central axis ca. 10% of activation is due to protons. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  21. The influence of detectors on neutron field • Metal plate on top reduces the number of neutrons only for 2%. Our detectors are much smaller. • Golden strap (2mm, 4mm) in the first gap has no influence on detectors in other gaps. • Only 0.1 mm thick golden strap is an obstacle for thermal neutrons : it can reduce the production rates of reactions with thermal neutrons inside the same gap for 20%. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  22. The influence of plastic foils for detectors on neutron field • The 4mm and 8mmpolyethylene on which were placed the detectors for 1.5 GeV experiments had effect on LE neutrons. • Au in sandwich of 2 Bi foils => no influence. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  23. Intra-Nuclear Cascade models • In MCNPX 2.4.0 are 3 models (above 150 MeV): • Bertini • CEM • Isabel • The differences are up to 50% (standard, our detectors). WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  24. Experimentally we cannot measure these. For 1.5 GeV experiment, neutron production : 29 in nuc. Interactions 8 in (n,xn) 14 prompt fission. Together 54 neutrons per 1 proton. Without box 49 neutrons. KCODE calculations for criticality : k=19.2% k was calculated also by S.R. Hashemi-Nezhad - 22%. If we add polyethylene wall at the back, k stays the same. Beyond experimental results: neutrons per proton, criticality,.. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  25. Neutrons per proton with beam energy • Neutrons per 1 proton and per 1 MeV in the beam • Box adds ca. 5 neutrons • Saturation • Peak at 1500 MeV WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  26. K.D. Tolstov, “Some Aspects of Accelerator Breeding,” JINR preprint, 18-89-778, Dubna, Russia, 1989 WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

  27. Conclusions • The differences between experiment and simulations : systematic errors vs. models/cross-sections • On the way to qualify the models and cross-section libraries. Thank you. WORKSHOP ON PHYSICS OF ADS FOR ENERGY AND TRANSMUTATION (January 23-26, 2003)

More Related