1 / 13

Meeting AYP and Generating API:

Meeting AYP and Generating API:. Preventing “Leakage”. “Leakage” AYP. Two Reasons AYP is not met: 1. Failure to move Basic students to Proficiency. 2. Having students “ leak ” multiple quintile levels out of proficiency. Figure #2- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts.

sivan
Télécharger la présentation

Meeting AYP and Generating API:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Meeting AYP and Generating API: Preventing “Leakage”

  2. “Leakage”AYP • Two Reasons AYP is not met: • 1. Failure to move Basic students to Proficiency. • 2. Having students “leak” multiple quintile levels out of proficiency.

  3. Figure #2- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts

  4. “Checking for Leaks”: • Fleming Middle School • Spring 2004 to Spring 2005 CST results • Targeted Intervention Program in Math • 50 students moved to CST proficiency • 60 students move out of CST proficiency • Net Growth of Proficient students in Math: -10

  5. “Leakage”API • Two Main Reasons API drops: • 1. Failure to move students from Far Below Basic to Below Basic. • 2. Having students “leak” multiple quintile levels.

  6. Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings and Weights Quintile API Weights 5 1000 4 875 3 700 2 500 1 200 Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic

  7. Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings and Weights Quintile API Weights 5 1000 4 875 3 700 2 500 1 200 Numbers of Students 100 Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 200 400 200 100

  8. Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: • Quintile Rankings and Weights • Quintile API Weights Gain in API Weight • 5 1000 125 • 4 875 175 • 3 700 200 • 2 500 300 • 1 200 N/A Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic

  9. Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts API For Academic Performance Index (API), greatest gains will occur when moving students from the lowest CST levels due to weighting factors.

  10. Preventing “Leaks”: • Early monitoring of proficient and above students with the periodic assessments in ELA and Math. • Provide early differentiated instruction for struggling proficient students.

  11. Checking for “Leaks”: Elementary Prevent Leakage: Elementary CST Comparison Data. Procedure to create an SIS report which compares two or more years of CST data for individual students. Type/Press: Main Screen- #7 Testing Menu-#4 CST Menu-#2 Current Teacher Report All or Specific Room- Press Enter

  12. Checking for “Leaks”: Secondary ID99,2 <F1> (current year) <F2> <F10> <F2> “1” (for active) (enter today’s date) <F2> <F2> <F2> “2” (select by class number) “Y” (enter by district course #) 310102 – Grade 6 Math 310104 - Grade 7 Math 310302 – Algebra I 310318 – Algebra Readiness <F2> (proceed to next step) “T” (sort by teacher) Press enter (Do start a new page or switch to Don’t) <F4> (create a new report) Type in title, then enter

  13. Wade Hayashida Categorical Program Coordinator Local District 8 310 354 3416 wade.hayashida@lausd.net

More Related