1 / 13

Direction des Systèmes d’Information RENAULT

PDQ Policy to improve OEMs-Suppliers Data Exchanges ProSTEP iViP Symposium 2007. Direction des Systèmes d’Information RENAULT. 25/04/2007. Summary. Basic issues Consequences PDQ History RENAULT PDQ history (milestones) Deployment roadmap of CATIA PDQ Zoom on the deployment of CATIA

shiloh
Télécharger la présentation

Direction des Systèmes d’Information RENAULT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PDQ Policy to improve OEMs-Suppliers Data Exchanges ProSTEP iViP Symposium 2007 Direction des Systèmes d’Information RENAULT 25/04/2007

  2. Summary • Basic issues • Consequences • PDQ History • RENAULT PDQ history (milestones) • Deployment roadmap of CATIA PDQ • Zoom on the deployment of CATIA • CATIA V4 • CATIA V5 • Some results (graphics, focus on Catia V5) • Next steps • Profit evaluation • Conclusion

  3. Basic issues • Data Exchanges between CAD systems have always been difficult. • Waste of time, and loose of information. • Rebuild of the digitalisation, • Misunderstanding • Errors of translation • Multiple loops of exchange • The Management ignore that issue • Data exchange must be fluent and free of expenses • Data Exchange never improve the quality of the data : • Garbage in, garbage out…

  4. Consequences • To ensure a completed Data exchange : • The main issue is the quality of the digitalisation, • and the only efficient way is to work on the original digitalisation. • We defined digitalisation quality rules • such as their use ensure as much as possible the completion of the exchange

  5. RENAULT PDQ history (milestones) • Some Quality rules were used in Euclid at the end of the 80’s to help the supplier chain. • GALIA et VDA Geometrical Guidelines were written. • 3 CAD systems were available in 1998 in Renault • Catia V4 was especially sensitive to imported data • SASIG workshops on PDQ (1999-2007…) • SASIG PDQ Guidelines • Deployment of CATIA V4 checks (2001). • Deployment of CATIA V5 checks (2005). • GALIA Workshop on Catia V5 PDQ (2006).

  6. Deployment roadmap of CATIA PDQ • Steps of the deployment : • First, some Quality rules within Catia V4 (/cln) • Then, use of an external checking tool • Then, insertion of the checking tool in the PDM • Then, Quality results targets • Then, implication of the suppliers • At last but not least, the recording in the PDM is forbidden in case of lack of quality. • To be followed by : • Some Catia V5 rules checked in the PDM. • Increasing of the number of Catia V5 checks.

  7. Results Within PQA versions, 2005 2006 2007 2008

  8. Results

  9. Results • The users point of view • Checking time must be as short as possible • Quality rules must be easy to understand 3’00’’ 2’35’’ 1’50’’ 1’44’’

  10. Results • Focus on the two main Renault Engineer Departments : Mechanical Department (grey) Vehicle Department (yellow – “under construction” data / red - official data).

  11. Next steps • The next steps 2007-2008 • 3 PQA releases • C5I21 vs. current release + 6 checks • C5I22 vs. C5I21 + 13 checks • C5I23 vs. C5I22 + 4 checks (then still 16 checks to reach the current target) • 100% official data stored in the PDM with no K1 errors.

  12. Profit Evaluation Example

  13. Conclusions • We know the amount of money which can be saved is significant, despite the fact that it is rather difficult to evaluate it… • The PDQ Policy is currently mainly accepted by all actors in OEMs-Supplier automotive industry. The rate of data with a good Quality rate is significant (more that 95% of the official data). • To be more efficient, a target could be to share the common main Quality rules among major OEMs and Suppliers. That’s what we do in France, at least…

More Related