1 / 65

Evolution of CARTS: Past, Present & Future

This presentation by Alain L. Kornhauser at the ITS-NJ Annual Meeting discusses the evolution of Center for Automated Road Transportation Safety (CARTS) from Automated Highway Systems to Automated Vehicles. It highlights the potential of autonomous vehicles to improve safety and reduce costs, particularly in the transit industry.

Télécharger la présentation

Evolution of CARTS: Past, Present & Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolution of Center for Automated Road Transportation Safety (CARTS) Past, Present & Future by Alain L. Kornhauser, PhDProfessor, Operations Research & Financial EngineeringDirector, Program in Transportation Faculty Chair, PAVE (Princeton Autonomous Vehicle Engineering) Princeton University Presented at ITS-NJ Annual Meeting October 30, 2015 Rutgers University

  2. Past • There seems to be a new Transportation Technology realization… What started out in “1939” as Automated Highways

  3. AHS: Automated Highway Systems: 1939 - 1997 “Waterloo”: No feasible way to get started

  4. V2V: Connected Vehicles: 1997 - “Waterloo”: Little value until a substantial market penetration is achieved. Again a non-starter

  5. Automated Vehicles (rather than Automated Highways) : 2004 - Focus on making one Automated Vehicle co-exist with today’s infrastructure and human drivers; then simply replicate Real beauty is in its “autonomy” (forgo the “Systems” concept) : Each replicated vehicle benefits (Cost of Replication is Small) ! CityMobil2

  6. NHTSA: Car Crashes cost US $871B/yr(~ $2,800/person 5/29/14) • The Sensors, Actuators and Algorithms are on the verge of being able to • Drive as well as the best of us • without needing any infrastructure improvements • in enough places • at enough times • to make a substantial difference in Safety. Present: Safety is an Issue!

  7. But you say… • Alain… Safety doesn’t Sell! Look… • Few drive Volvos, • Public-sector Mandates and Threatens : Up until now we have focused on crash mitigation (This saves lives  , but hasn’t reduced costs  )

  8. NHTSA: Car Crashes cost US $871B/yr(~ $2,800/person 5/29/14) • Buses: • The Sensors, Actuators and Algorithms are on the verge of being able to • Drive as well as the best of us • without needing any infrastructure improvements • in enough places • at enough times • to make a substantial difference in Safety. Present: Safety is an Issue!

  9. http://orfe.princeton.edu/~alaink/SmartDrivingCars/Videos/Subaru%20EyeSight_Commercial60secCrashTest.mp4http://orfe.princeton.edu/~alaink/SmartDrivingCars/Videos/Subaru%20EyeSight_Commercial60secCrashTest.mp4 More Viable Future:

  10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yARbNYcjPQM More Viable Future:

  11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWj44GjrSs0 More Viable Future:

  12. More Viable Future: For Example • Driving a Bus is NOT Simple and Very Stressful • Requires Continuous Diligence • 2 bus drivers in NYC arrested for striking a pedestrian while simply trying to do their job • Driving is one of the most dangerous occupation

  13. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance The Political Case • Driving a Bus is NOT Simple and Very Stressful • Requires Continuous Diligence • 2 bus drivers in NYC arrested for striking a pedestrian while simply trying to do their job • Driving is one of the most dangerous occupation • Drivers need help and ACA systems are available to help! • Transit Unions & OSHA need to be demanding deployment of ACAS on all buses!

  14. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance The Business Case Bus Collisions are Expensive!

  15. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance The Business Case The Trend is NOT Good!

  16. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance The Business Case

  17. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance In the next five days the bus transit industry will spend $6.8 million in casualty and liability expenses The Business Case Bus Collisions are Expensive!

  18. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance The Business Case Bus Collisions are Expensive! Fundamental Business Model We are near a point where: Cost of Automated Collision Avoidance Technology < Present Value {Expected Liability Savings over life of bus}

  19. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance The Business Case Bus Collisions are Expensive!

  20. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance The Business Case Bus Collisions are Expensive!

  21. Near-Term Transit Opportunity: Automated Collision Avoidance Plus:Lives Saved,Injuries Avoided, Disruptions Averted, and Arrests not MadeAll for Free!!! The Business Case Bus Collisions are Expensive!

  22. Evolve the Sensors, Actuators and Algorithms to • be Cheaper & Drive Better than the best of us • without needing any infrastructure improvements • in More places • at More times • While continuing to improve Safety, AND • Revolutionize Mobility for All • Substantially Reduce • Energy Consumption • Pollution, and • Green House Gases (GHG) Future Fundamentally Strong Business Case!

  23. Fundamentally Strong Business Case! But, an Enormous Amount of Work Needs to be Done

  24. Over the Past 3 Years A Number of US have been Meeting: • To Leverage the Region’s Assets: • Home of major NA HQ: Insurance, Auto OEM, Technology, Communications and University Research • Re-purposing of PU’s Forrestal Campus, Fort Monmouth & Bell Labs • To Create the Research, Certification & Commercialization Environment: That Develops SmartDrivingTechnology (SDT) such that: PriceSDT<NetPresentValue{ Expected{AccidentLiabilityw/o SDT } - Expected {AccidentLiabilityw SDT }} • To Create Jobs while Improving Safety, Mobility and the Environment

  25. Over the Past 3 Years We’ve created : • Center for Automated Road Transportation Safety (CARTS) • Initial Board of Governance: • Initial Focus on Automated Collision Avoidance • A Scope that includes • Research • Certification & • Commercialization • That Spans all Road modes: • Cars • Buses • Trucks • And Recognizes the Importance of After-market as well as OEM

  26. CARTS Focus: Automated Collision Avoidance CARTS Activity Matrix Trucks Modal Dimension Transit Cars Research Certification Commercialization Sector Dimension

  27. CARTS Focus: Automated Collision Avoidance Center’s Activity Tensor Trucks After-market/Retrofit Modal Dimension Transit OEM Cars Research Certification Commercialization Sector Dimension

  28. CARTS Focus: Automated Collision Avoidance Center’s Activity Tensor Research Certification Trucks Commercialization Trucks Transit Transit Modal Dimension After-Market/Retrofit Cars After-Market/Retrofit OEM Cars OEM Research Certification Commercialization Sector Dimension

  29. Next Steps • Launch the CARTS Research Activities @ PU’s Forrestal Campus, • Prepare for the CARTS Certification Activities @ Fort Monmouth, and • Prepare for the CARTS Commercialization Activities @ Bell Works

  30. Discussion! Thank You alaink@princeton.edu www.SmartDrivingCar.com

  31. Just a Note:

  32. Just a Note: • Application of Existing Automated Lane Keeping & Intelligent Cruise Control • (What exists today in Mercedes, Volvo & Tesla) • To the 3,000 buses that currently use the XBL today • 3,000 x $5,000 = $15M (0.15% of $10B) • Could increase the capacity of the XBL by 50% • From 700 to 1,050 buses/hr (adding 17,500 commuters/hr = added capacity of new rail tunnel) • But ONLY if the $10B spent on the new terminal is designed to accommodate this 50% increase in throughput.

  33. Discussion! Thank You alaink@princeton.edu www.SmartDrivingCar.com

  34. The following slides will NOT be used

  35. Princeton University Center for Research, Certification & Commercialization of Automated Vehicles at Fort Monmouth McAfee Complex 1250’ x 865’ ~ 25.8 acres Vehicle Bays McAfee Office Building ~ 100,000sf Support Buildings

  36. Center for Automated Road Transportation Safety McAfee Complex 1250’ x 865’ ~ 25.8 acres Vehicle Bays McAfee Office Building ~ 100,000sf Support Buildings

  37. Princeton University Center for Research, Certification & Commercialization of Automated Vehicles at Fort Monmouth Secure Test Center ~ 80 acres

  38. Princeton University Center for Research, Certification & Commercialization of Automated Vehicles at Fort Monmouth Mixed Use of Roadways in ½ the Fort ~ 1 sq. mile Exclusive Use Roadways

  39. APM: Automated People Mover: 1968 - “Waterloo” limited to serve “Few to Few” demand

  40. PRT: Personal Rapid Transit: 1968 - Attempt to serve “Many to Many” but “Waterloo” may well be the word “Personal” & Exclusive Guideway?

  41. Quality of Life 101: Important Elements • Environment • Clean air, water, … • Employment • “High Quality” Jobs • Correlated with Crime/Personal Safety • Mobility • Personal Desire with Societal Oversight Priorities: Safety, Efficiency, Equity, Comfort, Convenience, …

  42. Founding Premise • Automated Vehicle Technology can evolve such that: • If added to a single vehicle, • The probabilities that this vehicle will be involved in various types of accidents are substantially reduced. Overall the expected Liability Cost Savings ($L) attributed to those avoided accidents > Installed Cost ($C) of that Technology

More Related