1 / 14

Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke

Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Ertelt , D., Small, S., Solodkin , A., Dettmers,C ., McNamara, A., Binkofski, F., & Buccinod, G. (2007). NeuroImage, 36, 164-173. Recovery Strategies. Constraint Induced Therapy

sophie
Télécharger la présentation

Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation ofmotor deficits after stroke Ertelt, D., Small, S., Solodkin, A., Dettmers,C., McNamara, A.,Binkofski, F., & Buccinod,G. (2007). NeuroImage, 36, 164-173.

  2. Recovery Strategies • Constraint Induced Therapy • Motor Relearning Program • Repetitive Arm Training Alternative Strategy • Based on observation/imagery activated mirror neuron system

  3. Aim and Hypothesis The major aim of this study was to assess whether action observation therapy may lead to clinical improvement of motor impairment in chronic stroke patients, as measured by standard functional scales. p165 Our hypothesis was that the activation of motor areas by action observation becomes reinforced by the concomitant active execution of the observed actions Studied the reorganization within the motor areas following this treatment,

  4. FrenchayArm Test—FAT (Max: 5) Wolf Motor Function Test—WMFT Stroke Impact Scale—SIS (10 domains)

  5. Treatment and Control • 6 min observation of object manipulation** • 6 min of practice with paretic UL • Rehab session lasted 90 min • Eighteen sessions for 18 consecutive working days • 54 videos (3 different actions increasing in complexity each day – each shown twice) • 3 different viewing perspectives ** geometric shapes and letters

  6. Assessment(WMFT, FAT, SIS, fMRI*) • 14 days pre-treatment • 1 day before treatment* • Day after treatment* • 8 weeks after treatment

  7. Aims and Key Findings The major aim of this study was to assess whether action observation therapy may lead to clinical improvement of motor impairment in chronic stroke patients, as measured by standard functional scales. p165 We could demonstrate that the new rehabilitation program combining action observation with intensive repetitive practice of the observed actions provides a significant improvement of motor functions, and this in chronic stroke patients with a well established motor impairment of the upper limb

  8. Aims and Key Findings Study the reorganization within the motor areas following this treatment, manual exploration of objects revealed an increase of activation following the rehabilitation treatment in a network of areas (bilateral ventral premotor cortex, bilateral superior temporal gyrus, supplementary motor area (SMA) and contralateralsupramarginalgyrus) which build up the action observation/action execution matching system (mirror neuron system). This finding suggests that the improved motor skills in our patients were associated with reactivation of a physiological network of motor areas, where motor representations of trained actions are known to be present. But, far more important was the investigation of the effects of the action observation therapy on brain activations. These effect were found by comparing in the experimental group activations related to object manipulation with the affected hand before entering the study and soon after its end. This contrast showed that the motor improvement in the patients of the experimental group was related to an increased activation in a network of areas consisting of bilateral ventral premotor and inferior parietal areas (supposedly containing the mirror neuron system) plus bilateral superior temporal gyrus, supplementary motor area (SMA) and contralateralsupramarginalgyrus

  9. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that human PMv is the homologue of monkey area F4, and human area 44 is the homologue of monkey area F5. (from Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004. 27:169–92) PMv and pars opercularis

More Related