1 / 10

Open Technology Development “Dot Org” gov’t/industry collaborative discovery Rapid spirals

Federal Acquisition Renaissance …. not your father’s FAR! Using SOA & Internet best practice* to deliver capability faster, better, and cheaper. Open Technology Development “Dot Org” gov’t/industry collaborative discovery Rapid spirals Open standard infrastructure Open IPR

seoras
Télécharger la présentation

Open Technology Development “Dot Org” gov’t/industry collaborative discovery Rapid spirals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Federal Acquisition Renaissance …. not your father’s FAR! Using SOA & Internet best practice* to deliver capability faster, better, and cheaper Open Technology Development “Dot Org” gov’t/industry collaborative discovery Rapid spirals Open standard infrastructure Open IPR Embedded, adaptive V&V, C&A COTS Acquisition Model * Chris.Gunderson@w2cog.org 703 262 5332 www.w2cog.org www.giglite.org

  2. Federal Enterprise Architecture • Goal = Continuously better and more cost-effective customer service across the federal agencies • Interoperability • Shared data, applications, and best practices • Security/privacy • Mutually leveraged investments • SOA concepts, methods, and technology stacks can facilitate FEA goal…. Iff…we also apply SOA biz model!

  3. Uniquely Governmental Issues/Opportunities re: SOA Federal IT requirements formality is at odds with the Internet “just-try-it” engineering model … and … e-Gov incentive model is not as obvious as e-Biz bottom line …yet…. “Infrastructure” is an inherently governmental concern and e-Gov investment in SOA can bolster over all e-Biz Internet infrastructure re : Security/privacy Semantic interoperability …so… The Key to Federal SOA implementation is for e-Gov to partner with e-Biz to mitigate the former and leverage the latter with mutual goals of reducing sustainment costs and recapitalizing improved capability.

  4. Federal SOA Deployment Model Goals • Agile recapitalization • Cross-domain/Cross-agency Trust, Data Access, and Semantic Interoperability • Mutually leveraged investments & best practices Gaps • Shared, secure, and semantically interoperable infrastructure • Open agile collaborative engineering & procurement process & environment Strategy and Tactics • Employ incremental life cycle COTS/GOTS maintenance model • Focus on critical business objectives to define priorities and MOE • Build in security/privacy, scalability and interoperability • Partner with kindred spirits • Leverage “dot org” model to create e-Gov/e-Biz “enterprise space”

  5. Procurement Phases • Evaluation Criteria • Net-Ready Assessment • Vendor Outreach • “Dot Org” Market (e.g. W2COG) • COTS Procurement Method • Acquisition Strategy • Market process • Evaluation Method • Source Selection Plan • Test Plan • Risk Management

  6. Measurable & Testable Parameters Acquisition Criteria: Net-Ready Checklist • Assurance and Performance • Software Assurance OK? • Network Assurance OK?* • Register dynamic discretionary access policy? • Latencies OK? • Reliability OK? • Generate digital diagnostic architectural artifact. • Re-useable/Composable* • Discoverable? • Self describing? • Open standard interfaces? • Cross program investment? • Net-enabling IPR model? • Generate digital diagnostic architectural artifact. • Value/Bit Exchanged • COI approved mission thread? • Register critical conditions of interest • Meta data registered in context? • Increased automation? • Mission based MOE OK (i.e., compress time line, and/or improve mission outcome)? ** • Generate digital diagnostic architectural artifact IA => Share & Protect • Enable sharing across domains • Preserve privacy • Protect network SOA => Reuse & Mash Up • Accelerate delivery of netcentric capability • Enable netcentric interoperability • Enable infrastructure recapitalization • Compose C4 capability on-the-fly Data Strategy => Trusted Discovery in Context • Broker information discovery • Create information value chain feedback loop Net-Ready Parameters and Business Objectives *Bind to Trustworthy SOA Framework, e.g. T-ESB ** Confirm with operational audit

  7. Acquisition Plan = COTS Procurement • Create government brokered development and demonstration environment (e.g. GIGlite) for COTS participants. • Perform embedded government V&V and C&A. • Vendors deliver certified installation ready components

  8. Acquisition Strategy • Qualify COTS (Non-Developed Item (NDI)) by: • COTS legacy • Technical trajectory • Catalogue • Net-Ready Checklist • C&A road-map • Create a Competitive Market Place

  9. Market Process • Gov’t sponsor develop use cases to capture functional and operational requirements • Gov’t authority (e.g. JITC) referee interoperability, security, and net-ready requirements • Dot Org manage vendor participation and publish use cases and documentation (e.g. W2COG Institute) • Gov’t establish and run lab (e.g. NPS) for project – Dot Org develop acquisition documents • Dot Org 90 day build-test-deliver-bundle cycles • Gov’t functional use case test suite

  10. Estimated Cost • Cost to develop/maintain documents $445K • Cost to establish & run marketplace $325K • Cost to set up lab ($150K ODC) $323K • Cost to establish C&A/test docs $250K • Cost for jamboree $289K • Cost for 90 day tests (2, 5 days ea) $375K • Cost for final report $42K • TOTAL $2424

More Related