1 / 9

The Genesis of the Dispute Resolution Adviser System

Dispute Prevention The Dispute Resolution Adviser (DRA) System Colin J Wall Global Mediation Services Ltd Prague June 2013. The Genesis of the Dispute Resolution Adviser System. General research work in the USA in late 1990 Concept of the DRA born

stephanie-ellison
Télécharger la présentation

The Genesis of the Dispute Resolution Adviser System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dispute PreventionThe Dispute Resolution Adviser (DRA) SystemColin J WallGlobal Mediation Services Ltd Prague June 2013

  2. The Genesis of the Dispute Resolution Adviser System • General research work in the USA in late 1990 • Concept of the DRA born • First proposed to the Hong Kong Housing Authority in March 1991 • Drawn from 8 different dispute prevention and resolution concepts

  3. The Genesis of the DRA System

  4. Sources – theoretical and actual • Based on two theoretical models of the “Independent Intervenor” and “Dispute Adviser” developed in UK • Combined with elements of Dispute Boards, Project Arbitration, informal partnering, step negotiation & mini-trial all developed in the USA and for pre-contract dispute avoidance and a sensible allocation of risk

  5. How the DRA System Works • Not a one person Dispute Board – more akin to a project mediator or an informal partnering facilitator but a tiered system of techniques • The DRA anticipates problems and brings them to the fore, so they can be discussed and dealt with then and there by the parties • Disagreements are resolved before they become full blown disputes • DRA is a “friend” of the project

  6. How the DRA System Works • Disputes are not evaluated by the DRA as is the case of a Dispute Board, as the DRA serves for the life of the contract and should not only be neutral but seen to be so • The DRA works with the parties – especially the site level representatives and helps them to sort out their own problems before they escalate into disputes • Eventually the parties realize that they are able to work together and the DRA’s interventions diminish – however, as a back up ……

  7. The Adviser role • If there really is a need for an evaluation of some description – then the “Adviser” role comes into play. What is needed to resolve the particular dispute? • Evaluative mediation • Expert opinion • Early Neutral Evaluation • Adjudication and • Ultimately Short-Form Arbitration

  8. Expectations of the DRA System • Reduced tender price • Improved cash flow • Avoidance of long and costly arbitrations • Close budgetary control • Active sub-contractor participation at all stages of the DRA process • Early resolution of disputes by non binding means • All expectations were achieved

  9. Conclusion As at December 2010 DRAs have been used on about 140 building and housing projects and as at July 2011 36 civil engineering projects There has only ever been one dispute which has gone to short-form arbitration on the full DRA system and, so far, no disputes on civil engineering projects using the modified DRA system That is a 99.4% success rate in avoiding disputes!

More Related