1 / 10

GE and Competitive Analysis

GE and Competitive Analysis. James Oldroyd Kellogg Graduate School of Management Northwestern University j-oldroyd@northwestern.edu 801-422-7888 650 TNRB. Early experiments in transportation. Costs. Cost. Per Hour. Minutes. GE. 48. 17. 65. 32-38. Necchi. Matsushita. 32-38. 1.7.

shlomo
Télécharger la présentation

GE and Competitive Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GE and Competitive Analysis James Oldroyd Kellogg Graduate School of Management Northwestern University j-oldroyd@northwestern.edu 801-422-7888 650 TNRB

  2. Early experiments in transportation

  3. Costs Cost Per Hour Minutes • GE 48 17 65 32-38 Necchi Matsushita 32-38 1.7 25 Sanyo, Hitachi, Toshiba 25 Under 30 Embraco-Matsushita 24 1.4 35

  4. Labor Material Non-US Plant SG&A Overhead New Costs Labor Material US Plant SG&A Overhead

  5. Class Summary • GE’s Experience Illustrates: • Benchmarking (relative cost position analysis) is a key first step to make vs. buy and plant location decisions. • Key question to ask: “Are we as good as the best in the world at this activity?” • Be careful about letting “nationalistic” ideals unduly influence decisions (need a geocentric mindset). Also, understanding the technology is critical for top managers to make the right decisions. • Benchmarking Example Illustrates: • Firms may need a dedicated “competitive intelligence” team to continuously benchmark competitor practices. • Focus on key cost areas (80/20 rule). Don’t waste resources • Detailed analysis (data) on processes and practices (visits, interviews) is necessary to understand what processes to actually change/adopt.

  6. BENCHMARKING(RELATIVE COST POSITION ANALYSIS) • COMPARISON OF PROCESSES AND PRACTICES TO • IDENTIFY LOW COST PRACTICES AND QUANTIFY • TARGET COST SAVINGS POTENTIAL • PLANT VS. PLANT • PROCESS VS. PROCESS • MACHINE VS. MACHINE • EMPLOYEE FUNCTION VS. EMPLOYEE FUNCTION $200 150 100 50 0 SG&A Overhead SG&A Direct Labor Overhead Manufacturing Cost Per Unit (Dollars) Direct Labor Material Material Client Plant Competitor Plant

  7. Raw Materials (material per piece; scrap per piece) Labor (number of direct/ indirect employees, wages and fringe rates) Capital Investment (building/ machinery type, age, & cost) Transportation (cost per container, pieces per cont.) Advertising Corporate Overhead (SG&A expenses; number of sales/ officers) Material analysis, commodity mkts, suppliers, purchasing. Chamber of commerce, Dept. of Labor form EE0-1; corporate phone books, headcount, past employees. Chamber of commerce, contractors, machinery mfgs. Common carriers, physical examination, proc. & supply. Leading National Advertisers (LNA); count. Annual reports, former employees. Benchmarking Expense Item Sources

  8. The modern lion

  9. “Matthews…we’re getting another one of those strange ‘aw blah es spanyol’ sounds.”

  10. Today • http://www.geappliances.com/arctica/

More Related