1 / 10

November 19th, 2001 www.prototypecarbon.org

November 19 th WBI-PCF Training Session. World Bank Impact of Carbon Finance on Project Financing. November 19th, 2001 www.prototypecarbon.org. Features of the PCF. Closed-end Mutual Fund structure with diverse portfolio to: Minimize Project Risks Reduce Transactions Costs

sheera
Télécharger la présentation

November 19th, 2001 www.prototypecarbon.org

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. November 19th WBI-PCF Training Session. World BankImpact of Carbon Finance on Project Financing November 19th, 2001 www.prototypecarbon.org

  2. Features of the PCF • Closed-end Mutual Fund structure with diverse portfolio to: • Minimize Project Risks • Reduce Transactions Costs • Enhance the Learning Experience • Shareholding: Governments, $10 m; Companies, $5 m • Total Capital: US$145 million to be used in ~ 30 projects • PCF Products: • Competitively priced, high quality emissions reductions • target portfolio wide outcome price: ~$5/tCO2 ($20/tC) • target deal price: $2.5-3.5/tCO2 (~$9-12tC) • High value knowledge asset: create competitive advantage for corporate investors and efficient market regulation and leverage for sustainable development for Parties

  3. PCF Subscribers ($145 million) Public Sector(6) Governments of Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Canada, and Japan Bank for International Cooperation Private Sector: (17) RWE - Germany, Gaz de France, Tokyo Electric Power, Deutsche Bank, Chubu Electric, Chugoku Electric, Kyushu Electric, Shikoku Electric, Tohoku Electric, Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Electrabel, NorskHydro- Norway, Statoil -Norway, BP-Amoco, Fortum, RaboBank, NL

  4. Impact of Carbon Finance on Project Financing at $3/t CO2e Project, Not Equity, FIRR. Note: data are preliminary

  5. Impact of Carbon Finance on Project Financing at $3/t CO2e Waste-to-Energy project : Chennai, India, MSW • Gasification of solid waste • 15 MW plant, 95 GWh/ann, $38m cost • ERs from: • Power generation displacing fossil fuel (40%) • Methane capture & conversion (60%) Project IRREquity IRR • Without carbon finance 14% 16% • With carbon finance >19% > 25%

  6. Annual Uganda 1-7MW Costa Rica Chile 25MW Mini-Hydro off-grid grid grid ERs (000 t) 49 61 79-138* Net Gen.(GWh) 30 75 160 CO2 ERs/GWh 1664 807 494-860 ER (USc/kWh) 0.50 0.24 * Gas vs. 0.15-0.26 coal BL Impact of Carbon Finance on Project Financing at $3/t CO2e Hydro: Off-grid vs. Grid

  7. Impact of Carbon Finance: Quality and Quantity (at $3/t CO2e) • Methane-capture projects: carbon finance can turn “dogs” into “cash cows” • “Traditional” renewables: boost return by 0.5-2.5% • Makes some marginal deals bankable; • Creates a useful additional risk hedge for already profitable deals • Can displace ODA and Government subsidy in some projects • Quantity of carbon finance is only half the story: The leverage of carbon finance on financial closure is disproportional to volume of carbon finance

  8. Annexes

  9. Typology of Funds/Plays • Pure Carbon Funds (PCF, National Funds) • Private Equity Funds • Aimed at JI/CDM Projects • New Energy, RE, EE Funds with Carbon Credits • Forestry Funds with Carbon Credits • Energy or Forestry Funds that Could Add Carbon Credits • Mutual Funds with % in Private Equity • NGO Funds • Sustainability, Social, Ethical Mutual funds • Corporate “Funds” Earmarked for Carbon Credit Investment

More Related