1 / 11

Windsor Policy & Solutions Forum Energy Costs - How to Address Higher Power Costs

Windsor Policy & Solutions Forum Energy Costs - How to Address Higher Power Costs. Bruce Sharp, P. Eng. Director, Electricity Aegent Energy Advisors Inc. bsharp@aegent.ca , 416.622.9449.112. May 15, 2014. In a nutshell. Getting it all wrong Picture is not pretty Costs largely fixed

sharne
Télécharger la présentation

Windsor Policy & Solutions Forum Energy Costs - How to Address Higher Power Costs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Windsor Policy & Solutions ForumEnergy Costs - How to Address Higher Power Costs Bruce Sharp, P. Eng. Director, Electricity Aegent Energy Advisors Inc. bsharp@aegent.ca, 416.622.9449.112 May 15, 2014

  2. In a nutshell • Getting it all wrong • Picture is not pretty • Costs largely fixed • Lowering = transferring

  3. Getting it all wrong • Make electricity consumers – not taxpayers – pay for electricity • Make consumers pay the true cost of the electricity they use • Maintain culture of conservation • Depoliticize electricity policy

  4. Commodity, non-commodity costs • Commodity = spot price + Global Adjustment (“GA”) • 2013: • Spot price (arithmetic average) = $ 24.98/MWh • GA, Class A (average) = $ 33.19/MWh • GA, Class B = $ 59.24/MWh • % of total costs:

  5. Commodity forecast • Total commodity cost = HOEP + GA Class B • (assumes zero load growth)

  6. Costs largely fixed • Capital-intensive • Chunky • Inertia • Overbuild • Bias

  7. Lowering = transferring • Balloon effect • Shift to taxpayers • Ontario Clean Energy Benefit • Provincial portion of HST • Shift to other ratepayers • Debt Retirement Charge • Conservation • Cost allocation

  8. Conserve – or else • See “costs largely fixed” • If costs 95% fixed:

  9. Cost allocation - Germany • EEG is green-only version of Ontario Global Adjustment • 2014: € 62.4/MWh • Industrial policy decision • Significant avoidance (90%) at average load of ≳114 kW (also, electricity cost ≥ 14% of value added) • Intensity requirement can have unintended consequence

  10. Cost allocation - Ontario • GA avoidance • Class A/B • Since January 1, 2011 • Demand-based allocation of GA costs • 5,000 kW threshold, moving down to 3,000 kW • 2013: Average 39% reduction in GA charge • In theory, avoids investment • Benefit can be derived by doing nothing • Price signal ≳ 2 x generation alternative

  11. “Dos” and Don’ts • Do: • Conserve - and more than the other guy • Ratepayer transfers: be transparent, recognize their impact • Don’t: • Transfer costs to taxpayers • Have price signals inconsistent with other options

More Related