1 / 37

Giving feedback

Giving feedback. Tools of the Trade 21 st November University of Leicester Dr Adrian Hastings and Dr Rhona Knight. Why bother with feedback? What is feedback? Key features of feedback General principles of feedback Types Guidelines A feedback toolbox Useful pre and post course reading.

stew
Télécharger la présentation

Giving feedback

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. www.medev.ac.uk

  2. Giving feedback Tools of the Trade 21st November University of Leicester Dr Adrian Hastings and Dr Rhona Knight www.medev.ac.uk

  3. Why bother with feedback? What is feedback? Key features of feedback General principles of feedback Types Guidelines A feedback toolbox Useful pre and post course reading What is in the handout? www.medev.ac.uk

  4. Why bother with feedback? www.medev.ac.uk

  5. Why bother? • ‘Feedback, or knowledge of results, is the lifeblood of learning.’ • Rowntree D (1982) Educational Technology in Curriculum Development (2e). Paul Chapman Publishing, London. • ‘Feedback is an essential component of education and adult learning.’ • Branch WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002:77, 1185-8. www.medev.ac.uk

  6. Why bother? • It works: • improves learning outcomes • better marks in assessments • better results in other learning situations • deepens approach to learning • encourages active pursuit of understanding and application of knowledge • Black P and William D (1998) Assessment and classroom teaching. Assessment in education 5:7-73. • Rolfe I and McPherson J (1995) Formative assessment: How am I doing? Lancet 385:837-9. www.medev.ac.uk

  7. What is it? www.medev.ac.uk

  8. What is it? • ‘A two-way process in which an educational supervisor or group appropriately share with the learner information based on observation, with the aim of reaching a defined goal.’ • Knight R. The Good Consultation Guide for Nurses, Radcliffe 2006. www.medev.ac.uk

  9. Key features of feedback www.medev.ac.uk

  10. Key features? Support Challenge www.medev.ac.uk

  11. General principles of feedback www.medev.ac.uk

  12. Types of feedback • Brief feedback • Formal feedback • Major feedback www.medev.ac.uk

  13. Timing Environment Appropriate Manageable TEAM Guidelines TEAM www.medev.ac.uk

  14. A feedback toolbox www.medev.ac.uk

  15. A selection of tools • Tool 1: Pendleton’s ‘Rules’ • Tool 2: Calgary - Cambridge • Tool 3: Non-judgemental feedback • Tool 4: Observation versus deduction • Tool 5: Pi • Tool 6: PEE • Tool 7: Unacceptable behaviour www.medev.ac.uk

  16. 1. Pendelton’s ‘rules’ www.medev.ac.uk

  17. Pendleton’s ‘Rules’(Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The New Consultation. Oxford University, 2004.) • The learner goes first and performs the activity • Questions then allowed only on points of clarification of fact • The learner then says what they thought was done well • The teacher then says what they thought was done well • The learner then says what was not done so well, and could be improved upon • The teacher then says what was not done so well and suggests ways for improvements, with discussion in a helpful and constructive manner www.medev.ac.uk

  18. 2. ‘Calgary – Cambridge’ www.medev.ac.uk

  19. SET-GO (Silverman et al.) • What I Saw • What Else did you see? • What does the learner Think? • What Goal are we trying to achieve? • Any Offers on how we should get there? SET GO www.medev.ac.uk

  20. ALOBA(Silverman et al.) • Agenda • Led • Outcome • Based • Analysis ALOBA www.medev.ac.uk

  21. 3. Non-judgemental feedback www.medev.ac.uk

  22. Non-judgemental feedback • Based on description • ‘Communication skills are neither intrinsically good nor bad, they are just helpful, or not helpful, in achieving a particular objective in a given situation’ • Silverman et al www.medev.ac.uk

  23. Evaluative/judgemental The beginning was awful, you just seemed to ignore her. The beginning was excellent - great stuff!! Descriptive At the beginning you were looking at the notes, which prevented eye contact. At the beginning you gave her your full attention and never lost eye contact – your facial expression registered your interest in what she was saying. What is it? www.medev.ac.uk

  24. 4. Observation vs deduction www.medev.ac.uk

  25. Observation versus deduction • Separate behaviour and interpretation • Make interpretations tentative • I noticed at this stage that you moved more in your seat, and your face became red, I wondered if you might be embarrassed? www.medev.ac.uk

  26. 5. Pi () – Point / Illustration www.medev.ac.uk

  27. Pi () – Point / Illustration • Make sure that the student knows what you’re talking about! • As well as a label, give an example Point Illustration www.medev.ac.uk

  28. 6. PEE – point / explanation / example www.medev.ac.uk

  29. PEE – point / explanation / example • Make sure that the student knows what you’re talking about! • As well as a label, give a reason and an example Point Explanation Example www.medev.ac.uk

  30. 7. Unacceptable behaviour www.medev.ac.uk

  31. 7. Unacceptable behaviour(West Midlands modular trainers’ course, 2003) • 1. Check person is OK before you start • 2. Use a wake-up, warning phrase: “There’s something very serious I have to say” • 3. Say, very simply, what is not right • 4. Give an example as appropriate • 5. Relax the tone to allow for a positive response • usually an offer to improve ensues • 6. Respond to offer positively • but define specific, measurable outcomes • 7. Do not be drawn into discussion on • justification of behaviour • your right to judge • 8. Most of us take criticism better if it is not personal. • “Maybe what I did was not good – but it doesn’t mean I’m no good.” • Make sure that the student can see this distinction too www.medev.ac.uk

  32. Summary www.medev.ac.uk

  33. Good feedback is • Suited to purpose • Specific • Directed towards behaviour rather than personality • Checked with the recipient • Problem solving • A suggestion rather than prescriptive www.medev.ac.uk

  34. Timing Environment Appropriate Manageable TEAM Guidelines TEAM www.medev.ac.uk

  35. Useful further reading: • Teaching made easy • Chambers and Wall • Radcliffe 2000 • ISBN: 1-85775-373-9 • Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine • Kurtz, Silverman and Draper • Radcliffe 1998 • ISBN: 1-85775-272-2 • Adult and continuing education • Jarvis • Routledge 1995 • ISBN: 0-415-10242-1 • The Good Consultation Guide for Nurses • Hastings and Redsell (eds) • Radcliffe 2006 • ISBN: 1-85775-688-6 www.medev.ac.uk

  36. Useful pre-course reading • Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983:250,777-81 • http://www.utmb.edu/surgery/clerks/feedback.htm • Silverman J, Draper J, Kurtz SM. The Calgary – Cambridge approach to communications skills teaching 1: Agenda led outcome based analysis of the consultation. Educ Gen Prac.1996; 7, 288-99 • Silverman J, Draper J, Kurtz SM. The Calgary –Cambridge approach to communications skills teaching 2: SET-GO method of descriptive feedback. Educ Gen Prac.1996; 8, 16-23 www.medev.ac.uk

  37. www.medev.ac.uk

More Related