1 / 17

Cost Efficient Use of COSMO-LEPS Reforecasts

Cost Efficient Use of COSMO-LEPS Reforecasts. Felix Fundel, André Walser , Mark Liniger, Christof Appenzeller. Motivation: Reforecast Bias 1971-2000. Temperature. Precipitation. too wet. too warm. Motivation: Reforecast Bias 1971-2000. Temperature. Precipitation.

sienna
Télécharger la présentation

Cost Efficient Use of COSMO-LEPS Reforecasts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cost Efficient Use of COSMO-LEPS Reforecasts Felix Fundel, André Walser, Mark Liniger, Christof Appenzeller

  2. Motivation: Reforecast Bias 1971-2000 Temperature Precipitation too wet too warm

  3. Motivation: Reforecast Bias 1971-2000 Temperature Precipitation • Calibrating with reforecast reduces the forecast bias • Ensemble forecasts become more reliable • Shown for up to date global and regional EPS

  4. Outline • Status of the reforecast project • New results • Outlook and open issues

  5. Status of the reforecast project • Research-Program has finished • Work in progress to make calibrated COSMO-LEPS products operational • Large reforecast data set available, also used in other research projects

  6. Reforecasts Data Set Intention: statistically independent data for a long period • reforecasts over a period of 30 years (1971-2000) • deterministic run of COSMO-LEPS v 4.0 convection and physics randomly switched • ERA40 reanalysis as initial/boundary fields • 90h lead time, every 3rd day 1971-01-01 1971-01-03 1971-01-06 LT: 90h Available at ECMWF mars archive: . . . retrieve, time=12:00:00, date=2008-03-10, stream=enfh, step=0/to/90, levtype=sfc, expver=2, type=cf, hdate=1971-03-10/to/2000-03-10 class=co, param=61.2 2000-12-27 2000-12-29 2000-12-31

  7. Gridded observations for Switzerland • 24h total precipitation • domain Switzerland • COSMO-LEPS grid (SYMAP, C. Frei) • >450 Observations

  8. Calibration Calibration method: - CDF mapping - each grid point calibrated individually - using gridded observations over Switzerland winter precip. summer precip. Brier Skill Score day 1 day 2 day 3 day 4 day 1 day 2 day 3 day 4

  9. However… • Reforecasts are very expensive • cost for 2 years reforecasts = cost for 1 forecast member (current setup, reforecast every 3rd day, 90h lead-time)  What‘s the skill of COSMO-LEPS with 16-n forecast members, calibrated with 2xn years of reforecasts?

  10. Isocost analysis - Precipitation RPS Summer-Fall 2008 RPS Winter-Spring 2007/2008 Best setup: 16 member & 30y reforecasts Best isocost setup: 11 member & 10y reforecasts

  11. Isocost analysis - Precipitation

  12. Isocost analysis - Precipitation 2AFC sore Summer-Fall 2008 2AFC score Winter-Spring 2007/2008

  13. Isocost analysis – T2m Based on 61 SwissMetNet stations Calibration using reforecasts and observations from 1981-2000 No seasonal or lead-time stratification RPS Winter-Spring Dec 07-Nov 08 2AFC Winter-Spring Dec 07-Nov 08

  14. Isocost analysis – T2m 16 member DMO DMO calibr. w. 1y refcst DMO calibr. w. 20y refcst Calibrating T2m improves ensemble spread Most efficient around noon Still not enough to correct under-dispersiveness

  15. Conclusion • Forecast skill can be improved without additional (CPU) cost improved reliability, small loss in resolution • Optimal COSMO-LEPS setup ~12 members / 8 reforecast years (for 24h precipitation and temperature) But: • Some applications require large ensembles • Corresponding observations needed for calibrated values

  16. Outlook & open issues • Adapt reforecast suite for 7 km COSMO-LEPS suite, but......how should we initialize the soil of these reforecasts? • How perform alternative (and cheaper) post-processing methods vs. our calibrated reforecasts?  CONSENS • Should the reforecast project become part of the operational COSMO-LEPS suite of COSMO?

More Related