1 / 30

SHARED SAVINGS & INCENTIVE PAYMENT PROGRAMS

SHARED SAVINGS & INCENTIVE PAYMENT PROGRAMS. Ellen V. Weissman Hodgson Russ LLP www.hodgsonruss.com. OVERVIEW. Legal Constraints In Structuring Federal State Recent Developments 15 Favorable OIG Advisory Opinions Proposed Stark Exception What Can You Do Now ? Federal Health Reform???.

snow
Télécharger la présentation

SHARED SAVINGS & INCENTIVE PAYMENT PROGRAMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SHARED SAVINGS & INCENTIVE PAYMENT PROGRAMS Ellen V. WeissmanHodgson Russ LLP www.hodgsonruss.com

  2. OVERVIEW • Legal Constraints In Structuring • Federal • State • Recent Developments • 15 Favorable OIG Advisory Opinions • Proposed Stark Exception • What Can You Do Now? • Federal Health Reform??? © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  3. FEDERAL LAWS • Civil Monetary Penalty Law (CMPL) • Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) • Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark) • Tax Exemption Laws • Managed Care © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  4. CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY LAW • Prohibits: Hospitals Knowingly Making A Payment To A Physician To Induce A Reduction Or Limitation In Services To Medicare/Medicaid FFS Beneficiaries • Applies Even If Pay To Reduce Services That Are Not “Medically Necessary” • OIG Enforces, Issues Advisory Opinions © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  5. ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE • Prohibits: Knowingly/Willfully Paying Or Receiving Remuneration To Induce Referrals Of Services Covered By Federal Health Programs • No Safe Harbor On Gainsharing – To Date • OIG Enforces, Issues Advisory Opinions © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  6. STARK STATUTE : PHYSICIAN SELF-REFERRAL LAW • Prohibits: Physicians Referring Medicare & Medicaid Patients To Hospital For Inpatient And Outpatient Services If Financial Relationship With Hospital, Unless Within Exception • Proposed CMS Exception • CMS Enforces, No Advisory Opinions © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  7. TAX EXEMPTION LAWS • Tax Exempt Hospitals May Not Pay Physicians If Would Constitute: • Private Inurement • Private Benefit Or • Excess Benefit Transaction • IRS Guidance: Generally OK If “Reasonable Compensation” © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  8. MANAGED CARE • CMPL Is Not Applicable To Managed Care • Medicare/Medicaid Managed Care Risk-Based Payors Are Covered By Different Statutes • Allows “Physician Incentive Plans” If They Do Not Reduce “Medically Necessary” Services © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  9. MANAGED CARE, cont. • Stark Is Applicable (If Serve Medicare/Medicaid Enrollees) • Stark Exceptions: • 42 CFR 411.355(c) – Protects Services Provided To Enrollees Of Medicare/Medicaid MCOs • 42 CFR 411.357(n) – Protects Risk-Sharing Compensation Arrangements Between MCOs And Physicians, If No AKS Violation © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  10. MANAGED CARE, cont. • If Commercial Insurer, Flexibility In Structuring Unless: • Induce Changes Re Medicare/Medicaid FFS Patients • Measure/Pay Based On All Patients • Involve Dually Eligible Patients • See OIG Advisory Opinion No. 08-16. © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  11. STATE LAWS • Some States Have Laws That Apply To All Payors • Including Medicare And Medicaid Managed Care Payors/Beneficiaries • Many State Statutes Have DifferentExceptions From Stark • If Your Hospital Operates In A State With An All-Payor Statute, Structure Carefully © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  12. WAIVER AUTHORITY • General CMS Authority: Waives Stark, But Not AKS or CMPL. • SeeRobert Wood Johnson University Hospital v. Thompson, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8498 (D.N.J. Apr. 15, 2004) • Statutory Demonstration Projects: Waive Stark, AKS and CMPL: • MMA of 2003 § 646 • Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 § 5007 © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  13. OIG GUIDANCE • Addresses CMPL And AKS • Does Not Address Stark, Because OIG Lacks Jurisdiction © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  14. OIG SPECIAL ADVISORY BULLETIN (1999) • All Gainsharing Programs Violate CMPL • No Authority To Issue Exception To CMPL • Declines To Issue Advisory Opinions • Has Since Issued 14 Favorable Opinions • AHA/AAMC Recently Asked OIG To Retract © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  15. OIG CONCERNS • “Stinting” On Patient Care • “Cherry-Picking” Healthy Patients • “Steering” Sicker Patients To Hospitals Not In Program • Disguised Payments for Referrals © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  16. OIG ADVISORY OPINIONS • 15 Favorable Advisory Opinions • 14 Shared Savings Programs • 1 Pay For Performance Program • Shared Savings Programs: • Product Standardization Or Substitution • Use As Needed • All Contain Similar Elements • OIG Finds CMPL Implicated, But Declines To Prosecute Due To Safeguards © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  17. CMPL SAFEGUARDS • Credible Medical Evidence Supports Each Performance Measure/Target • Targets Based On Hospital’s Patient Population Compared To Regional/National Norms • All Supplies/Devices Remain Available If Needed For Particular Patient • Floors Below Which Cannot Earn Incentive • Independent Review; Termination Of Physicians • Written Disclosure To Patients © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  18. AKS SAFEGUARDS • Pools Of 5 Or More Physicians • On Active Medical Staff • Per Capita Payment • Limits On Amounts To Be Earned • Re-Basing If Multi-Year • Limited Duration (1-3 Years) • Monitor Admissions For Changes © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  19. OIG ADVISORY OPINION 08-16PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE • Private Insurer Pays Bonus To Hospital • Hospital Pays 50% of Bonus To Physicians • 2 Data Reporting Targets • 4 Quality Targets – CMS Specifications Manual For Nat’l Hospital Quality Measures • CMPL Implicated Because Measure Performance Using All Inpatients • OIG Issues Favorable Opinion Due To Safeguards © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  20. PROPOSED STARK EXCEPTION • Proposed 7/7/08 In MPFS 2009 • Shared Savings & Incentive Payment Programs • 16 Sections, Over 40 Requirements • Requirements Similar To OIG Advisory Opinion Elements • CMS Reopened Comment Period to 2/17/09 • Sought Comments On 55 Issues • One vs Two New Exceptions? © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  21. COMMENTS BY AHA/AAMC • Proposed Exception Is Too Complex, Burdensome, Narrow, Inflexible • Instead, Adopt Broad Principles: • Credible Medical Evidence Supports Targets • Monitoring Inappropriate Actions • Reward Individual Physician’s Contributions • Maintain Documentation Of Design/Payments • Legally Binding Written Agreement © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  22. COMMENTS BY NJHA • Proposed Exception Too Narrow • Instead: Restructure To Address • Programs Designed To Reduce Operational Bottlenecks • Responsible Physicians • Direct Protections for Quality of Care and Against Self-Referral vs Micromanagement © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  23. COST FINDING • CMS: Current Cost Less Acquisition Cost • Problem: CMS Proposal Doesn’t Work For Programs Targeting Operational Improvements Or Quality • Alternative: Use APR DRGs With Severity Of Illness Adjustment © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  24. PHYSICIANS/PAYMENT • CMS: Requires Pool Of At Least 5 Physicians And Per Capita Payment • Problem: Artificial Groups; Diffuses Incentive • Alternative: Pay Individual Physicians Responsible For Managing A Case To Reward Individual Performance; Address Concerns Relating To Abuse Directly Rather Than Indirectly © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  25. RE-BASING TARGETS • CMS: If Multi-Year Program, Must Re-Base Targets At End Of Year To Avoid “Duplicate” Payment/Disguised Payment For Referral • Alternative: Reward Maintaining Good Performance As Well As Improvement; Important To Incentivize Physicians To Spend Time On Non-Billable Activities Such as Discharge Planning © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  26. QUALITY PROTECTIONS • CMS: Micromanagement, such as requiring access to same supplies/devices available before program and no limits on new technology • Alternatives: • Add Severity Of Illness Adjustment • Best Practice Norms Based On Community Practice Compared To Regional Data • Committee Monitors “Outliers”; Can Withhold Incentives Or Terminate Physician © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  27. SELF-REFERRAL PROTECTIONS • CMS: Currently On Medical Staff, plus Many Indirect Protections • Alternative: Direct Protections Such As • Must Have 10+ Admissions At Par Hospital • If Dual Privileges, Cap Incentives At Prior Year Volume At Participating Hospital, Adjusted for Normal Practice Growth © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  28. CURRENT OPTIONS • If No Medicare/Medicaid FFS Beneficiaries • Flexibility In Structuring A Program • Determine Whether To Include Managed Care Beneficiaries • Determine Whether State Laws Apply © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  29. CURRENT OPTIONS • If Medicare/Medicaid FFS Beneficiaries • Use Existing Safe Harbors/Exceptions • Follow Design Features Approved In OIG Advisory Opinions • Participate In CMS Demonstration Project © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

  30. THE FUTURE • CMPL: Will Congress modify to allow incentive programs allowed by Managed Care statute? • Stark: New Exceptions May Be Added & Existing Exceptions May Be Modified • AKS: Will HHS Heed The Call Of The AHA/AAMC To Issue A Regulatory Exception? • Demonstration Projects: Reports To Congress Due Soon; Will They Prompt Changes? • Federal Healthcare Reform:??? © 2009 Hodgson Russ LLP

More Related