1 / 17

Thomas L. Vollrath Economic Research Service USDA

suchin
Télécharger la présentation

Thomas L. Vollrath Economic Research Service USDA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Changing Agricultural Trade Patterns in North AmericaChanging Agricultural Trade Patterns in North AmericaAAEA-CAES WorkshopNorth American Free Trade Agreements: Policy Challenges for 2002 Farm Bill and BeyondSession I, August 8, 2001The Impacts of NAFTA and CUSTA on Agricultural Trade Flows Thomas L. Vollrath Economic Research Service USDA

  2. Chart 1: Intra-NAFTA agricultural trade grew faster than NAFTA trade with the rest of the world NAFTA CUSTA

  3. Total agriculture(USDA-defined) and the 4 subsectors • Bulk commodities • unmilled grain, oilseeds, raw fiber • Processed intermediates • flour, feed, vegetable oils, spun fiber, live animals • Fresh produce & horticultural products • fruits, vegetables, nuts, flower, horticultural products • High-value-processed products • fresh & frozen meats, pasta, breakfast cereals, wine, beer, food preparations

  4. Chart 2:The dominance of bulk exports has declined considerably since 1974-76

  5. Chart 3: Mexico now exports more fresh produce and horticultural products than bulk commodities

  6. Chart 4: U.S. processed food exports to Canada and Mexico & U.S. FDI in food manufacturing move in tandem CUSTA NAFTA

  7. Chart 5: The U.S. is a more important market to Canada and Mexico than either of these countries are to the United States NAFTA CUSTA CUA

  8. Chart 6: The U.S. captures a much larger share of the Mexican market than exporters in Mexico secure in the U.S. NAFTA

  9. Chart 7: The U.S. also captures a much larger share of the Canadian market than exporters in Canada achieve in the U.S. CUSTA

  10. Chart 8: U.S. agricultural exports to Canada (Mexico) were 3.6 (6.3) times greater than would have been predicted in the absence of special inducements and impediments CUSTA NAFTA

  11. Chart 9: The farm economies in all three NAFTA have undergone substantial structural change NAFTA CUSTA

  12. Chart 10: NAFTA countries have developed or strengthened comparative advantages in HVPP post-CUSTA/NAFTA CUSTA NAFTA

  13. Chart 11: The United States is a big winner exporting meats across the board NAFTA CUSTA

  14. Field crops and high-value products • Field crops • rice, wheat, corn, and other cereals • soybeans, rapeseed, and other oilseeds • cotton and other plant fiber • fresh fruits, vegetables, and nuts • legumes and tubers • other crops • High-value products (HVP) • pasta, bakery products, and breakfast cereals • meat and meat products • processed fruits and vegetables • beer, wine, soft drinks, distilled alcoholic beverages • other food preparations

  15. Chart 12: Pre-NAFTA downward trends in U.S.-to-Mexico complementarities reversed themselves during 1994-98 NAFA NAFTA NAFTA

  16. Chart 13: Increased complementarities characterize U.S.-Canadian trade post-CUSTA CUSTA CUSTA

  17. Summary of key findings • Explosive growth in intra-NAFTA trade • Changes in the composition of ag trade • Changes in the geographical distribution of member-country trade • Increased competitiveness within NAFTA • “Neighborly” trade more important most everywhere, except for Mexican exporters • Some evidence that structural changes are beneficial

More Related