1 / 27

Mining temporal interval relational rules from temporal data

Mining temporal interval relational rules from temporal data. Yong Joon Lee , Jun Wook Lee , Duck Jin Chai , Bu Hyun Hwang , Keun Ho Ryu. JSS ( The Journal of Systems and Software ) 2009. OUTLINE. 1. Introduction 2. Related works 3. Problem definition

shepry
Télécharger la présentation

Mining temporal interval relational rules from temporal data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mining temporal interval relational rules from temporal data Yong Joon Lee , Jun Wook Lee , Duck Jin Chai , Bu Hyun Hwang , Keun Ho Ryu JSS (The Journal of Systems and Software ) 2009

  2. OUTLINE • 1. Introduction • 2. Related works • 3. Problem definition • 4. Technique for mining temporal Interval relation rules • 5. Experimental results • 6. Conclusions and future research

  3. 1. Introduction • Lots of studies did not consider temporal interval data and used only data stamped with time points. • The preprocessing algorithm • The temporal interval relation discovery algorithm

  4. 2. Related works • Sequential patterns • Similar time sequences • Temporal rules • These studies are limited to data stamped with time points and do not consider temporal interval data. • Allen’s interval algebra

  5. 3. Problem definition • TS : a set of primitive time points. • An event e , e = (E,t) • E : event type • t : a time-point at which an event e has occurred. t ∈ TS Event

  6. 3. Problem definition • A transaction is a set of events such as e = (Cid,E,t), • Cid : a customer identifier • E : an event type • t : a time-point that the event has occurred. Transaction

  7. 3. Problem definition • A customer C is a sequence of transactions. • C = <T1,T2,. . .,Tn >, where ts(Ti) < ts(Tj) if i < j. • ts(Ti) : the time-point at which Ti has been issued. Customer

  8. 3. Problem definition • A sequence of events for a customer Cid and an event type E. • Event sequence , ES(Cid,E), is represented by <e1,e2,. . .,en >, where ei = (E, ti), ei ∈ Ti , ti ∈ TS, and ti≦ ti+1 for each i=1,…,n-1 • A time interval between the first event e1 and the last event en of ES is expressed as [t1, tn]. Sequence of events

  9. 3. Problem definition • A time interval between the first event e1 and the last event en of ES is expressed as [t1, tn]. • An event e’ with a temporal interval is denoted as e’= (E,[vs,ve]), • e’.vs = event e’ start time-point • e’.ve = event e’ end time-point • A sequence of events with the same event type can be converted into one generalized event with a time interval.

  10. 3. Problem definition • A sequence ES’ of events with a time interval is denoted by <e1’,e2’,. . .,en’ >,Where ej’ = (Ex ,[vsj, vej]) and vej≦vsj+1 for each j = 1,. . .,n-1. • ES’ is a sequence of events for an event type Ex. Sequence of events with a time interval

  11. 3. Problem definition • Suppose that a database of transactions DB is as follows: EXAMPLE SS(Cid = 101) = { <(D,1)(D,2)> , <(B,1)(B,3)> , <(A,2)(A,3)> , <(E,2)(E,3)(E,7)> , <(C,5)(C,7)> } SS means a set of sequences DB = { T1 = (101 , {D,B}, 1) , T2 = (101 , {D,A,E}, 2) , T3 = (101 , {A,E,B}, 3) , T4 = (101 , {C}, 5 , T5 = (101 , {E,C}, 7)} ES(Cid = 101,E) = <(E,2)(E,3)(E,7)> can be converted into a generalized event (E, [2, 7]). Similary , (D,[1,2]) (B,[1,3]) (A,[2,3]) (C,[5,7])

  12. 3. Problem definition • A temporal interval relation is defined as R(x,y) = {P(x,y)|(x,y)∈Ω ,P∈IO} • The set of temporal interval operators is IO = {before, equals, meets, overlaps, during} • R(x,y) : Temporal interval relation Let IE be {(D, [1,2]), (B, [1,3]), (A, [2,3]). There are three temporal interval relations such as meets(D,A), during(D,B), and during(A,B).

  13. 3. Problem definition

  14. 3. Problem definition

  15. 3. Problem definition • The support of E is denoted by Supp(E) and it is the number of customers supporting E in DB. • If Supp(E)/ Ncust≧Suppmin(the minimum support assigned by a user), then E is a large event type and an event e having E is a large event. • Ncust is the number of customers in DB For instance, assume that there are 500 customers and Suppmin is 40%. If Supp(E) is 200, E is a large event type since Supp(E)/Ncust = 200/500 = 0.4.

  16. 3. Problem definition • For instance, suppose that 10 windows with a window size five exist in the lifespan [1, 50] of Ei. • WFreqmin is 50% ,WFreq(Ei) is 6, Ei is a uniform event type since WFreq(E1)/ Wnum = 6/10 = 0.6. Window size

  17. 3. Problem definition Candidate temporal interval relations

  18. 3. Problem definition • A temporal interval relation rule TR is defined as TR(e1’,e2’,e3’) = (R1(e1’,e2’)|Supp(R1)) Λ (R2(e2’,e3’)|Supp(R2)) Λ (R3(e1’,e3’)|Supp(R3))

  19. 4. Technique for mining temporal Interval relation rules 101 (D,1)(D,2) (B,1)(B,3) (A,2)(A,3) (E,2)(E,3)(E,7) (C,5) [D(1,2)] [B(1,3)] [A(2,3)] [E(2,7)] [C(5)] 101 A B C D E 102 B C E G 103 B C D E F 104 A C D E F

  20. 4. Technique for mining temporal Interval relation rules Window size = 2 Window length = 12/2 = 6

  21. 4. Technique for mining temporal Interval relation rules

  22. 4. Technique for mining temporal Interval relation rules

  23. 4. Technique for mining temporal Interval relation rules • DAGTR(B, C, E) for TR(B, C, E) is defined as (Vertex, Edge), where Vertex = {B, C, E} Edge = {<B, C,before>, <C, E,during>, <B, E, overlapsi>. Event type Events relation Relation support

  24. 4. Technique for mining temporal Interval relation rules

  25. 5. Experimental results

  26. 5. Experimental results

  27. 6. Conclusions and future research

More Related