1 / 29

Case

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AUTOMATED EMAIL NOTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR RESULTS OF TESTS PENDING AT DISCHARGE.

sheena
Télécharger la présentation

Case

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AUTOMATED EMAIL NOTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR RESULTS OF TESTS PENDING AT DISCHARGE Anuj K Dalal, MD, FHM,Jeffrey L Schnipper, MD, MPH, Eric G Poon, MD, MPH, Kathleen Rossi-Roh, MEd, Allison Macleay, Deborah H Williams, MHA, Catherine L Liang, MPH, Nyryan V Nolido, MA, Jonas Budris, David W Bates, MD, MSc, Christopher L Roy, MD Brigham and Women’s Hospital Partners Healthcare, Inc. This project was supported by the Brigham and Women’s Healthcare Information Technology Innovation Program, and grant number R21HS018229 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

  2. Case • A 55 y/o F is hospitalized for an unprovoked DVT and PE • A hypercoaguable work-up is sent by the inpatient medical team but is pending at discharge • Results return a week later but are neither reviewed by the responsible inpatient attending nor communicated to the PCP

  3. Background:Tests Pending At Discharge (TPADs) • Physicians are aware of approximately 40% of the final results of TPADs† • Few institutions have standardized systems to manage TPADs • Automated systems using “push” notification may improve awareness of TPADs • Successful development and implementation requires integration with inpatient workflow, clinical information systems, and institutional culture †Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, Ladak-Merchant Z, Johnson RE, Maviglia SM, Gandhi TK. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jul 19;143(2):121-8

  4. Purpose:Automated Email Notification System • Identify patients discharged with TPADs • Notify responsible physicians of the finalized results of TPADs via secure, network email • TO Discharging Inpatient Attending • CC Primary Care Physicians (network PCPs) • 3 Email Notification Types: • Chemistry, Hematology • Radiology, Pathology • Microbiology (culture and non-culture)

  5. Design of System:A coordinated sequence of events Discharge time entered by unit clerk Identifies providers from administrative databases Configurable rules to suppress certain TPADs Files TPADs in a queue Excludes selected TPADs • Email Notification Types: • Chem/Heme • Rad/Path • Micro • Triggers emails until all non-suppressed TPADs finalized • Limits one email to provider per notification type per day • Sends emails to inpatient attendings and network PCPs Updates status of TPADs at 12:01 AM Any TPAD finalized? YES Email sent: TO Attending CC PCP (network)

  6. Design Considerations:Alert Fatigue Goal: Maximize utility of system by timely notification of relevantresults Important Questions: • Should we notify providers on only abnormal results? • Should we notify providers on negative results, and if so which ones? • Should we exclude only commonly ordered inpatient results with fast turn-around (i.e., all basic metabolic panels, CBC’s, coags etc.)?

  7. Design Considerations:Alert Fatigue • Incorporated logic to suppress certain, inpatient-specific, non-essential TPADs, modifiable “on-the-fly” • Kept to a minimum during pilot period to see what is coming thru (i.e., kept sensitivity high) • Chemistry: ABG, VBG • Hematology: RBC, MCV, MCH, MCHC, Diff Count • Radiology: • Fluoroscopy use • Uploaded outside hospital images (no reports generated) • Pathology/Microbiology: none • Limited notification volume to no more than one email per notification type per day, until all TPADs finalized. • Micro alerts: after initial notification, sent subsequent notifications only on abnormal results

  8. Chemistry/Hematology Notification March 29, 2011 Dear Dr. HOSPITALIST, M.D.: DISCHARGED PATIENT (BWH# 12345678), for whom you were the attending of record, was discharged from Brigham and Women's Hospital on 03/27/2011. Some tests from this hospitalization were still pending at the time of discharge. We have listed below 1) tests whose results have been finalized after discharge, and 2) tests whose results are still pending. Chemistry and Hematology test types are included in this service. Radiology, Pathology, and Microbiology test types are available in separate notifications The patient's PCP, NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, did not receive this notification because s/he does not have a Partners email address listed. This is a new service we are piloting that we hope you will find to be helpful. Note: Any corrections or changes made after tests are finalized are not captured by this service but are reported per current lab protocol. Inpatient Attending: HOSPITALIST, M.D. Work Phone: 111-111-1111Primary Care Physician: NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, M.D. Work Phone: 222-222-2222 Status: Results FINALIZED Hematology Test Name Results Normal Range Date Resulted ANTITHROMBIN III FUNCTIONAL 76 (69-127 %) 03/28/2011 11:29:00 APCR (FACTOR 5 LEIDEN) 4.17;NEW REFERENCE RANGE EFFECTIVE 3/19/08; PREVIOUS REFERENCE RANGE 0.8-2.50 (2.3-15.0 ) 03/28/2011 11:21:00 Status: Results PENDING Chemistry Test Name Specimen Login Time ANTI-PROTHROMBIN 03/25/2011 17:04:00 CARDIOLIPIN IGG 03/25/2011 17:04:00 CARDIOLIPIN IGM 03/25/2011 17:04:00 Please email the BWH Post-Discharge Results Notification Service for any questions, comments, and concerns related to this alert.

  9. Chemistry/Hematology Notification March 30, 2011 Dear Dr. HOSPITALIST, M.D.: DISCHARGED PATIENT (BWH# 12345678), for whom you were the attending of record, was discharged from Brigham and Women's Hospital on 03/27/2011. Some tests from this hospitalization were still pending at the time of discharge. We have listed below 1) tests whose results have been finalized after discharge, and 2) tests whose results are still pending. Chemistry and Hematology test types are included in this service. Radiology, Pathology, and Microbiology test types are available in separate notifications The patient's PCP, NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, did not receive this notification because s/he does not have a Partners email address listed. This is a new service we are piloting that we hope you will find to be helpful. Note: Any corrections or changes made after tests are finalized are not captured by this service but are reported per current lab protocol. Inpatient Attending: HOSPITALIST, M.D. Work Phone: 111-111-1111Primary Care Physician: NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, M.D. Work Phone: 222-222-2222 Status: Results FINALIZED Chemistry Test Name Results Normal Range Date Resulted CARDIOLIPIN IGG 16;METHODOLOGY CHANGE 8/23/99.;PRE CHANGE REFERENCE RANGE 0-22 GPL, POST CHANGE REFERENCE RANGE 0-15 GPL (0-15 GPL units) 03/29/2011 11:46:00 CARDIOLIPIN IGM 14 (0-15 MPL units) 03/29/2011 11:46:00 Hematology Test Name Results Normal Range Date Resulted ANTITHROMBIN III FUNCTIONAL 76 (69-127 %) 03/28/2011 11:29:00 APCR (FACTOR 5 LEIDEN) 4.17;NEW REFERENCE RANGE EFFECTIVE 3/19/08; PREVIOUS REFERENCE RANGE 0.8-2.50 (2.3-15.0 ) 03/28/2011 11:21:00 Status: Results PENDING Chemistry Test Name Specimen Login Time ANTI-PROTHROMBIN 03/25/2011 17:04:00 Please email the BWH Post-Discharge Results Notification Service for any questions, comments, and concerns related to this alert.

  10. Chemistry/Hematology Notification March 31, 2011 Dear Dr. HOSPITALIST, M.D.: DISCHARGED PATIENT (BWH# 12345678), for whom you were the attending of record, was discharged from Brigham and Women's Hospital on 03/27/2011. Some tests from this hospitalization were still pending at the time of discharge. We have listed below 1) tests whose results have been finalized after discharge, and 2) tests whose results are still pending. Chemistry and Hematology test types are included in this service. Radiology, Pathology, and Microbiology test types are available in separate notifications The patient's PCP, NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, did not receive this notification because s/he does not have a Partners email address listed. This is a new service we are piloting that we hope you will find to be helpful. Note: Any corrections or changes made after tests are finalized are not captured by this service but are reported per current lab protocol. Inpatient Attending: HOSPITALIST, M.D. Work Phone: 111-111-1111Primary Care Physician: NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, M.D. Work Phone: 222-222-2222 Status: Results FINALIZED Chemistry Test Name Results Normal Range Date Resulted ANTI-PROTHROMBIN 3 (0-20 UNITS) 03/30/2011 14:23:00 CARDIOLIPIN IGG 16;METHODOLOGY CHANGE 8/23/99.;PRE CHANGE REFERENCE RANGE 0-22 GPL, POST CHANGE REFERENCE RANGE 0-15 GPL. (0-15 GPL units) 03/29/2011 11:46:00 CARDIOLIPIN IGM 14 (0-15 MPL units) 03/29/2011 11:46:00 Hematology Test Name Results Normal Range Date Resulted ANTITHROMBIN III FUNCTIONAL 76 (69-127 %) 03/28/2011 11:29:00 APCR (FACTOR 5 LEIDEN) 4.17;NEW REFERENCE RANGE EFFECTIVE 3/19/08; PREVIOUS REFERENCE RANGE 0.8-2.50 (2.3-15.0 ) 03/28/2011 11:21:00 Status: Results PENDING Please email the BWH Post-Discharge Results Notification Service for any questions, comments, and concerns related to this alert.

  11. Measures • Background Performance • What’s happening “under-the-hood”? • TPAD processing: volume, % flagged abnormal, % suppressed by rules • Reliability: discharge time, provider identification • Email Notification Performance • What did physicians see? • Volume of notifications by discharged patient, provider, and test type? • User Satisfaction • Surveys to inpatient attending physicians receiving email notifications

  12. Background Performance • 83 discharged patients (~ 1 month, general medicine, cardiology) • 1 incorrect discharge time stamp • Detected 405 chem/heme TPADs • 4.9 per patient • 264 chemistry (65%), 141 hematology (35%) • 73 flagged abnormal (18%) Discharge time entered by unit clerk Identifies providers from administrative databases Suppressed 19 (4.7%, 19/405), all hematology Files TPADs in a queue Excludes selected TPADs Updates status of TPADs at 12:01 AM • 136 emails triggered • ~1.7 alerts per discharged patient (136/82) • 2 or more emails on 34% (28/82) Any TPAD finalized? YES Email sent: TO Attending CC PCP (network)

  13. Background Performance • One incorrectly entered discharge time stamp (1.2%, 1/83) • Unit clerk inadvertently “discharged” patient on Day 4 of 10-day hospitalization • Detected 510 TPADs (249 chem, 261 heme)! • Triggered 9 emails! • A rare event • 3 responses from physicians (on 3 distinct patients) claiming email sent to incorrect provider (3.6%, 3/83) • 2 from Inpatient Attending • 1 from PCP

  14. Email Notifications By Discharged Patient 1.6 alerts per discharged patient Non-network PCPs Email notifications sent to providers of 95 discharged patients with all TPADs finalized

  15. Email Notifications By Inpatient Provider Hospitalists Traditional Internists Cardiologists Email notifications received by 35 distinct inpatient physicians from 3/15/11 thru 4/15/11

  16. User Satisfaction • Inpatient physicians surveyed 3 days after receiving the final notification email • Asked to rate satisfaction on 5-point Likert scale • 70 survey responses (29 physicians) • 84% satisfied or very satisfied • 6% neutral • 10% dissatisfied or very dissatisfied

  17. Selected Comments

  18. Conclusions • Automated email notification is a feasible and reliable strategy for managing results of TPADs, and compatible with inpatient workflow • Successful implementation is dependent on accuracy and reliability of • Discharge time stamp • Provider identification • “Garbage in, garbage out” phenomena

  19. Conclusions • The high volume of TPADs and notifications to providers are challenging to negotiate • Logic to limit volume and frequency of notifications to minimize alert fatigue • A user-configurable system to modify suppression rules is desirable • Users are highly satisfied • Physicians vary with regard to type of results they wish to receive

  20. Thank You! • Questions? • Comments?

  21. Acknowledgements: TPAD Team • BWH Information Systems Project Team • Kathleen Ross-Roh, MEd • Allison Macleay • Margo Daphnis • Eric Poon, MD, MPH • BWH DGM Research Team • Catherine Liang, MPH • Nyryan V Nolido, MA • Deborah H Williams, MHA • Jonas Budris • Catherine Yoon, MSc • David Bates, MD, MSc • Christopher Roy, MD • Jeffrey Schnipper, MD, MPH

  22. Funding • Brigham and Women’s Healthcare Information Technology Innovation Program • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, grant number R21HS018229

  23. Configurable System:Lab Selection

  24. Microbiology Notification • April 17, 2011 • Dear Dr. HOSPITALIST, M.D.: DISCHARGED PATIENT (BWH# 12345678), for whom you were the attending of record, was discharged from Brigham and Women's Hospital on 03/27/2011. Some tests from this hospitalization were still pending at the time of discharge. We have listed below 1) tests whose results have been finalized after discharge, and 2) tests whose results are still pending. Chemistry and Hematology test types are included in this service. Radiology, Pathology, and Microbiology test types are available in separate notifications • The patient's PCP, NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, did not receive this notification because s/he does not have a Partners email address listed. • This is a new service we are piloting that we hope you will find to be helpful. Note: Any corrections or changes made after tests are finalized are not captured by this service but are reported per current lab protocol. • Inpatient Attending: HOSPITALIST, M.D. Work Phone: 111-111-1111Primary Care Physician: NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, M.D. Work Phone: 222-222-2222 • Microbology Results FINALIZED • Specimen Test Result Date Collected Date Resulted • B1052302 BLOOD BLOOD CULTURE NO GROWTH 04/10/2011 04/16/2011 • B1052303 BLOOD BLOOD CULTURE NO GROWTH 04/10/2011 04/16/2011 • B1052164 BLOOD BLOOD CULTURE KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE 04/09/2011 04/15/2011 • B1052165 BLOOD BLOOD CULTURE KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE 04/09/2011 04/15/2011 • Please email the BWH Post-Discharge Results Notification Service for any questions, comments, and concerns related to this alert.

  25. Radiology/Pathology Notification March 21, 2011Dear Dr. HOSPITALIST, M.D.: DISCHARGED PATIENT (BWH# 12345678), for whom you were the attending of record, was discharged from Brigham and Women's Hospital on 03/27/2011. Some tests from this hospitalization were still pending at the time of discharge. We have listed below 1) tests whose results have been finalized after discharge, and 2) tests whose results are still pending. Chemistry and Hematology test types are included in this service. Radiology, Pathology, and Microbiology test types are available in separate notifications The patient's PCP, NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, did not receive this notification because s/he does not have a Partners email address listed. This is a new service we are piloting that we hope you will find to be helpful. Note: Any corrections or changes made after tests are finalized are not captured by this service but are reported per current lab protocol. Inpatient Attending: HOSPITALIST, M.D. Work Phone: 111-111-1111Primary Care Physician: NON-NETWORK PROVIDER, M.D. Work Phone: 222-222-2222 Pathology Results FINALIZED Specimen: SURG,Gastric biopsy Date Resulted: 03/20/2011 PATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS: A. DUODENUM: Mild chronic active duodenitis. B. GASTRIC ANTRUM: Antral mucosa with moderate chronic active gastritis. HELICOBACTER PYLORI ARE SEEN ON H&E STAIN. No intestinal metaplasia identified. C. GASTRIC BODY: Corpus mucosa with mild chronic active gastritis. NUMEROUS HELICOBACTER PYLORI ARE SEEN ON H&E STAIN. No intestinal metaplasia identified. D. DISTAL ESOPHAGUS: Squamous mucosa with active esophagitis with erosion. A PAS-D stain is negative for fungal forms. Please email the BWH Post-Discharge Results Notification Service for any questions, comments, and concerns related to this alert.

  26. What’s in the emails?

  27. Limitations • Single institution within an large integrated healthcare network • A robust culture of email utilization by inpatient physicians • Variable reliability of processes to enter discharge time and maintain administrative databases by clinical service and institution → limit adoption

  28. Implications • “Push” notification is an acceptable strategy to manage results of TPADs • Future studies • Evaluate impact on physician awareness • Analyze downstream actions taken • Elucidate desired features to maximize utility for physicians

More Related