1 / 14

Thomas Webb University of Sheffield, UK

Using the Internet to Help People to Act on Intentions: Monitoring, Planning and Environmental Restructuring. Thomas Webb University of Sheffield, UK. SYNERGY 2008: How can psychological theory best be used in the development of internet-based interventions?. Intention. Behaviour.

shad-roach
Télécharger la présentation

Thomas Webb University of Sheffield, UK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using the Internet to Help People to Act on Intentions: Monitoring, Planning and Environmental Restructuring Thomas Webb University of Sheffield, UK SYNERGY 2008: How can psychological theory best be used in the development of internet-based interventions?

  2. Intention Behaviour Motivational interventions Volitional interventions Health Behaviour Change • Target motivation or volition? • Or both? • Milne, S., Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163-184.

  3. Monitoring interventions Planning interventions Environmental restructuring Control Theory(Carver & Scheier, 1982) Reference value Comparator Input function (perception) Output function (behaviour) Impact on environment Disturbance

  4. Monitoring • Self-monitoring of behaviour • The person is asked to keep a record of specified behavior/s • (Abraham & Michie, in press) • Self-monitoring of behavioural outcome • The person is asked to keep a record of specified measures expected to be influenced by the behaviour change • (Abraham & Michie, revised taxonomy)

  5. Cussler et al. (2008) • N = 135 women randomly allocated to either internet or self-directed groups • Internet group used a website to gain information and complete logs concerning their weight, diet, and exercise progress over a 12 month period • Self-directed group had no contact

  6. Cussler et al. (2008)

  7. Action Planning • Involves detailed planning of what the person will do including a very specific definition of the behaviour, namely both (a) how and at least one of (b) when and (c) where to act • (Abraham & Michie, revised taxonomy) • Implementation intentions • If-then contingent structure linking opportunity with response • If opportunity Y arises, then I will perform goal-directed behaviour Z! • Effective across a wide-variety of domains • (Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006)

  8. Sniehotta et al (2007) • N = 239 participants attended a lecture on oral self-care, completed a baseline questionnaire, received a packet of dental floss, information, and a flossing guide • E-mailed link to an online questionnaire that – for one-half of the participants – included a planning intervention • I will use dental floss at ____ (WHEN) at or in ____ (WHERE) before/after ____(activity, e.g., washing my face)

  9. Sniehotta et al (2007)

  10. Environmental Restructuring • The person is prompted to alter the environment in ways so that it is more supportive of the target behaviour (e.g. altering cues or reinforcers) • (Abraham & Michie, revised taxonomy)

  11. Kosma, Cardinal, & McCubbin (2005) • N = 151 physically inactive people with a registered disability were randomly allocated to intervention or control conditions • Intervention group received 4-week web-based physical activity intervention with a different lesson plan for each week • Among other materials, participants received “reminders about the positive societal changes with regards to accessible facilities…” • Control group received a ‘thought of the week’ and encouraging messages to maintain interest in the study

  12. Kosma, Cardinal, & McCubbin (2005)

  13. For Discussion… • Do we gain anything from using Control Theory as a framework for behaviour change? • Which behaviour change techniques work well in combination? • Can Control Theory help to inform this? • Which behaviour change techniques work well in isolation? • Should people be allowed to make their own plans or do researchers ‘know best’? • Should environmental restructuring be an individual or a societal responsibility?

  14. References Abraham, C. S., & Michie, S. (in press). A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology. Abraham, C. S., & Michie, S. (personal communication). A revised taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality, social, clinical and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111-135. Cussler, E. C., Teixeira, P. J., Going, S. B., Houtkooper, L. B., Metcalfe, L. L., Blew, R. M., Ricketts, J. R., Lohman, J., Stanford, V. A., & Lohman, T. G. (2008). Maintenance of weight loss in overweight middle-aged women through the internet. Obesity, 16, 1052-1060. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-120. Kosma, M., Cardinal, B. J., & McCubbin, J. A. (2005). A pilot study of a web-based physical activity motivational program for adults with physical disabilities. Disability Rehabilitation, 27, 1435-1442 Sniehotta, F. F., Soares, V. A., & Dombrowski, S. U. (2007). Randomized controlled trial of a one-minute intervention changing oral self-care behavior. Journal of Clinical Dentistry, 86, 641-645.

More Related