1 / 22

Introduction 1/2

Assimilation of autoscaled data and regional and local ionospheric models as input source for a real-time 3-D IRI modeling: additional and planned tests. M. Pezzopane a , M. Pietrella a , A. Pignatelli a , A. Settimi a , C. Scotto a , B. Zolesi a , C. Bianchi a , Lj. R. Cander b

sol
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction 1/2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assimilation of autoscaled data and regional and local ionospheric models as input source for a real-time 3-D IRI modeling: additional and planned tests M. Pezzopane a, M. Pietrella a, A. Pignatelli a, A. Settimi a, C. Scotto a, B. Zolesi a, C. Bianchi a, Lj. R. Cander b a Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia b Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK michael.pezzopane@ingv.it

  2. Introduction 1/2 Ionospheric models are important for providing a comprehensive specification of the three-dimensional (3-D) electron density of the ionosphere; the International Reference Ionosphere is the de facto international standard for the climatological specification of ionospheric parameters; although global models of the F2 layer critical frequency foF2 and propagation factor M(3000)F2, such as those of the CCIR and the URSI, represent a valid input source for a 3-D modeling of the ionosphere, regional and local models of these ionospheric characteristics can be important to catch some features that may be easily neglected in global models; moreover, in the light of a real-time modeling of the ionosphere, in the last decades we have appreciated the valuable data source represented by the modern real-time ionosonde observations.

  3. Introduction 2/2 real-time autoscaled foF2 and M(3000)F2 data and real-time electron density profiles local/regional nowcasting maps of foF2 and M(3000)F2 real-time 3-D electron density modeling [Pezzopane et al., Radio Sci., 2011]

  4. Input sources of the model 1/2 Autoscaling of vertical soundings ARTIST [Huang and Reinisch, Radio Sci., 1983; Galkin and Reinisch, INAG bulletin, 2008] [Pezzopane and Scotto, Radio Sci., 2007] Autoscala

  5. Input sources of the model 2/2 SIRMUP procedure [Zolesi et al., Radio Sci., 2004; Tsagouri et al., JASTP, 2005] is based on the idea that real-time values of foF2 and M(3000)F2 at one location can be determined from the climatological SIRM model [Zolesi et al., Radio Sci.,1996] by using an effective sunspot number (Reff) based on real-time ionosonde observations instead of the smoothed sunspot number R12. The method of determining Reff was introduced by Houminer et al. [JEEE, 1993]. Reff is chosen to give the best fit between the SIRM model calculation and real measurements obtained from a grid of ionosondes located in the mapping area. The SIRMUP has the capability to generate the real-time updated foF2 and M(3000)F2 values on a user-specified spatial grid.

  6. Description of the model

  7. Assimilation process of the measured electron density profiles 1/2

  8. Assimilation process of the measured electron density profiles 2/2

  9. Validation results 1/4

  10. Validation results 2/4 quasi-stationary conditions around noon

  11. Validation results 3/4 solar terminator conditions around sunrise

  12. Validation results 4/4

  13. Additional tests 1/5

  14. positive phase negative phase Additional tests 2/5

  15. positive phase negative phase Additional tests 3/5

  16. Additional tests 4/5 disturbed conditions – positive ionospheric phase

  17. Additional tests 5/5 disturbed conditions – negative ionospheric phase

  18. Further planned tests 1/4 1) Testing the model on additional disturbed periods;

  19. Further planned tests 2/4 1) Testing the model on additional disturbed periods; 2) using more than two reference ionospheric stations;

  20. Further planned tests 3/4 1) Testing the model on additional disturbed periods; 2) using more than two reference ionospheric stations; 3) use of a ray tracing technique to synthesize oblique ionograms on the basis of the IRI-SIRMUP-P 3D electron density matrix. The MUFs of these synthetic ionograms will be then compared with the MUFs of recorded oblique ionograms;

  21. Further planned tests 4/4 1) Testing the model on additional disturbed periods; 2) using more than two reference ionospheric stations; 3) use of a ray tracing technique to synthesize oblique ionograms on the basis of the IRI-SIRMUP-P 3D electron density matrix. The MUFs of these synthetic ionograms will be then compared with the MUFs of recorded oblique ionograms; 4) use of other foF2/M(3000)F2 regional models in order to test the 3-D model at different regions.

  22. Thank you

More Related