1 / 52

Nathan Johnson Georgia Tech  Architect

Hans Verheij Owner. Justin Schmidt University of Wisconsin – Madison  Construction. Nathan Johnson Georgia Tech  Architect. John Swallow University of Manchester  Engineer. Noor Atari Stanford  Engineer. Megan Folkmann Stanford  Engineer. Site Location.

stefanit
Télécharger la présentation

Nathan Johnson Georgia Tech  Architect

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hans Verheij Owner Justin Schmidt University of Wisconsin – Madison  Construction Nathan Johnson Georgia Tech  Architect John Swallow University of Manchester  Engineer Noor Atari Stanford  Engineer Megan Folkmann Stanford  Engineer

  2. Site Location University of New Mexico -Educational Building -Urban Environment -Environmentally Sensitive Cactus Grove -Sustainable Design -Existing Footprint Existing Footprint - The ‘L’ Shape

  3. Decision Matrix

  4. Key Challenges Floor Height -Atrium • Site Constraints • -Cacti, size Structural System -Materials • MEP System • -Lack of technical knowledge

  5. Site Diagram Circulation Cores Building Footprint Internal Atrium Entrance Paths A Building as an Open Mind

  6. First Floor First Floor Auditorium Bathrooms Large Classrooms Glass Curtain Wall

  7. Second Floor Communal Student Offices Computer Labs Small Classrooms Glass Curtain Wall Bathrooms

  8. Third Floor Faculty Offices Seminar / Meeting Room Admin. / Secretary Faculty Lounge Bathrooms

  9. Basement Plan Storage Mechanical room Elevator Room Computer Machine Room

  10. Section 1 2nd Floor Plan 1st 3rd 2nd

  11. Section 2 2nd Floor Plan 3rd 1st 2nd

  12. Renderings View From Cornell Drive Interior Views

  13. Renderings View From Cactus Grove

  14. Structural Grid

  15. Moment Resisting Frames

  16. Structural Modeling SAP MRF - 27’ Bay SAP MRF - 18’ Bay

  17. Connection Details

  18. Queen Post Truss Queen Post

  19. Albuquerque Geology • GIVEN INFORMATION: • Compact sandy, silty material • Allowable bearing • pressure ~ 4KSF • Upper layers are • predominantly of a • sedimentary material

  20. Albuquerque Groundwater

  21. Foundation Load TOTAL FACTORED LOADINGS: Concrete 3334 K Steel 406 K Cladding 1044 K Live Load 1566 K TOTAL LOADING: 6350 k

  22. Foundation Load Information Theoretical area of foundation required: 6350 K / 4 KSF = 1587 square feet Based on an assumed 5’ wide strip/pad foundation, actual area of foundation provided = 3305 square feet Provided area of foundation is acceptable

  23. Basement Floor Plan

  24. Sub Surface Columns & Strips/Pads

  25. Retaining Walls

  26. Atrium Glass Wall GSW Headquarters, Berlin

  27. Glass Wall Details 18” GSW Headquarters, Berlin

  28. Adobe Panels Single 6’ Panel Detail Section

  29. Adobe Panel Fixing Prefabricated beams used to hang the Adobe panels

  30. AEC Interaction / Design Evolution

  31. MEP System Overview

  32. MEP System Overview

  33. MEP System Overview

  34. MEP Daily Cycle

  35. MEP Floor by Floor

  36. Site Location

  37. Site Layout & Access

  38. Site Layout

  39. Equipment Selection • Rough Terrain Crane • 83 ft boom • Outriggers fully extended at furthest pick • Geothermal Boring Rig • Extend to 300’

  40. Budget Final Budget $7,062,194 Back to Present Value at 3% Inflation Invested with 5% Rate of Return

  41. Estimate Total Cost: $8,294,824

  42. Estimate Night Sky System, 2.4% Plumbing, 1.6% Underground HVAC, 3.4% Geothermal, 6% Radiant Ceiling Panels, 5.6% Conventional HVAC, 1.4% Total Mechanical Cost: $1,693,025

  43. Life-Cycle Costing Modeled using eQUEST Energy Simulation Tool Basic Gas Costs $13,310/year Basic Electrical Costs $42,633/year

  44. Life-Cycle Costing: Geothermal

  45. Justification • Innovative Design • Comfortable User Space • Complements Surroundings • Life-cycle Payback • Government Funding • Conservatively Estimated

  46. Scheduling Begin Site Mobilization: September 30th, 2015

  47. Schedule Highlights Install Main Mechanical Equip: December 15, 2015 Install Elevator: February 23, 2016 Early Move-In: May 3rd, 2016 Project Completion: September 22, 2016

  48. 4D Model

  49. Spring - When can we meet? Solution: Shorter frequent meetings M – Administrative W – Problem solving F – Accessible hours

  50. Process Improvements Wednesday/Friday meetings Use classroom time for problem solving Mentor meetings Fishbowl Utilize mentors Create a detailed schedule and stick with it Calendars and agendas galore Increase in daily interaction on ThinkTank and email Work together on tasks

More Related