1 / 25

Subtropical Mode Water: the result of air-sea interaction?

Sources and Predictability of Anomalies in North Atlantic Subtropical Mode Water Formation Using the Walin Framework ( A CLIMODE contribution) Kathryn A. Kelly University of Washington Western Boundary Current Air-sea Interaction Working Group Workshop January 2009.

summer
Télécharger la présentation

Subtropical Mode Water: the result of air-sea interaction?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sources and Predictability of Anomalies in North Atlantic Subtropical Mode Water Formation Using the Walin Framework(A CLIMODE contribution)Kathryn A. KellyUniversity of WashingtonWestern Boundary Current Air-sea Interaction Working Group Workshop January 2009

  2. Subtropical Mode Water:the result of air-sea interaction? STMW: thick isothermal layer (18C “EDW”), south of Gulf Stream Conventional wisdom (Worthington, 1976): STMW is formed by heat losses from cold air outbreaks over the warm Gulf Stream

  3. Subtropical Mode Water:What does it contribute to air-sea interaction? WBC advection brings warm water into region Heat is stored south of WBC (recirculation gyre) Accumulated heat is fluxed to atmosphere Large heat storage <=> Low STMW volume Shenfu Dong, Ph D thesis, 2004

  4. Heat Content and Mode Water in the Gulf Stream Region Low heat content <=> thick 18C layer Subtropical Mode Water <=> heat deficit 50-year correlation in GS (Kwon thesis) Low heat content <=> low SSH

  5. Heat Content and Air-Sea Heat Fluxin Gulf Stream Sea Surface Height (proxy for heat content) and turbulent flux: SSH leads by 3 months in STMW region => Heat storage forces heat loss (seasonal-interannual)

  6. The Walin Framework for Mode Water CLIMODE: understanding mode water formation & dispersion Volume flux is a function of air-sea fluxes B and diffusion D (focus here only on formation)

  7. Transformation and Formation(using temperature, not density) Transformation F - add water to a temperature class Formation M - difference between water entering & waterleaving Outcrop area A - area of a given temperature interval at sea surface (NOT Walin volume flux) Net surface heat flux Q

  8. Causes and Predictability of Formation Examineanomalies over many years to answer: • Does formation depend more on “cold air outbreaks” (Q) or on pre-existing ocean conditions (stratification, A)? • How predictable is formation rate M?

  9. 2004 2007 Stratification, SST and Outcrop Area • Below mixed layer water is 18C • Higher stratification gives SST>18C (warmer) • Low stratification => larger 18C outcrop

  10. Formation Estimates • Integrate net surface heat flux over SST outcrop • Problem: flux resolution is low (prior to 2002) • Solution: EOF decomposition (and CCA) to match resolution

  11. Turbulent Heat Flux Example High-resolution: QuikSCAT/AMSR /ECMWF Low-resolution: NCEP2 variables run through COARE Reconstructed flux using ~24 CCA modes

  12. SST Example “Match” resolution of SST to flux fields Degrade SST: only ~24 CCA modes

  13. Wintertime (JFM) Fluxes

  14. Annual Formation Rates: 1990-2007(only in western Atlantic) Most formation occurs in JFM (red vs black) Sensitive to outcrop (blue vs black) Use 17.5-18.5C And JFM mean

  15. Interannual Variations Q Interannual variations in heat loss much smaller than outcrop size (Possibly from poor Q estimates) A M

  16. How Does Formation M Depend on Q and A? (17.5-18.5C outcrop heat loss & outcrop area) Outcrop area more important than Qnet!

  17. Regression of 18C formation M on Q and A(18C JFM anomalies) • M depends only on outcrop area: 58% variance reduction from A alone Q contribution not significant (F test) • Q and A anti-correlated:  = -0.38, large A (colder) gives less heat loss (A contains information about Q, no additional information from uncorrelated part of Q)

  18. Preconditioning: December SST

  19. Preconditioning: can December observations predict JFM formation M? 19.5C outcrop heat loss & outcrop area December heat loss has more skill than outcrop area Both make significant contributions to prediction

  20. Causes and Prediction of Interannual Variations in Mode Water Formation Conclusions: • STMW is a heat (deficit) reservoir for air-sea interaction • STMW formation depends more on outcrop area (ocean stratification) than on heat loss (e.g., cold air outbreaks) • Heat loss is correlated with outcrop area (and with heat content): STMW <=> memory in climate system • December heat loss and outcrop area can predict JFM formation anomalies <=> some predictability

  21. Unresolved Issues in Mode Water Limitations of this study: • Dispersion of STMW was not considered (volume depends on formation minus dispersion) • Short record: only 17 years (extend!) Future work: • Are formation estimates consistent with volume changes? • Does this analysis apply to the North Pacific STMW?

  22. Wintertime (JFM) SST

  23. Which outcrop best describes SST? Outcrops anticorrelated with SST: December 20C and March 18C

  24. Can December outcrop area A predict JFM heat loss Q? • Dec. 19.5C outcrop area A has predictive skill for JFM heat loss, Q

More Related