1 / 27

Crawlers

Padmini Srinivasan Computer Science Department Department of Management Sciences http:// cs.uiowa.edu / ~ psriniva padmini-srinivasan@uiowa.edu. Crawlers. Basics. What is a crawler? HTTP client software that sends out an HTTP request for a page and reads a resppnse . Timeouts

suzy
Télécharger la présentation

Crawlers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Padmini Srinivasan Computer Science Department Department of Management Sciences http://cs.uiowa.edu/~psriniva padmini-srinivasan@uiowa.edu Crawlers

  2. Basics • What is a crawler? • HTTP client software that sends out an HTTP request for a page and reads a resppnse. • Timeouts • How much to download? • Exception handling • Error handling • Collect statistics: time-outs, etc. • Follows Robot Exclusion Protocol (de facto, 1994 onwards)

  3. Tippie web site • # robots.txt for http://www.tippie.uiowa.edu/ or http://tippie.uiowa.edu/ • # Rules for all robots accessing the site. • User-agent: * • Disallow: /error-pages/ • Disallow: /includes/ • Disallow: /Redirects/ • Disallow: /scripts/ • Disallow: /CFIDE/ • # Individual folders that should not be indexed • Disallow: /vaughan/Board/ • Disallow: /economics/mwieg/ • Disallow: /economics/midwesttheory/ • Disallow: /undergraduate/scholars/ • Sitemap: http://tippie.uiowa.edu/sitemap.xml

  4. Robots.txt User-agent: * Disallow: User-agent: BadBot Disallow: / User-agent: Google Disallow: User-agent: * Disallow: / <html> <head> <meta name="googlebot" content="noindex"> http://www.robotstxt.org/ Legal? No. But has been used in legal cases.

  5. Types of crawlers • Get everything? • Broad….. • Get everything within on a topic? • Preferential, topical, focused, thematic • What are your objectives behind the crawl? • Keep it fresh • When does one run it? Get new versus check old? • How does one evaluate performance? • Sometimes? Continuously? What’s the Gold Standard?

  6. Design

  7. Crawler Parts • Frontier • List of “to be visited” URLS • FIFO (first in first out) • Priority queue (preferential) • When the Frontier is full • Does this happen? What to do? • When the Frontier is empty • Does this happen? • 10,000 pages crawled, average 7 links / page: 60,000 URLS in the frontier, how so? • Unique URLS?

  8. Crawler Parts • History • Time-stamped listing of visited URLS – take out of frontier first • Can keep other information too: quality estimate, update frequency, rate of errors (in accessing page), last update date, anything you want to track related to the fetching of the page. • Fast lookup • Hashing scheme on the URL itself • Canonicalize: • Lowercasing; • remove anchor reference parts: • http://www……./faq.html#time • http://www……./faq.html • Remove tildas • Add or subtract trailing / • Remove default pages: index.html • Normalize paths: removing parent pointers in url • http://www…./data/../mydata.html • Normalize port numbers: default numbers (80) • Spider traps: long URLS, limit length.

  9. Crawler Parts • Page Repository • Keep all of it? Some of it? Just the anchor texts? • You decide • Parse the web page • Index and store information (if creating a search engine of some kind) • What to index? How to index? How to store? • Stopwords, stemming, phrases, Tag tree evidence (DOM), • NOISE! • Extract URLS • Google initially: show you next time.

  10. And… • But why do crawlers actually work? • Topical locality hypothesis • An on topic page tends to link to other on topic pages. • Empirical test : that two pages that are topically similar have higher probability of linking to each other than two random pages on the web. (Davison, 2000) • And too browsing works! • Status locality? • high status web pages are more likely to link to other high status pages than to low status pages • Rationale from social theories: relationship asymmetry in social groups and the spontaneous development of social hierarchies.

  11. Crawler Algorithms • Naïve best-first crawler • Best-N-first crawler • SharkSearch crawler • FishSearch • Focused crawler • Context Focused crawler • InfoSpiders • Utility-biased web crawlers

  12. Naïve Best First Crawler • Compute cosine between page and query/description as URL score • Term frequency (TF) and Inverse Document Frequency (IDF) weights • Multi-threaded: Best-N-crawler (256)

  13. Naïve best-first crawler • Bayesian classifier to score URLS Chakrabartiet al. 1999 • SVM (Pant and Srinivasan, 2005) better. Naïve Bayes tends to produce skewed scores. • Use PageRank to score URLS? • How to compute? Partial data. Based on crawled data – poor results • Later: utility-biased crawler

  14. Shark Search Crawler • From earlier Fish Search (de Bra et al.) • Depth bound; anchor text; link context; inherited scores score(u) = g * inherited(u) + (1 – g) * neighbourhood (u) inherited(u) = x * sim(p, q) if sim(p, q) > 0 else inherited(p) (x < 1). neighbourhood(u) = b * anchor(u) + (1-b) * context(u) (b < 1) context(u) = 1 if anchor(u) > 0 else sim(aug_context, q) Depth: controls travel in a sub space; no more ‘relevant’ information found.

  15. Focused Crawler • Chakrabarti et al. Stanford/IIT • Topic taxonomy • User provided sample URLs • Classify these onto the taxonomy • (Prob(c|url) where Prob(root|url) = 1. • User iterates selecting and deselecting categories • Mark the ‘good’ categories • When page crawled: relevance(page) = sum(Prob(c|page)) where sum is over the good categories; score URLS • When crawling: • Soft mode: use this relevance score to rank URLS • Hard mode: find leaf node with highest score, if any ancestor marked relevant then add to frontier else not

  16. Context Focused Crawler • A rather different strategy • Topic locality hypothesis somewhat explicitly used here • Classifiers estimate distance to relevant page from a crawled page. This estimate scores urls.

  17. Context Graph

  18. Context Graph Levels: L Probability (page in class, i.e., level x) x = 1, 2, 3 (other) Bayes theorem: Prob(L1|page) = {Prob(page|L1) * Prob(L1)}/Prob(page) Prob(L1) = 1/L (number of levels)

  19. Utility-Biased Crawler • Considers both topical and status locality. • Estimates status via local properties • Combines using several functions. • One: Cobb-Douglas function • Utility(URL) = topicalitya * statusb (a + b = 1) • if a page is twice as high in topicality and twice as high in status then twice as high utility as well. • Increases in topicality (or status) cause smaller increases in utility as the topicality (or status) increases.

  20. Estimating Status ~ cool part • Local properties • M5’ decision tree algorithm • Information volume • Information location • http://www.somedomain.com/products/news/daily.html • Information specificity • Information brokerage • Link ratio: # links/ # words • Quantitative ratio: # numbers/# words • Domain traffic: ‘reach’ data for domain obtained from Alexa Web Information Service • Pant & Srinivasan, 2010, ISR

  21. Utility-Biased Crawler • Cobb-Douglas function • Utility(URL) = topicalitya * statusb (a + b = 1) • Should a be fixed? “one size fits all” Or should it vary based on the subspace? • Target topicality level (d) • a = a + delta (d – t), 0 <= a <= 1 • t: average estimated topicality of the last 25 pages fetched • Delta is a step size (0.01) • Assume a = 0.7, delta = 0.01 and t = 0.9 • a = 0.7 + 0.01(0.7 – 0.9) = 0.7 – 0.002 • Assume a = 0.7, delta = 0.01 and t = 0.4 • a = 0.7 + 0.01(0.7 – 0.4) = 0.7 + 0.003

  22. It’s a matter of balance

  23. Crawler Evaluation • What are good pages? • Web scale is daunting • User based crawls are short, but web agents? • Page importance assessed • Presence of query keywords • Similarity of page to query/description • Similarity to seed pages (held out sample) • Use a classifier – not the same as used in crawler • Link-based popularity (but within topic?)

  24. Summarizing Performance • Precision • Relevance is Boolean: yes/no • Harvest rate: # of good pages/total # pages • Relevance is continuous • Average relevance over crawled set • Recall • Target recall: held out seed pages (H) • |H ∧ pages crawled|/|pages crawled| • Robustness • Start same crawler on disjoint seed sets. Examine overlap of fetched pages

  25. Sample Performance Graph

  26. Summary • Crawler architecture • Crawler algorithms • Crawler evaluation • Assignment 1 • Run two crawlers for 5000 pages. • Start with the same set of seed pages for a topic. • Look at overlap and report this over time (robustness)

More Related