1 / 19

Mover Project

Mover Project. Group A ECE 496 April 21 st , 2003. Group Members. Jason Hicks – Mechanical Designer Terry Jones – Software Programmer Brad Larson – Mechanical Designer Jimmy Simons – Group Leader/Programmer Santiago Zambrano – Web Designer/Communications. Overview.

sheba
Télécharger la présentation

Mover Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mover Project Group A ECE 496 April 21st, 2003

  2. Group Members • Jason Hicks – Mechanical Designer • Terry Jones – Software Programmer • Brad Larson – Mechanical Designer • Jimmy Simons – Group Leader/Programmer • Santiago Zambrano – Web Designer/Communications

  3. Overview • Goal – to create a two axis mover device to navigate a course in the smallest amount of time possible • Mechanical Design & Problems • Software/Control Design & Problems • Results & Conclusions

  4. Mechanical design • Base & Frame Assembly • 2 Axis Mover Device • Motors • Encoders

  5. Base & Frame Assembly • Acquired Aluminum Extrusion • Measure Maze Exterior • Assemble Base and Adjust To Fit • Erect Raised 2-Axis Support Structure • Attach Rods

  6. Base & Frame Assembly Problems • Leveling • Fitting Rods • Adjust Rods for Bend due to Cart Weight • Acquiring Parts

  7. 2-Axis Mover Device • Purchased Base Mover and Cart • Modified to specifications of Maze • Added Parts for Stability and Reduced Friction • Fitted Cup

  8. 2-Axis Mover Device Problems • Friction between Rods and Chariot • Weight differential • Axial Strain and shutter

  9. Motors • Tested and Discarded Original Motors • Acquired New Motors • Adjusted Motor Orientation • Acquired Replacement Belts • Implemented New Motors

  10. Motor Problems • Original Motors were Insufficient • Original Belts had Dry Rot

  11. Encoders • Acquired Encoders From Lab • Examined Encoders for complications • Modified Encoders for Attachment

  12. Encoder Problems • Specific Tools were needed • Required Additional Hardware for Attachment

  13. Software Design • Qmotor • Iobc -> getEncoderValue(0) • Iobc -> setDacValue(0,x) • While Loop • While(encoder[0] <=5000) { setDacValue getEncoderValue }

  14. Software Design (cont.) • Iterative loop – designed to move diagonally. Small stair steps to advance in both the X and Y directions • while(situation) { while(encoder[0]<= X) while(encoder[1]<= Y) }

  15. Control Design • Options • Constant voltage • Easy to implement • No way to start and stop the motor accurately • PD Loop control • Easily adjustable through the use of control variables • Voltage depends on distance (large distance = large voltage) • Sine wave control • Ramps the voltage up and then ramps it back down • Distance hard to compute

  16. Sine Wave • Voltage = amplitude * Sin(frequency * encoder[1] + 0.2014) • Amplitude – adjusts voltage going to motor • Frequency – the inverse of the desired distance • 0.2014 – shifts the sine wave to start 0.2 at distance = 0

  17. Software Problems • Sine wave initialization and start • Using control on the diagonal motions • Encoder reading errors • Overrun errors • repeatability • Control Frequency • Program method and loop control

  18. Conclusion & Results • Bonus Day – movement with limited control • Score: 8/10 • Competition Day – finished course after several tries • Time: 5.6 seconds • Repeatability and Encoders

  19. Thank you Any Questions?

More Related