1 / 62

CENIC, PACIFIC WAVE, NLR, IEEAF: Infrastructure for Research and Education

CENIC, PACIFIC WAVE, NLR, IEEAF: Infrastructure for Research and Education. John Silvester Chair of the CENIC Board Vice-Provost for Scholarly Technology, University of Southern California. LISHEP: Digital Divide and HEPGRID Workshop Rio de Janeiro, Brasil February 19 th , 2004.

siran
Télécharger la présentation

CENIC, PACIFIC WAVE, NLR, IEEAF: Infrastructure for Research and Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CENIC, PACIFIC WAVE, NLR, IEEAF: Infrastructure for Research and Education John Silvester Chair of the CENIC BoardVice-Provost for Scholarly Technology, University of Southern California LISHEP: Digital Divide and HEPGRID Workshop Rio de Janeiro, Brasil February 19th, 2004

  2. CENIC History • CalREN and DCP • CalREN ONI • CalREN Today • National LambdaRail (aka Lightrail) • Pacific Wave • IEEAF • Pointers

  3. Education in California – Overview • University of California – 9 (10) campuses • 3 Private Research Universities – Caltech, Stanford, University of Southern California • California State University – 23 campuses • Community Colleges – over 100 • Other independent institutions of higher education – over 100 • K-12 schools – over 9000 • Various government labs and university affiliated research institutes

  4. State of Networking in 1996 • 4-CNET connected the CSU system with extension out to community colleges • Most institutions had their own commodity internet connections • UC operated some private leased lines • No statewide K-12 network • Some individual county and school district networks

  5. Impetus to Establish R&E Network in California • Expansion of the NSF Connections program to facilitate access to the super-computer centers • Broadened to allow access to the high performance backbone (vBNS) for meritorious research • Acted as a stimulus to bring the Research Universities to create a joint proposal • Two initial goals: • Reduce costs of access to high performance national networks by a collaborative approach • Facilitate communication and collaboration between institutions by building a California REesearch Network

  6. How to Proceed? • Decision that the network should be funded by the institutions rather than looking for a handout from the state or relying on Federal Government funding • Startup funds came from a joint proposal on behalf of the R-1’s to the NSF connections program (12 campuses). This allowed the institutions to ease into the burden of covering the network costs over a 3 year period • Founded a non-profit public benefit entity – CENIC – creating some separation from publicly funded entities (UC, CSU) • Lightweight organization (1.5 FTE for first 3 years)

  7. CENIC History • CalREN and DCP • CalREN ONI • CalREN Today • National LambdaRail (aka Lightrail) • Pacific Wave • IEEAF • Pointers

  8. Phase 1 - 1998

  9. CENIC Initial 4-Year Funding Charter Associates $16 M 42% CENIC Partners $2 M 5% Corporate Discounts $14 M 37% Federal Funding $6 M 16%

  10. Developments • Direct funding from UC for a central valley link to link CalREN-north (SF) and CalREN-south (LA-SD) • ISP – took advantage of the aggregated buying power to leverage ISP contracts with multiple vendors – significant savings (additional savings from Quilt pricing) • Peering – took advantage of peering opportunities at PAIX and MAE-LA • DCP – Digital California Project – extend connectivity to (public) K-12 schools

  11. Digital California Project • Funded from California State in FY 2000/01 • $32M through University of California Implementation through CENIC • Program Steering Committee - Advisory board of involved constituents from K-20 • Subsequent budget reductions -- $26M -$21M - $14M – eliminated as direct funding for 2004-05

  12. CENIC History • CalREN and DCP • CalREN ONI • CalREN Today • National LambdaRail (aka Lightrail) • Pacific Wave • IEEAF • Pointers

  13. California R&E Networks in 2000 • CALREN-2 – advanced services network, owned and operated by CENIC (Corporation for Educational Network Initiatives in California) • 4CNet – owned and operated by Cal. State University • DCP – K-12 network- owned and operated by CENIC; being implemented • Los Nettos – dark fiber based CWDM Metro network owned and operated by USC and Caltech - last of the NSFnet regionals.

  14. Phase 2 - 2000

  15. Redesigning CalREN • In late 1999, with the approaching end of current SONET contracts (late 2002), CENIC began thinking about the next generation CalREN • User demand: • Reliable ‘commodity’ network • High bandwidth (IP) network in support of research (Abilene) • Some demand for dedicated resources • Significant demand for experimental and research networks at level 3, level 2 and even level 1 • This formed the thinking for an integrated infrastructure built on dark fiber

  16. CALREN-DC Digital California • IP based network. 2.5-10 GB • Serves-140 H.E institutions; 8000+ elementary and high schools • 8.0 million+ student, faculty and staff users • I2 connectivity and commodity ISP services.

  17. CALREN-HPRHigh Performance Research Network • IP network: 10Gb, potentially several wavelengths • 50+ Research institutions, National Laboratories and San Diego Super-computing Center in California • California component of Internet2 with 10G and OC-12 connections • Serves hundreds of researchers, demanding applications

  18. CALREN-XDExperimental/Development Network • 10.0 Gb Wavelengths and Dark Fiber • Potential for Wavelength Switching and Special Network Configurations • Special applications, e.g. Teragrid • Serves Network Researchers in California Research Institutions – primarily four UC Institutes; USC’s ISI; Stanford; and Caltech

  19. CENIC History • CalREN and DCP • CalREN ONI • CalREN Today • National LambdaRail (aka Lightrail) • Pacific Wave • IEEAF • Pointers

  20. CALREN - today • 3 backbones – one commodity, one production, one research oriented, sharing physical resources where applicable • Integrated at the physical and operations level, separable at the link and network levels • Separate local solution from long-haul solution (due to different possibilities, players) • Combination of dark fiber and wavelengths

  21. CalRENBackbone NetworkPhase 3 - 2003

  22. UC Davis Sacramento Triangle Court Fergus Oakland Sunnyvale Soledad Fresno San Luis Obispo Bakersfield Los Angeles Santa Barbara Tustin San Diego CalREN Waves CalREN DC HPR Teragrid HPR & DC

  23. Digital California Overlay

  24. Campus or Metro Interconnect Calren/DC/HPR/XD POP Architecture CalRen DC HPR XD Long Haul OC48/OC192/10GigE DWDM DWDM 10 Gig E or OC192 Gig E • switch/mux CalREN/DC HPR XD 15500

  25. Historical Review of CalREN 1996 - Initial meetings 1997 - NSF proposal for CalREN2 funded; CENIC incorporated 1998 - CalREN2 operational, connect to vBNS 1999 - Connect to Abilene; ISP service launched 2000 - DCP project launched 2001 - ONI project launched; First DCP nodes operational 2002 - ONI vendors selected; DCP 90% completed 2003 - CalREN-DCP (optical edition) operational 2004 - CalREN-HPR operational 2004 - Pacific Wave linkup 2004 - XD links operational as NLR comes up

  26. CENIC History • CalREN and DCP • CalREN ONI • CalREN Today • National LambdaRail (aka Lightrail) • Pacific Wave • IEEAF • Pointers

  27. Expanding the reach? • Multi-State interest in a larger geographic fiber based infrastructure • Fiber vendor very interested in selling National footprint

  28. National Light Rail - concept • Dark Fiber National footprint • Serves very high-end experimental and research applications including network research • 4 - 10GB Wavelengths initially • Capable of 40 10Gb wavelengths at build-out • Partnership model (including corporate partners)

  29. Many different perspectives • “NLR… … aims to reenergize innovative R&D into next generation networking technologies, protocols, services, and apps.” … is a virtual laboratory.” … will contribute to the (NSF) Cyberinfrastructure that is critical to progress in every field of science & engineering.” … will help fuel the growth of the TeraGrid and computational science in general.” … motivates our planned regional optical network.” … is a hedge timed to hit the trough of the Internet/telecom economy.” … is both an experimental facility and a complex, multi-dimensional experiment in and of itself.” ALL OF THE ABOVE!

  30. Distinguishing features - I • NLR, Inc. has been established as a non-profit organization (May 2003, 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status being sought) • Partnership with industry (CISCO is a major partner/contributor with special interest in promoting network research) • Largest higher-ed owned/managed optical networking & research facility in the world • ~10,000 route-miles of dark fiber (Level 3) • Four 10-Gbps ’s provisioned at outset • First & foremost, an experimental platform for research • Optical, switching & network layers • Research committee (with 2 board seats) • Experimental support center • 50% of capacity available for network research

  31. Distinguishing features - II • Sparse backbone’ topology • Use of high speed Ethernet for WAN transport • 1O Gigabit Ethernet LAN PHY is primary interface • Traditional OC-192 SONET available, too • Additional ’s (up to 40 on a given segment) can be provisioned with pricing tied to incremental cost • Unprecedented level of self-capitalization for national networking initiative by higher ed participants • ~$80M budget for full national backbone (CapEx + 5-yrs OpEx) • Each contribution (typically $5M) assumed to be ‘sunk cost’ • Each participant/node has concurrent responsibility for developing optical networking capabilities and sustaining performance in their region

  32. CENIC Pacific Northwest Gigapop Pittsburgh SC Duke Univ./NCLR MATP/Va. Tech Cisco Systems Internet2 Florida LambdaRail Georgia Tech CIC Pending: Texas Consortium New York Area Consortium Mountain region consortium Current Members and Associates

  33. NLR Project Segment Deployment Schedule (approx) • Chicago to Pittsburgh 11/03 • Sunnyvale to Seattle 4/04 • Pittsburgh to Washington DC 3/04 • Washington DC to Atlanta 5/04 • Atlanta to Jacksonville 8/04 • Seattle to Denver 7/04 • Denver to Chicago 8/04

  34. Related Developments • O(10k) miles of dark fiber have been acquired by the community for national and regional optical networks by CENIC, FiberCo (via Level 3), and others. • ATT makes major donation of fiber to USA Waves • The Abilene Network has been upgraded to a 10-Gbps backbone and supports the research university community through initiatives such as IPv6 deployment and the Observatory. • Internet2 plans to use one NLR wave for development of HOPI (hybrid optical packet interconnect)

  35. CENIC History • CalREN and DCP • CalREN ONI • CalREN Today • National LambdaRail (aka Lightrail) • Pacific Wave • IEEAF • Pointers

  36. U.S. Pacific Coast Peering Collaboration • CENIC (Corporation for Education Network Initiatives in California) and PNWGP (Pacific Northwest Gigapop) have combined efforts to create an advanced, extended peering facility on the U.S. West Coast. • Concept: an extensible, geographically dispersed peering fabric • Result: you connect at any one location on the fabric and have the option to peer with any other participant, regardless of where they are connected

  37. Current Model

  38. Summer 2004 - LA & Seattle

  39. Multi-Node Pacific Wave • The Pacific Wave International Peering exchange facility will offer connection points initially in Los Angeles and Seattle, proximal to submarine cable landing sites on the U.S. Pacific Coast. • Connection points to be connected by 10GE link derived from NLR • Expected operation by Summer 2004

  40. Future?

  41. CENIC History • CalREN and DCP • CalREN ONI • CalREN Today • National LambdaRail (aka Lightrail) • Pacific Wave • IEEAF • Pointers

  42. New Public-Private Partnerships • Global telecomm build-out of technical infrastructure provides new possibilities for economic development • Current market conditions have resulted in capacity which is currently going unused -- cannot be sold. • As a matter of social responsibility, this unused capacity could be made available for stimulating future applications and markets -- by donation for use by research and education institutions.

  43. Example: IEEAF • The IEEAF represents one such partnership whose goal is to obtain donations of international bandwidth to enable a global collaboration in research and education. • Current donations have already linked US and Europe, and are linking US and Asia-Pacific. • This bandwidth helps enable global collaborations in research and education, in the true spirit of the Global Quilt Initiative.

  44. IEEAF Vision: The Global Quilt • A Network of Networks, “stitched together” to create a common single fabric, and shared equally by all. This will be achieved through collaboration and community effort, until it covers the globe. • The IEEAF has no boundaries of “home” territory…..

  45. IEEAF - What is it? • U.S. 501.c.3 Not-for-profit corporation • Formed from original MOU between GEO and CENIC (Corporation for Educational Networking in California) • Vision: Accelerate the global growth of advanced networking (Internet2) to achieve "universal educational access” to: • Enable and stimulate the rapid expansion of research and educational collaboration in many forms between teaching and learning institutions around the world. • Cultivate and promote practical solutions to delivering scalable, universally available and equitable access to suitable bandwidth and necessary network resources in support of these collaborations.

  46. IEEAF - How does it work? • Leverage global deregulation and new entrants into telco business • Leverage private sector business relationships • Geographic Network Affiliates, Inc. (GEO) • Build donations into business deals (contracts) such as no-cost IRUs

  47. IEEAF - What does it do? • Gets donated communications related assets • Makes them available to existing institutions and networking organizations to put to work • Vehicle: Asset Steward Agreement

More Related