1 / 7

Samsung Galaxy Rush Review:

Samsung Galaxy Rush Review:. Small, Affordable, Indistinctive By Jessica Dolcourt. Summary. Thesis: “ Android 4.0 and an affordable price help make Boost Mobile's Samsung Galaxy Rush a decent no-contract option, but lower-end specs are disappointing nevertheless .” Main Points:

serena
Télécharger la présentation

Samsung Galaxy Rush Review:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Samsung Galaxy Rush Review: Small, Affordable, Indistinctive By Jessica Dolcourt

  2. Summary Thesis: “Android 4.0 and an affordable price help make Boost Mobile's Samsung Galaxy Rush a decent no-contract option, but lower-end specs are disappointing nevertheless.” Main Points: • Attractive design • Affordable price • Android 4.0 • Small build • Front-facing camera Rating:

  3. Taking a Look at Another Review… Rating: “Samsung Galaxy Rush (Boost Mobile)” by Alex Colon Colon’s Thesis: “The Samsung Galaxy Rush is an inexpensive way to get Android 4.0 on Boost Mobile, but you won't forget that it's a budget smartphone.” Colon’s Points: Multimedia 60,000+ applications Reasonable data plans

  4. Comparing the Two: • Dolcourt’s Review: • -call quality: poor • (loud and muffled) • -attractive design/comfortable grip • -camera: dull and • fuzzy • Colon’s Review: • -call quality: good • (loud and full) • -cheap look/feel • -camera: decent Both agreed: -inexpensive -offers Android 4.0 -low-resolution display -good battery life -slow 3g network -slowprocessor

  5. In Conclusion… Dolcourt’s and Colon’s review were effective in the way that they both: Offered a great amount of information on the phone. Established the criteria in which the phone is good/bad. Stated their own clear evaluation. Both reviews agree on most of the general components of the phone. Considering how their views on some aspects differ, you can’t always rely on one’s opinion.

  6. Questions: Should we view reviews as being beneficial or complicated considering how we all have our own opinion/preferences? How much of an influence/effect do you think reviews have on the public? What things do you look for in a review when purchasing a new product?

  7. Works Cited Colon, Alex. Samsung Galaxy Rush (Boost Mobile).PCMAG. 3 October 2012. 12 October 2012. <http:// www.pcmag.com/ article2/0,2817,2410513,00.asp>. Dolcourt, Jessica. Samsung Galaxy Rush Review.CNET. 5 October 2012. 12 October 2012. <http:// reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/samsung-galaxy- rush-boost/4505-6452_7-35424516.html>.

More Related