1 / 67

Zonation analysis types and setups

Zonation analysis types and setups. Atte Moilanen, Joona Lehtomäki, Heini Kujala, Federico Montesino Pouzols, Jarno Leppänen & Laura Meller C-BIG - Conservation Biology Informatics Group Dept. of Biosciences, University of Helsinki http://cbig.it.helsinki.fi. Contents. Basic analyses

spencer
Télécharger la présentation

Zonation analysis types and setups

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Zonation analysis types and setups Atte Moilanen, Joona Lehtomäki, Heini Kujala, Federico Montesino Pouzols, Jarno Leppänen & Laura Meller C-BIG - Conservation Biology Informatics Group Dept. of Biosciences, University of Helsinki http://cbig.it.helsinki.fi

  2. Contents • Basic analyses • Connectivity • Uncertainty • Community/ecosystem level approaches • Advanced analyses • Data size issues • Limitations of Zonation

  3. Zonation - Basic analyses • Identification of “optimal” reserve networks • Identification of least valuable areas • Expansion of conservation area networks • Evaluation of conservation areas • Replacement cost

  4. B1. Identification of optimal reserves • The most ”traditional” function of any reserve selection method • Basic question: Where to protect?

  5. B1: Optimal areas = basic Zonation analysis These schematics are in the manual Several examples in the tutorial Look for areas with highest priority

  6. Zonation • Produces a hierarchical zoning of a landscape • looking for priority sites for conservation • aiming at species persistence

  7. Area needed to achieve 30% of sp distributions Basic output 1 • Map of landscape showing the ranking (cell removal levels)

  8. 10% top fraction Basic output 2 • Curves: performance of features (or groups) at different levels of cell removal (these curves correspond 1-1 to the rank map)

  9. B2. Identification of least valuable areas • Ecologically least valuable = where economic activity disturbs biodiversity least = impact avoidance

  10. B2: least valuable = basic Zonation analysis Look for areas with lowest priority

  11. Balancing between competing land-uses carbon (+) agri (-) biodiversity (+) urban (-)

  12. ... all can be put in the same analysis… produces separation of conservation and other land uses

  13. Alternative land uses Note negative weights

  14. B4. Extending conservation area networks • Usually conservation does not start from scratch • Uses hierarchical mask layer to enforce hierarchy into ranking • When present PAs are at top rank category, highest ranked areas outside PAs identify optimal and balanced CAN expansion

  15. Extending conservation area networks Force Inclusion of PAs Tutorial example: do_rs.bat

  16. Aligning conservation priorities in Madagascar

  17. Plan of extension of Madagascar protected areas to 10% • Most extensive example of conservation prioritization at the time • + Extensive surrogacy analysis Kremen, Cameron, Moilanen, Phillips, Thomas et al. 2008 Science 320: 222-226.

  18. Proposed extension from present 6.3% PAs • All major taxa • 2315 endemic species • Entire country at 0.7 km2 resolution • Existingreserves missed 28% of species

  19. B3. Evaluating a proposed network of sites • Comparison between ”what is” and ”what could be, ideally” • Zonation specific way: replacement cost analysis

  20. Replacement cost analysis • Situation where areas need to be forcibly included to or excluded from the final solution • Eg. evaluation of existing or proposed reserves • Forced inclusion of poor areas entails a cost to biodiversity • Broader interpretation: difference between ideal free and constrained solution

  21. B4: Evaluating a conservation area network Tutorial example: do_rs.bat (compare with and without mask)

  22. Replacement cost analysis Optimal solution Forced solution Proposed reserves

  23. Replacement cost analysis • Calculate biologically optimal solution • Force in areas that mustto be protected orforce out areas that cannot be protected • Re-optimize under constraint and calculate the difference in cost/benefit

  24. Replacement cost analysis:New Zealand revisited Leathwick et al. Conservation Letters, 2008

  25. Performance curve for ideal solution Proportion of species distribution protected COST = loss in biological value Curve for forced solution Proportion of cells removed Replacement cost analysis Leathwick et al. Conservation Letters, 2008

  26. Replacement cost analysis:New Zealand EEZ Leathwick et al. Conservation Letters, 2008

  27. 5. Connectivity • Zonation includesmanyways of accounting for connectivity

  28. Accounting for Connectivity • Qualitative /structural • Edge removal • Boundary length penalty: do_blp.bat • Feature-specific • Distribution smoothing: do_ds.bat • Boundary Quality Penalty: do_bqp.bat • Neighborhood Quality Penalty: do_nqp.bat • Interactionconnectivity • Pairwise interaction • Matrixconnectivity (many-to-oneinteraction) • Path-like connectivity; corridors • In Zonation 4 – coming soon! • Connectivity in environmental space • In Zonation 4 – coming soon!

  29. Accounting for connectivity: Distribution smoothing Original distribution Connectivity distribution Tutorial example: do_ds.bat

  30. Accounting for connectivity:Distribution smoothing No aggregation Using distribution smoothing Top 20% (color) is scrappy Top 20% well connected

  31. Accounting for connectivity: Boundary quality penalty (BQP) • Species-specific decrease in local quality due to proximity of reserve boundary • Forces connectivity only where needed. • Allows fragmentation where it does not hurt Tutorial example: do_bqp.bat

  32. focal cell large buffer small buffer Accounting for connectivity: Boundary quality penalty (BQP) Strong effect of neighboring habitat loss Small effect of neighboring habitat loss

  33. 7 species of interest Hierarchical priorities Hunter Valley, Australia Moilanen and Wintle 2006 Accounting for connectivity:Boundary Quality Penalty (BQP)

  34. Distributions Accounting for connectivity:Boundary Quality Penalty (BQP)

  35. Accounting for connectivity:Neighborhood Quality Penalty (NQP) NQP = extension of BQP to operate on planning units (e.g catchments), linked to tree structures (freshwater systems) Connectivity responses upstream and downstream Tutorial example: do_nqp.bat

  36. Directed freshwater connectivity

  37. Freshwater planning accounting for hydrological connectivity of catchments + condition Rivers in New Zealand Core-area Zonation + connectivity Moilanen, Leathwick & Elith. Freshwater Biology 2008. Leathwick et al. Biological Conservation 2010.

  38. Interaction connectivityconnectivity between two distributions • Between two features (Rayfield et al. 2009) • Same species; different time steps (Carrol et al. 2010) • Positive (resource-consumer) or negative

  39. Single-species prioritization

  40. Ecological interactions in Zonation, phase 1Inter- and intraspeciesconnectivitiesresult in aggregatedsolution Conservation areas for the Marten in Canada Rayfield et al. 2009. Ecological Modelling.

  41. 3. Uncertainty in inputs • Uncertainty is pervasive in ecological data, including spatial data about occurrence levels of biodiversity features Simple solution: give low weigth to uncertain data • 2 types of uncertainty analyses: • Robustness • Opportunity • Requires additional rasters: distribution of uncertainty in feature distributions

  42. Uncertainty analysis Conservation value HIGH LOW LOW HIGH Certainty of information Opportunity Robustness requirement

  43. Uncertainty analysis Tutorial example: do_uc.bat

  44. Uncertainty analysis:Distribution discounting Discounted distribution Distribution model Error or relative uncertainty surface

  45. 4. Community-level analysis Species are common biodiversity features, but many analyses can be productively done at the level of community / ecosystem / environment type Tutorial example: do_comm_similarity.bat

  46. Community-level analysis The catch: communities / ecosystems are not completely dissimilar, which should be accounted for!

  47. Combined communities and species analysis

  48. Similarity expansion

  49. Community classification and similarity expansion:Riverine communities in New Zealand WITH similarity expansion WITHOUT similarity expansion • Macroinvertebrate and fish species used for modelling community turnover (GDM) • Similarity expansion • Or, matrix connectivity accounting for similarity • Directed connectivity (NQP) Leathwick et al. Biological Conservation 2010.

  50. 5.1. Prioritization across multiple administrative regions • Different administrative regions may have different priorities • But connectivity extends across borders • Representation of species may be considered across multiple spatial scales

More Related