1 / 6

Land Grabbing in Eastern Europe the former SU and Central Asia

Land Grabbing in Eastern Europe the former SU and Central Asia. Competing Views and Strategies on Global Land Grabbing – Side-event on the occassion of the 36th session of the World Committee on Food Security, co-organized with IPC & TNI Oane Visser Radboud University Nijmegen, NL Max Spoor

sofia
Télécharger la présentation

Land Grabbing in Eastern Europe the former SU and Central Asia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Land Grabbing in Eastern Europe the former SU and Central Asia Competing Views and Strategies on Global Land Grabbing – Side-event on the occassion of the 36th session of the World Committee on Food Security, co-organized with IPC & TNI Oane Visser Radboud University Nijmegen, NL Max Spoor Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, NL

  2. Introduction Land grabbing debate: • focus on Africa,also Latin-America, Asia. • ignorance of post-Soviet Eurasia

  3. Introduction (2): Post-Soviet Eurasia • Focus on: Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan • Large deals • Central questions: • What is the magnitude of the process? • What kind of investors are involved? • What are the socio-economic consequences? (esp. access to land)

  4. Propects for agriculture in the region • Short term: • abundance of unused & underutilized land • low land prices • potential for sharp increase in yields • infrastructure (Black-Earth, Siberia) • Long term: • climate change • water resources

  5. Land acquisitions: • Domestic investors: • 1990s: privatisation, economic decline • End 1990s/ early 2000s: energy companies • 2002 onwards: industrial & trade companies • Type of international investors: • Ukraine & European Russia: Western companies, Gulf countries • Siberia & Kazakhstan: Asian countries (China, S-Korea, Japan) • Difference in strategy (type of investor, workforce) • Magnitude: • large-scale land acquisitions (Domestic, International)

  6. Tensions and downsides: • Ownership issues • 1990s privatisation: rural population got land rights, but farm units remained large-scale • No physical distribution, registration, contracts • Land code: rush for land • Semi-legal lease and ownership • Illegal land acquisitions • More secure ownership rights as solution?

More Related