1 / 9

Clear bias re: Civil Society in the M.East  why?

Civil Society?. Clear bias re: Civil Society in the M.East  why? What kind of associational life can qualify as forming part and parcel of civil society? How does civil society contribute to good rule?.

shelley
Télécharger la présentation

Clear bias re: Civil Society in the M.East  why?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Civil Society? • Clear bias re: Civil Society in the M.East  why? • What kind of associational life can qualify as forming part and parcel of civil society? • How does civil society contribute to good rule?

  2. 1- Transposition of a Euro-centric term  division b/w “political” & “civil” societies  GK origins 2- Orientalism: lingering image of ME  less modern, democratic, “civil”... 3- Religious zeal  associated with absence of a culture of “civisme”… 4- Unrealistic criteria  “civisme” must be reflected in Western-type institutions + practices Scholarly Bias

  3. Bias (cont) • Civil Society  autonomous from “political society”  in M-East: C.S: coterminous with State/political society  dictates against growth of C.S + democratic government •  Corporatism = obstacle to “civism” & “civility”

  4. Corporatism • Problematic term  authoritarian + pluralist meanings: • A system of interest representation in which the constituent units are organised into a limited number of singular, compulsory, non-competitive, hierarchically ordered and functionally differentiated categories, recognised or licensed (if not created) by the state and granted a deliberate representational monopoly within their respective categories in exchange for observing certain controls in their selection of leaders and articulation of demands and supports. • P. Schmitter in Rike & Strich (eds.), The New Corporatism (Notre Dame: NDUP, 1974), pp.93-94.

  5. Eurocentric Conceptions • Locke = C.S.  arena of activity for protection of individual property rights from the state (Two Treatises of Government)  statist conception  without state, C.S. carries no meaning • Hegel (Philosophy of Right) = 1- protection of individual rights + needs of the rich to secure freedom in eco/soc/cul/arenas; 2- activity outside state control or coercion

  6. Marx = C.S.  causal relationship with modes of production  bourgeoisie being its engine • Generally: 1- relationship with growth of public sphere; 2- common good (e.g. equality, tolerance, participation); 3- autonomy from the state

  7. = E. Shils defines CS = • “beyond the boundaries of the family and clan and beyond the locality…[lying] short of the state.” “The Virtue of Civil Society”, Government & Opposition 26 (1992).

  8. Consider These Views... • [There is] confusion in the Arab public mind, at least about the meaning of democracy. The confusion is, however, understandable since the idea of democracy is quite alien to the mind-set of Islam.E. Kedourie, Democracy and Arab Political Culture (Washington, CD: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 1992), p.1.

  9. Civil society interpreted in specifically Western (Lockean, Hegelian…) terms is unlikely to emerge in the Middle East, but this should not exclude the development of other kinds of inclusive solidarity communities.M. Hudson, “Democratisation and the Problem of Legitimacy in the Middle East,” Middle East Studies Association Bulletin 22 (Dec. 1988), p. 168.[In] a secular, liberal state that subscribes to the principles of religious toleration, historical religions...are part of civil society.T. Asad, “Religion and Politics: An Introduction,” in Social Research 59 (Spring 1992), p.9.

More Related