1 / 47

Ethics and Technology: PALawHELP and PAProbono

Ethics and Technology: PALawHELP.org and PAProbono.net. Pro Bono Primer: Tools and Information for the Pro Bono Lawyer June 27, 2008. Rule 6.1 -Voluntary Pro Bono Publico Service.

sibyl
Télécharger la présentation

Ethics and Technology: PALawHELP and PAProbono

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ethics and Technology:PALawHELP.org and PAProbono.net Pro Bono Primer: Tools and Information for the Pro Bono Lawyer June 27, 2008

  2. Rule 6.1 -Voluntary Pro Bono Publico Service A lawyer should render public interest legal service. A lawyer may discharge this responsibility by providing professional services at no fee or a reduced fee to persons of limited means or to public service or charitable groups or organizations, by service in activities for improving the law, the legal system or the legal profession, and by financial support for organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means.

  3. Rule 6.1 - Comment • The ABA House of Delegates has formally acknowledged ‘‘the basic responsibility of each lawyer engaged in the practice of law to provide public interest legal services’’ without fee, or at a substantially reduced fee, in one or more of the following areas: poverty law, civil rights law, public rights law, charitable organization representation and the administration of justice. This Rule expresses that policy but is not intended to be enforced through disciplinary process.

  4. Rule 6.1 - Comment • The rights and responsibilities of individuals and organizations in the United States are increasingly defined in legal terms. As a consequence, legal assistance in coping with the web of statutes, rules and regulations is imperative for persons of modest and limited means, as well as for the relatively well-to-do.

  5. Rule 6.1 - Comment • The basic responsibility for providing legal services for those unable to pay ultimately rests upon the individual lawyer, and personal involvement in the problems of the disadvantaged can be one of the most rewarding experiences in the life of a lawyer. Every lawyer, regardless of professional prominence or professional workload, should find time to participate in or otherwise support the provision of legal services to the disadvantaged. The provision of free legal services to those unable to pay reasonable fees continues to be an obligation of each lawyer as well as the profession generally, but the efforts of individual lawyers are often not enough to meet the need. Thus, it has been necessary for the profession and government to institute additional programs to provide legal services. Accordingly, legal aid offices, lawyer referral services and other related programs have been developed, and others will be developed by the profession and government. Every lawyer should support all proper efforts to meet this need for legal services.

  6. Rule 6.1 - Comment • Law firms should act reasonably to enable and encourage all lawyers in the firm to provide the pro bono legal services called for by this Rule.

  7. Hypothetical: Is it Just Information or Is the Person a Client? Providence Bono, an attorney in private practice known as “Pro” to her friends, has agreed to participate in her local bar association’s “Legal Information Phone-a-thon” by providing brief telephone information (“Information about the law, not legal advice” reads the Bar ad in the local paper) to individuals who have been screened for eligibility by the local legal aid office but whose cases fall in areas that are not among those “urgent” cases the local office handles as it performs civil legal aid triage with too many cases and too few resources.

  8. Hypothetical: Questions Raised • At what point does Ms. Bono go beyond merely providing legal information to Mr. Needy? • When, if ever, does an attorney-client relationship form between Ms. Bono and Mr. Needy?

  9. PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT - Preamble PREAMBLE: A Lawyer's Responsibilities – Scope • Furthermore, for purposes of determining the lawyer's authority and responsibility, principles of substantive law external to these Rules determine whether a client-lawyer relationship exists. Most of the duties flowing from the client-lawyer relationship attach only after the client has requested the lawyer to render legal services and the lawyer has agreed to do so. But there are some duties, such as that of confidentiality under Rule 1.6, that attach when the lawyer agrees to consider whether a client-lawyer relationship shall be established. See Rule 1.18. Whether a client-lawyer relationship exists for any specific purpose can depend on the circumstances and may be a question of fact.

  10. Hypothetical: Questions Raised • Is it ethically permissible for Ms. Bono to limit her services to just informing Mr. Needy about resources available or to just providing brief advice? • If so, what must Ms. Bono do to make sure Mr. Needy agrees to her limited representation of him?

  11. Rule 6.5 Rule 6.5 Nonprofit and Court Appointed Limited Legal Services Programs • A lawyer who, under the auspices of a program sponsored by a nonprofit organization or court, provides short-term limited legal services to a client without expectation by either the lawyer or the client that the lawyer will provide continuing representation in the matter: • is subject to Rules 1.7 and 1.9(a) only if the lawyer knows that the representation of the client involves a conflict of interest; and • is subject to Rule 1.10 only if the lawyer knows that another lawyer associated with the lawyer in a law firm is disqualified by Rule 1.7 or 1.9(a) with respect to the matter. • Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2), Rule 1.10 is inapplicable to a representation governed by this Rule.

  12. Rule 6.5 - Comment • Legal services organizations, courts and various nonprofit organizations have established programs through which lawyers provide short-term limited legal services – such as advice or the completion of legal forms – that will assist persons to address their legal problems without further representation by a lawyer. In these programs, such as legal-advice hotlines, advice-only clinics or pro se counseling programs, a client-lawyer relationship is established, but there is no expectation that the lawyer’s representation of the client will continue beyond the limited consultation. Such programs are normally operated under circumstances in which it is not feasible for a lawyer to systematically screen for conflicts of interest as is generally required before undertaking a representation. See, e.g., Rules 1.7, 1.9 and 1.10.

  13. Rule 6.5 - Comment • A lawyer who provides short-term limited legal services pursuant to this Rule must secure the client’s informed consent to the limited scope of the representation. See Rule 1.2(c). If a short-term limited representation would not be reasonable under the circumstances, the lawyer may offer advice to the client but must also advise the client of the need for further assistance of counsel. Except as provided in this Rule, the Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c), are applicable to the limited representation.

  14. Rule 6.5 - Comment • Because a lawyer who is representing a client in the circumstances addressed by this Rule ordinarily is not able to check systematically for conflicts of interest, paragraph (a) requires compliance with Rules 1.7 or 1.9(a) only if the lawyer knows that the representation presents a conflict of interest for the lawyer, and with Rule 1.10 only if the lawyer knows that another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm is disqualified by Rules 1.7 or 1.9(a) in the matter.

  15. Rule 6.5 - Comment • Because the limited nature of the services significantly reduces the risk of conflicts of interest with other matters being handled by the lawyer’s firm, paragraph (b) provides that Rule 1.10 is inapplicable to a representation governed by this Rule except as provided by paragraph (a)(2). Paragraph (a)(2) requires the participating lawyer to comply with Rule 1.10 when the lawyer knows that the lawyer’s firm is disqualified by Rule 1.7 or 1.9(a). By virtue of paragraph (b), however, a lawyer’s participation in a short-term limited legal services program will not preclude the lawyer’s firm from undertaking or continuing the representation of a client with interests adverse to a client being represented under the program’s auspices. Nor will the personal disqualification of a lawyer participating in the program be imputed to other lawyers participating in the program.

  16. Rule 6.5 - Comment • If, after commencing a short-term limited representation in accordance with this Rule, a lawyer undertakes to represent the client in the matter on an ongoing basis, Rules 1.7, 1.9(a) and 1.10 become applicable.

  17. Hypothetical: Questions Raised • Should anything between these two people be reduced to writing?

  18. Rule 6.5 - Comment • A lawyer who provides short-term limited legal services pursuant to this Rule must secure the client’s informed consent to the limited scope of the representation. See Rule 1.2(c). If a short-term limited representation would not be reasonable under the circumstances, the lawyer may offer advice to the client but must also advise the client of the need for further assistance of counsel. Except as provided in this Rule, the Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c), are applicable to the limited representation.

  19. Rule 1.0 Terminology (e) "Informed consent" denotes the consent by a person to a proposed course of conduct after the lawyer has communicated adequate information and explanation about the material risks of and reasonably available alternatives to the proposed course of conduct.

  20. Rule 1.0 Terminology (b) "Confirmed in writing," when used in reference to the informed consent of a person, denotes an informed consent that is given in writing by the person or a writing that a lawyer promptly transmits to the person confirming an oral informed consent. See paragraph (e) for the definition of "informed consent.“ If it is not feasible to obtain or transmit the writing at the time the person gives informed consent, then the lawyer must obtain or transmit it within a reasonable time thereafter.

  21. Hypothetical: Questions Raised • Should Ms. Bono have done a conflict check before even beginning the call from Mr. Needy or at any time during their conversation? • What happens if it turns out that her law partner has represented the landlord in the past, before Ms. Bono joined the firm?

  22. Rule 6.5 Rule 6.5 Nonprofit and Court Appointed Limited Legal Services Programs • A lawyer who, under the auspices of a program sponsored by a nonprofit organization or court, provides short-term limited legal services to a client without expectation by either the lawyer or the client that the lawyer will provide continuing representation in the matter: • is subject to Rules 1.7 and 1.9(a) only if the lawyer knows that the representation of the client involves a conflict of interest; and • is subject to Rule 1.10 only if the lawyer knows that another lawyer associated with the lawyer in a law firm is disqualified by Rule 1.7 or 1.9(a) with respect to the matter. • Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2), Rule 1.10 is inapplicable to a representation governed by this Rule.

  23. Rule 6.5 - Comment • Legal services organizations, courts and various nonprofit organizations have established programs through which lawyers provide short-term limited legal services – such as advice or the completion of legal forms – that will assist persons to address their legal problems without further representation by a lawyer. In these programs, such as legal-advice hotlines, advice-only clinics or pro se counseling programs, a client-lawyer relationship is established, but there is no expectation that the lawyer’s representation of the client will continue beyond the limited consultation. Such programs are normally operated under circumstances in which it is not feasible for a lawyer to systematically screen for conflicts of interest as is generally required before undertaking a representation. See, e.g., Rules 1.7, 1.9 and 1.10.

  24. Rule 6.5 - Comment • Because a lawyer who is representing a client in the circumstances addressed by this Rule ordinarily is not able to check systematically for conflicts of interest, paragraph (a) requires compliance with Rules 1.7 or 1.9(a) only if the lawyer knows that the representation presents a conflict of interest for the lawyer, and with Rule 1.10 only if the lawyer knows that another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm is disqualified by Rules 1.7 or 1.9(a) in the matter.

  25. Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest: Current Clients • Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: • the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or • there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer. • Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if: • the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client; • the representation is not prohibited by law; • the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; And • each affected client gives informed consent.

  26. Rule 1.9 Duties to Former Clients • A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client gives informed consent. • A lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which a firm with which the lawyer formerly was associated had previously represented a client • whose interests are materially adverse to that person; and • about whom the lawyer had acquired information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter; unless the former client gives informed consent. • A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter or whose present or former firm has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter: • use information relating to the representation to the disadvantage of the former client except as these Rules would permit or require with respect to a client, or when the information has become generally known; or • reveal information relating to the representation except as these Rules would permit or require with respect to a client.

  27. Rule 1.10 Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule • While lawyers are associated in a firm, none of them shall knowingly represent a client when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so by Rules 1.7 or 1.9, unless the prohibition is based on a personal interest of the prohibited lawyer and does not present a significant risk of materially limiting the representation of the client by the remaining lawyers in the firm, or unless permitted by Rules 1.10(b) or (c). • When a lawyer becomes associated with a firm, the firm may not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that lawyer, or a firm with which the lawyer was associated, had previously represented a client whose interests are materially adverse to that person and about whom the lawyer had acquired information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter unless: • the disqualified lawyer is screened from any participation in the matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom; and • written notice is promptly given to the appropriate client to enable it to ascertain compliance with the provisions of this rule.

  28. Rule 1.10 Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule • When a lawyer has terminated an association with a firm, the firm is not prohibited from thereafter representing a person with interests materially adverse to those of a client represented by the formerly associated lawyer and not currently represented by the firm, unless: • the matter is the same or substantially related to that in which the formerly associated lawyer represented the client; and • any lawyer remaining in the firm has information protected by Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c) that is material to the matter. • A disqualification prescribed by this Rule may be waived by the affected client under the conditions stated in Rule 1.7. • While lawyers are associated in a firm, a prohibition in paragraphs (a) through (i) of Rule 1.8 that applies to any one of them shall apply to all of them.

  29. Rule 1.10 Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule • The disqualification of lawyers in a firm with former or current government lawyers is governed by Rule 1.11. • The disqualification of lawyers in a firm with a former judge, arbitrator, mediator or other third-party neutral is governed by Rule 1.12. • Where a lawyer in a firm is disqualified from a matter due to consultation with a prospective client pursuant to Rule 1.18(b) and (c), disqualification of other lawyers in the same firm is governed by Rule 1.18(d). • The disqualification of a lawyer when another lawyer in the lawyer's firm is likely to be called as a witness is governed by Rule 3.7.

  30. Hypothetical: Questions Raised • If an attorney-client relationship exists, what are Ms. Bono's obligations once the relationship has been created?   • Is she required to represent him in the unemployment case he has pending that is, in Mr. Needy’s view, the source of his problem with the landlord?

  31. Rule 6.5 Rule 6.5 Nonprofit and Court Appointed Limited Legal Services Programs • A lawyer who, under the auspices of a program sponsored by a nonprofit organization or court, provides short-term limited legal services to a client without expectation by either the lawyer or the client that the lawyer will provide continuing representation in the matter: • is subject to Rules 1.7 and 1.9(a) only if the lawyer knows that the representation of the client involves a conflict of interest; and • is subject to Rule 1.10 only if the lawyer knows that another lawyer associated with the lawyer in a law firm is disqualified by Rule 1.7 or 1.9(a) with respect to the matter. • Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2), Rule 1.10 is inapplicable to a representation governed by this Rule.

  32. Rule 6.5 - Comment • Legal services organizations, courts and various nonprofit organizations have established programs through which lawyers provide short-term limited legal services – such as advice or the completion of legal forms – that will assist persons to address their legal problems without further representation by a lawyer. In these programs, such as legal-advice hotlines, advice-only clinics or pro se counseling programs, a client-lawyer relationship is established, but there is no expectation that the lawyer’s representation of the client will continue beyond the limited consultation. Such programs are normally operated under circumstances in which it is not feasible for a lawyer to systematically screen for conflicts of interest as is generally required before undertaking a representation. See, e.g., Rules 1.7, 1.9 and 1.10.

  33. Rule 6.5 - Comment • A lawyer who provides short-term limited legal services pursuant to this Rule must secure the client’s informed consent to the limited scope of the representation. See Rule 1.2(c). If a short-term limited representation would not be reasonable under the circumstances, the lawyer may offer advice to the client but must also advise the client of the need for further assistance of counsel. Except as provided in this Rule, the Rules of Professional Conduct, including Rules 1.6 and 1.9(c), are applicable to the limited representation.

  34. Rule 1.2 Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Lawyer (c) A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent.

More Related