1 / 4

National Environmental Management: Air Quality Bill [B62B-2003]

National Environmental Management: Air Quality Bill [B62B-2003]. Comments of the Chamber of Mines of South Africa. Decision-Making Processes. All amendments should require consultation: “non-substantive” is a relative concept Delete 7(6)(b), 10(4)(b), 21(4)(b), 23(3), 52(3)(b)

shana
Télécharger la présentation

National Environmental Management: Air Quality Bill [B62B-2003]

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Environmental Management: Air Quality Bill [B62B-2003] Comments of theChamber of Mines of South Africa

  2. Decision-Making Processes • All amendments should require consultation: “non-substantive” is a relative concept • Delete 7(6)(b), 10(4)(b), 21(4)(b), 23(3), 52(3)(b) • Decisions to refuse an application must also meet many requirements • Insert “or refuse” in 37(2) • “Promptly” is relative: specify a time period • 37(3): “it must within 5 working days [promptly]” • Reviews and variations need good reasons • 42(2), 43(1): “providing detailed reasons …”

  3. Governance • Imposition of stricter standards than the national (and provincial) norm should require a proper scientific process • 10(1)(a), 11(1)(a): “are quantitatively demonstrated [present or are likely] to present” • Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act and co-operative governance require notification of mine closure • Delete section 30

  4. Transitional Provisions • Existing operations must continue • Include deemed provisional AELs in 22 • Conversion of deemed provisional AEL to AEL should not require EIA • Exclude 35(2) from 58(3) • Process from deemed provisional AEL to AEL is unclear • Remove ambiguities from s 58 • Follow the Bill’s process to develop standards • Delete s 60

More Related