1 / 51

最近の z~7-8 LBG 探査

最近の z~7-8 LBG 探査. 2009 年 10 月 28 日 鍛治澤　賢. 最近の z~7-8 LBG 探査の論文紹介. Bouwens et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.1803 --- Y-dropout UVLF Oesch et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.1806 --- z-dropout UVLF Bunker et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.2255 --- z-dropout UVLF McLure et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.2437 --- photo-z SED fitting

shiela
Télécharger la présentation

最近の z~7-8 LBG 探査

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 最近の z~7-8 LBG探査 2009年10月28日 鍛治澤　賢

  2. 最近のz~7-8 LBG探査の論文紹介 Bouwens et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.1803 --- Y-dropout UVLF Oesch et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.1806 --- z-dropout UVLF Bunker et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.2255 --- z-dropout UVLF McLure et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.2437 --- photo-z SED fitting Labbe et al. 2009 arXiv:0910.0838 --- +IRAC stellar mass Oesch et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.5183 --- morphology Wilkins et al. 2009 arXiv:0910.1098 --- z-dropout Castellano et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.2853 --- z-dropout Hickey et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.4205 --- Y&z-dropout Ouchi et al. 2009 arXiv:0908.3191 --- z-dropout HUDF: HST/WFC3 GOODS-S: HST/WFC3 GOODS-S: VLT/HAWK-I SDF & GOODS-N: Subaru/Suprime-Cam COSMOS: UKIRT/WFCAM & CFHT/WIRCAM Capak et al. 2009 arXiv:0910.0444 --- z-dropout

  3. Lyman break feature Lyman break

  4. z=0.5 z=1.0 z=1.5 z=3.0

  5. Lyman Break Galaxies U-dropout z~3 G-dropout z~4

  6. Previous studies of z~7 LBGs Bouwens et al. 2008 HST/NICMOS J&H-bands data limiting mag. ~26.5-28ABmag

  7. 最近のz~7-8 LBG探査の論文紹介 Bouwens et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.1803 --- Y-dropout UVLF Oesch et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.1806 --- z-dropout UVLF Bunker et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.2255 --- z-dropout UVLF McLure et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.2437 --- photo-z SED fitting Labbe et al. 2009 arXiv:0910.0838 --- +IRAC stellar mass Oesch et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.5183 --- morphology Wilkins et al. 2009 arXiv:0910.1098 --- z-dropout Castellano et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.2853 --- z-dropout Hickey et al. 2009 arXiv:0909.4205 --- Y&z-dropout Ouchi et al. 2009 arXiv:0908.3191 --- z-dropout HUDF: HST/WFC3 GOODS-S: HST/WFC3 GOODS-S: VLT/HAWK-I SDF & GOODS-N: Subaru/Suprime-Cam COSMOS: UKIRT/WFCAM & CFHT/WIRCAM Capak et al. 2009 arXiv:0910.0444 --- z-dropout

  8. Bouwens et al. arXiv:09091803 Hubble Ultra Deep Field HST/ACS z-band image HST/WFC3 Y, J, H-bands Ultra deep HST/ACS optical images VLT/ISAAC Magellan/PANIC Ks-band HST/NICMOS J&H-bands McLure et al. HUDFHST/WFC3 による Y-dropout 探査

  9. HST/WFC3 WFC3 instrumental handbook

  10. HST/WFC3 WFC3 instrumental handbook

  11. Bouwens et al. arXiv:09091803 HUDF09 program first epoch data (August 26 ~ September 6, 2009) F105W （Y） --- 16 orbits F125W （J） --- 16 orbits F160W （H） --- 28 orbits (1 orbit ~ 40min) ~ 4.7 arcmin2 (two UDF05 fields will be also observed in 2010) PSF FWHM ~ 0.2” 5σ limit @ 0.4” diameter ~ 29ABmag • HST/ACS data B, V, i, z -bands ~29-29.5ABmag HST/WFC3 data

  12. Bouwens et al. arXiv:09091803 • Source detection • Color selection J + H combined image >5.5σ in J band • Y-J > 0.8 • J-H < 0.5 • J-H < 0.2 + 0.12×(Y-J) • no detection (<2σ) in B,V,i,z (those with 1.5~2σ detection in more than one optical band were rejected) Y-dropout selection

  13. Bouwens et al. arXiv:09091803 5 candidates blue J-H color (UV slope β<~-2.5) Possible contaminants >5σ in J & >4σ in H All WFC3 data were obrained in 12days brown dwarfs are more bluer and rare Simulation with 24.5~26mag objects  Not spurious objects  Not SNe  Not galactic stars the expected number of, contaminants by photometric scatter is very small (<~0.2) selected z~8 candnoidates

  14. Bouwens et al. arXiv:09091803 5 candidates blue J-H color (UV slope β<~-2.5) H~28.2-29.2 mag half light radius ~ 0.15” (~PSF) (~0.7h-1kpc @z~8) selected z~8 candidates

  15. Bouwens et al. arXiv:09091803 Expected number for no LF evolution • (1+z)-1 size evolution from z~4 • UV slope β=-2.5±0.4 • are assumed. z~6 i-dropout LF  24 Y-dropouts z~7 z-dropout LF  11 Y-dropouts (~70% statistical error ~35% field-to-field variance) Observed number is lower (~1σ level) Number counts

  16. Bouwens et al. arXiv:09091803 Extraoplation of UV LF at z<7 to z~8  M*UV~-19.45, φ*~0.0011Mpc-3, α~-1.74 good agreement with the observed results Fit M*UV with the observed data φ*~0.0011Mpc-3, α~-1.74 are assumed M*UV = -19.3±0.3 M*UV = -20.2±0.2 @z~6 M*UV = -21 @z~4  strong evolution of M* (?) Stepwise LF  weak evolution at -19~-18 mag Evolution of UV LF

  17. Bouwens et al. arXiv:09091803 Integrate the stepwise UV LF  UV luminosity density unobscured SFR density (and dust correction with those estimated at z~5-6 ) SFR density at z~8

  18. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 • HST/WFC3 • HST/ACS • Spizter/IRAC HST/ACS z-band image Bouwens et al. と同じデータを独立に処理 PSF FWHM ~ 0.15”(Y), 0.16”(J), 0.18”(H) HST/WFC3 Y, J, H-bands 5σ limit @0.4” diameter ~29ABmag 5σ limit @0.6” diameter ~29mag (~28mag for z-band) VLT/ISAAC Magellan/PANIC Ks-band 5σ limit ~25.9(3.6μm) 25.5(4.5μm) 23.3(5.8μm) 22.9(8.0μm) HST/NICMOS J&H-bands McLure et al. z~6-9 galaxy search with HUDF HST/WFC3

  19. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 • Source detection • Photometric redshift • >5σ@0.4” detection in at least one of YJH-bands • No detection (2σ) in i-band  300 objects BVizYJH-bands + 3.6 & 4.5μm upper limit Charlot & Bruzal 2007 templates + empirical U-dropout spectra 〇: z>7 candidates • χ2 distribution z>5.9 candidates Sample selection  49 candidates

  20. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 example z Y J H • Photometric redshift Charlot & Bruzual 2007 templates + empirical U-dropout spectra τ=0.1~10Gyr Calzetti extinction Av=0~2mag 1 solar metallicity Salpeter IMF • χ2 distribution z>5.9 candidates  49 candidates Sample selection

  21. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 SED magnitude χ2 distribution  visual check spurious artifact Transient object Contamination by T dwarfs • ~0.5 down to z=29ABmag • in 4.5arcmin2 WFC3 field The brightest candidate  SN or other transient soruce (not detected at all in NICMOS images) Sample selection

  22. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 49 z>6 candidates No detection in i-band  incomplete at 5.9<z<6.25 including 15 out of 16 z-dropouts in Oesch et al. all 5 Y-dropouts in Bouwens et al. + additional 15 z>6.25 candidates The faintest z-dropout candidate in Oesch et al. Selected sample

  23. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 15 z>7 candidates 8 z>7.5 candidates 3 z>8 candidates J~28-29mag Including 5 Y-dropouts in Bouwens et al. these 5 have acceptable secondary peak at z~1.6 4 z>7.8 candidates occur in two pairs 〇: z>7 candidates extremely high-z sample

  24. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 15 z>7 candidates 8 z>7.5 candidates 3 z>8 candidates J~28-29mag Including 5 Y-dropouts in Bouwens et al. these 5 have acceptable secondary peak at z~1.6 4 z>7.8 candidates occur in two pairs extremely high-z sample

  25. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 15 z>7 candidates 8 z>7.5 candidates 3 z>8 candidates J~28-29mag Including 5 Y-dropouts in Bouwens et al. these 5 have acceptable secondary peak at z~1.6 4 z>7.8 candidates occur in two pairs For the faintest candidates (J, H ~29), no detection in optical ACS images is not sufficient to pick up Lyman break exclusively. extremely high-z sample

  26. McLure et al. arXiv:0909.2437 redshift probability distribution + 1/Vmax method 6.5<z<7.5 z~7 UVLF z~8 UVLF • similar shape with z~6 UVLF • number density evolution of • a factor of ~2.5 from z~6 M*1500 ~ -20.11 Φ* ~ 0.0007Mpc-3 α ~-1.72 • cannot constrain the shape of UVLF • Number density at M1500~-19.5 is a factor of ~2 • smaller than at z~7 7.5<z<8.5 UV luminosity function

  27. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey - South • deep HST/ACS optical images • deep Spizter/IRAC MIR images • deep VLT/ISAAC NIR images • Chandra • Spitzer/MIPS z-dropout search in GOODS-S with HAWK-I

  28. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 HAWK-I 7.5’ x 7.5’ F.O.V 0.106”/pix Y-band 2 pointings Science Verification & ESO Large Program GOODS1 --- 16.25 hour 0.514” FWHM GOODS2 --- 16.93 hour 0.489” FWHM ~89.7arcmin2 ~100% complete at Y~26.2 ~30%compete at Y~26.8 spurious source negligible at Y<26.5 ~10% at Y~26.8 Multi-wavelength data 1σ limit VLT/VIMOS U, R-bands (29.1, 29.5) HST/ACS B, V, i, z-bands(29.0, 29.1,28.6,28.2) VLT/ISAAC J, H, K-bands (26.6,26.2,26.2) VLT/HAWK-I data

  29. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 Y-selected Y<26.7 Y-J>1.0 detect z>6.5 Lyαbreak HAWK-I Y-band ACS z-band sample selection

  30. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 Y-selected Y<26.7 Y-J>1.0 Y-J<1.5 & Y-K<2.0 detect z>6.5 Lyαbreak reject old/dusty galaxies at z~1-4 sample selection

  31. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 Y-selected Y<26.7 Y-J>1.0 Y-J<1.5 & Y-K<2.0 No detection in optical detect z>6.5 Lyαbreak reject old/dusty galaxies at z~1-4 <2σ in all UBVRI-bands <1σ in at least four of UBVRI-bands 139  9 candidates One of interlopers with z-Y>1 sample selection

  32. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 add artificial objects with Y=24-27.5 at z=5.5-8 (assuming size and LF of z~5.5-6 LBGs) Simulation for sample selection

  33. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 9 z~7 candidates 1 known cool dwarf is rejected (relatively red Y-J color) expected contamination  ~3.4 cool dwarfs for 2 HAWK-I F.O.V. another one which is not detected in the deep NICMOS H-band (Y-H<-1) is rejected  7 candidates Selected candidates

  34. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 B+V+i z Y J+H+K F110W F160W 3.6μm

  35. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 stacking of 7 candidates  zphot=6.80 Selected candidates

  36. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 Observed number counts of z~6.8 LBGs are smaller than predictions from z~6 LFs. (No evolution for UV LF between z~6 and z~6.8) • UV LF seems to evolve • between z~6 and z~6.8 Number Counts

  37. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 Assumed UV Luminosity function simulation (source detection, color selection) Expected z-dropout number counts Observed number counts Maximum likelihood Φ* = 0.35+0.16-0.11 ×10-3 Mpc-3 M*(1500Å) = -20.24±0.45 assuming α=-1.71 UV luminosity function

  38. Castellano et al. arXiv:0909.2583 Φ* = 0.35+0.16-0.11 ×10-3 Mpc-3 M*(1500Å) = -20.24±0.45 assuming α=-1.71 Evolution between z~6 and z~6.8 d(logΦ*)/dz = -0.59±0.25 dM*/dz = 0.13±0.51 rule out no evolution between z~6 and z~6.8 at 99% confidence level UV luminosity density ρUV = 1.5+2.0-0.9×1025 erg/s/Hz/Mpc3  a factor of ~3.5 lower than at z~6 Evolution of UV LF

  39. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 GOODS-North Subaru Deep Field z-dropout search in SDF & GOODS-N with Subaru/S-Cam

  40. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 y (zR)-band 2 fields --- 1568 arcmin2 Subaru Deep Field 26 hours 810 arcmin2 GOODS-North 33 hours 758 arcmin2 3σ limit @ 1.8” diameter SDF 26.4 ABmag GOODS-N 26.2 ABmag Other bands SDF BVR + z’ GOODS-N UBVR + z’ z-band 3σ limit SDF 27.7 mag GOODS-N 26.9 mag Suprime-Cam data

  41. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 • y-selected samaple >4σ limit SDF y<26.1 GOODS-N y<25.9 • z’-y > 1.5 selection for z>6.5 galaxies possible contamination by cool dwarfs (no selection by Y-J color) • no detection in UBVR-bands (<2σ) <2σ limit SDF 29.4(B), 28.6(V), 28.8(R) GOODS-N 27.3(U), 28.0(B), 26.7(V), 27.0(R) Sample selection

  42. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 15+7=22 candidates all candidates have y>25.4mag 1 (brightest) candidate  zspec=6.96 Selected candidates GOODS-N SDF

  43. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 detection completeness ~70%@y=25.5 >50%@y~25.8 Selected candidates

  44. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 22 candidates Expected contamination ~1 spurious source ~0.1 transient object ~1 lower-z galaxies with photometric error ~8 L/T-type dwarfs redshift selection function UV luminosity function signifincantly decreases from z~6 at bright magnitude UV luminosity fobunction

  45. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 Subaru/Scam + HST/NICMOS Φ* = 1.10+2.79-0.79×10-3 Mpc-3 M* = -19.9±0.7 α = -1.66±1.32 Evolution between z~6 and z~7 at >2σ level The decrease of L* is dominant factor ? UV luminosity function

  46. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 integrating UV LF 2.7+6.9-1.9×1026 erg/s/Hz/Mpc3 SFR density 3.4+8.6-2.4×10-3 M◎/yr/Mpc3 evolution of a factor of >10 between z~2-3 and z~7 SFRD decreases even from z~6 to z~7. UV luminosity density

  47. Ouchi et al. arXiv:0908.3191 strong clustering of z~7 LBGs especially for UV bright LBGs Spatial distribution

  48. Summary UV luminosity density (LBG number density) factor of 2~3.5 decrease factor of 2~3 decrease z~6 (i-dropout) z~7 (z-dropout) z~8 (Y-dropout)

  49. おまけ

  50. Oesch et al. arXiv:0909.5183 Size evolution Surface SFR density

More Related