1 / 12

NAU/NASA Space Grant Survey of Arizona STEM Best Practices Part 2

NAU/NASA Space Grant Survey of Arizona STEM Best Practices Part 2. Brooke Knighton Dr. Eric Savage. The Survey. Consisted of 26 questions Send to 436 educators across Arizona Gained insight to Arizona STEM integration

shad-pickett
Télécharger la présentation

NAU/NASA Space Grant Survey of Arizona STEM Best Practices Part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NAU/NASA Space Grant Survey of Arizona STEM Best Practices Part 2 Brooke Knighton Dr. Eric Savage

  2. The Survey • Consisted of 26 questions • Send to 436 educators across Arizona • Gained insight to Arizona STEM integration • Aligned with SFAz matrix and Massachusetts Dept. of Education STEM Best Practices

  3. Integration Matrix • Exploratory Model - Offered • Introductory Model - Added • Partial Immersion Model - Integrated • Full Immersion Model - Main

  4. Types of Questions Asked • Demographics • Gender, position, years experience, county, etc. • Rationale • Least/Most difficult to learn/teach, what students will gain from STEM • Integration • Implementation and Evaluation • NASA • Lessons, Professional Development

  5. Analysis • Mixed Results • Compared like questions for accuracy • 12.6% response rate

  6. Analysis – Mixed Results Exploratory Model Introductory Model Partial Immersion Model Full Immersion Model

  7. Analysis - Accuracy

  8. Analysis – Response Rate

  9. Conclusion • Conflicting Data • Subjects have conflicting perceptions on where they stand on the STEM Integration Matrix • Demographics • Majority of respondents were male, administrators, and from urban counties • Response rate does not support statistical significance

  10. Recommendations • Clarify the STEM Integration Matrix • Clear guidelines for what is expected in each category • Expand the current categories • Educate the Educators • Incentivize subjects to increase response rate • Promote more research in STEM Best Practices

  11. Acknowledgements • Dr. Eric Savage – First Flight Education • Dr. Nadine Barlow • Kathleen Stigmon • NAU/NASA Space Grant Internship

  12. Questions?

More Related