1 / 6

Proposal: Writing Intensive Requirement

Proposal: Writing Intensive Requirement. for Literacy Competencies. rationale. ensures writing-to-learn concept operational across curriculum intervenes when student(s) is “progressing” despite elemental or even very severe challenges w/r/t writing

sheba
Télécharger la présentation

Proposal: Writing Intensive Requirement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Proposal: Writing Intensive Requirement for Literacy Competencies

  2. rationale • ensures writing-to-learn concept operational across curriculum • intervenes when student(s) is “progressing” despite elemental or even very severe challenges w/r/t writing • offers continuity from first year composition to continuing course work • normalizes writing as a part of active learning in academic context

  3. basic outline • first year composition sequence (engl 1010 & 2010 or 2020) • 3-6 semester hours of writing intensive coursework in student’s major • 3-6 semester hours of writing intensive coursework from elective selections (to be determined by CXC committee) • potential mandatory “intervention” course at various levels of development (i.e., ENGL 3030)

  4. course models • CXC Committee to develop course application for WI designation to be filled out by instructor, program and/or department • offer 5 models for course structure as it aligns with WI concepts • model 1: writing to learn • model 2: writing in the disciplines • model 3: expository/academic writing • model 4: professional/technical writing • model 5: interdisciplinary writing in academic contexts

  5. ease of implementation • fyc already required • many courses already “fit” WI designation but might be bolstered in their efforts with CXC workshops, resources, and other forms of guidance • many courses may with some small effort begin to integrate more writing with CXC assistance • intervention can take place through collaborative efforts between teachers and CXC committee members (review of student work, portfolios, and so on)

  6. benefits to students, teachers & UVSC • continuity of writing development & academically appropriate expectations from teachers will benefit students • CXC involvement may help teachers discover ways of integrating more writing w/out adding time to prep or grading (maybe reducing!) • upcoming assessments and accreditation processes are aided by the presence of CXC and WI initiatives on our campus, showing that we are interested in creating a “campus culture of learning”

More Related