190 likes | 295 Vues
Artifact 12 A PowerPoint on Understanding by Design. This artifact was developed during my graduate class School Curriculum: Elementary EDE 6205 Fall 2006.
E N D
Artifact 12A PowerPoint on Understanding by Design. • This artifact was developed during my graduate class School Curriculum: Elementary EDE 6205 Fall 2006. • My role in producing this project was as a member of a group. I was responsible for gathering research and contributing to the research base. In addition, I developed this PowerPoint presentation for the group. • 100 A with positive feedback. • This project addresses the following Florida Educational Leadership Standards: • Standard 2: Instructional Leadership - The principal promotes a positive learning culture, provides an effective instructional program and applies best practices to student learning, especially in the area of reading and other foundational skills. • Reflection: I learned a great deal about developing curriculum that is meaningful to student learning. Charlotte County utilizes Understanding by Design so I was familiar with it. I developed a deeper understanding for this curriculum model through this project.
Understanding by Design An Elementary Curriculum Bo Arthur, Adrienne McElroy, Carole Robbins, Lauren Shamus
Philosophy and Aims of the School • Through the implementation of the new science curriculum student learning will be maximized
Curriculum Goals • All grades will integrate science into the content areas • Providing a rich science curriculum to all grades will develop scientific thinkers for our world
Measurable Outcomes • Year 1: 50% of our students will be on or above grade level on the state assessment instrument • Year 2: the bottom quartile will show 1 year’s growth on the state assessment instrument • Year 3: 70% of our students will be on or above grade level
A Description of the Process Used to Develop This Curriculum • Currently, Good Elementary School follows the district’s written curriculum • Our school uses traditional instructional methods such as direct instruction • Teachers use the basal as their main curriculum guide and start at chapter one and move through the chapters in sequential order
There is limited collaborative planning among teachers • Traditional paper pencil assessments are used that focus on lower level thinking skills • Teachers use assessments provided with text • Teachers do not have consistent expectations of student performance
Review of Best Practice • Classroom Instruction that Works by: Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock • Identify similarities and differences • Summarize and note take • Reinforce effort and provide recognition • Provide opportunities for practice through homework • Nonlinguistic representation • Cooperative Learning • Setting objectives and providing feedback • Generating and testing hypotheses • Cues, questions, and advance organizers
Social Forces • Constant change of social forces demands curricular change • Implementation of new high-stakes tests requires immediate change
Good Elementary school’s population is predominantly white, upper-middle class, with two parent households • Parents have high expectations for their children to succeed on this new state test • The microelectronics revolution mandates the use of technology in the science classroom to enable students to participate in online activities and research • Providing all students regardless of disability with an equal opportunity for adequate education options
Human Development Theory • Intellectual development and achievement • Emotional growth and development • Cultural and social development • Child-centered approach
Review of Test Data • Good Elementary’s test scores in year one were deemed unsatisfactory • Only 30% of all students were proficient
Projected Budget Total Budget: $10,570
Timeline • July- Three day curriculum workshop • August- UBD distribution and mandatory in-service • Program planners will attend weekly meetings with CRT • Weekly collaborative planning grade level meetings
Implementation • Teachers will be required to post UBDs in their classrooms for process monitoring purposes • Weekly administrative walk-throughs • Professional learning communities will be formed to discuss the new curriculum • Plan books will be monitored ensure use of essential questions • Learning experiences that promote understanding and mastery of enduring understandings
Evaluation • Stufflebeam’s context, input, process, product (CIPP) model will be used to evaluate curriculum • Surveys will be distributed to faculty to assess the success of the program • Context • Assesses environment of the school • Assesses student comfort with program • Has student achievement increased • Teacher attitude towards new curriculum
Input • Discussions will take place to decide whether or not the new model is meeting the overall goals of the school • Process • Administrators will check for compliance with newly implemented requirements • District administrators will also have an active role throughout the process to ensure proper implementation is taking place
Product • Determine if first year objective has been met • Decide on whether modifications need to be made for year two implementation
UBD Examples • Enduring understandings • Essential questions