1 / 19

Place-making and place-keeping of open spaces – MP4 Harry Smith – Heriot-Watt University

Edinburgh Knowledge Environment Partnership 21 June 2012. Place-making and place-keeping of open spaces – MP4 Harry Smith – Heriot-Watt University. MP4 Project Aims (2008-2012). Funded by EU – Interreg IVB North Sea Region

sylvia
Télécharger la présentation

Place-making and place-keeping of open spaces – MP4 Harry Smith – Heriot-Watt University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Edinburgh Knowledge Environment Partnership 21 June 2012 Place-making and place-keeping of open spaces – MP4 Harry Smith – Heriot-Watt University

  2. MP4 Project Aims (2008-2012) Funded by EU – Interreg IVB North Sea Region • Demonstrate how positive socio-economic impacts of open space improvements can be maintained in long term • Provide solutions for maintenance & management needs • Mainstream best practice in place-keeping across North Sea Region • Embed place-keeping innovations into policy • Develop shared agenda for long-term open space improvement HafenCity, Hamburg Firth Park, Sheffield Temalekplats playground, Malmö

  3. Place-making • Creation of high-quality places that people want to visit, experience and enjoy • Implies a people-centred approach • Health and wellbeing • Sense of belonging and attachment • Welcoming and inclusive places HafenCity, Hamburg; River Don, Sheffield; Hailes Quarry Park, Edinburgh.

  4. Place-keeping • What happens ‘after’ high quality places have been created • Retaining, maintaining and enhancing the qualities and benefits through LTM • Long-term management of places • to ensure that the social, environmental and economic quality and benefits can be enjoyed by future generations • E.g. trees in park growing to maturity (increased biodiversity/ aesthetic value/ interest) Woesten, West Flanders; Leuven, Flemish Brabant; Manor & Castle, Sheffield.

  5. Place-making and place-keeping • A process leading to a product? • A process influenced by the type of product required? • A two-way relationship between process and product where place-keeping is considered at the beginning?

  6. MP4 Activites • Assessment of current practice • Case studies • Literature review • Demonstration – pilot projects • Assess partnership and agreements • Evaluate process and product • Identify ways to improve, share good practice • Information sharing, influencing • Outputs – knowledge transfer • Changing practice and policy Grassmarket, Edinburgh, Scotland; Bürgerpark, Bremen, Germany; Aarhus, Denmark.

  7. Policy • Widespread area-based policy initiatives are based on place-keeping ideas • Place-keeping often included in policy guidance, but not in statutory legislation • some aspects may be covered by policy (e.g. health+safety) • Rules/ regulations may influence use + behaviour • e.g. through signage • aims to support long-term positive use of and behaviour

  8. Policy Gothenburg Strategic Park Programme 5 strategies for the landscape of Göteborg: • 1. Identify and enhance the characteristics • 2. Make sure that green areas are accessible and within reach • 3. Make sure every place is taken care of (=place keeping) • 4. Make places and spacesavailable for the residents to use • 5. Creatediversifiedenvironments

  9. Governance & engagement • The processes of interaction between public, private, third sector and community partners involved in place-keeping • Government does not work in isolation, but through the above relations with a range of stakeholders • Participatory model of decision-making: • is underpinned by democracy • puts emphasis on consensus

  10. Governance & engagement Shared space in Barger-Compascuum, NL Town Council Residents (Comm. Group) Project team Project group Reflection group (centre group) Communication Design Implementation

  11. Partnerships • Agreed shared responsibility for place-keeping • Partnerships are effective in achieving place-keeping, especially: • a combination of public-private-third sector • where the local community is involved + engaged Emmen, the Netherlands; Steilshoop, Hamburg; Woesten, Belgium.

  12. PartnershipsRipples in the Pond, Firth Park, Sheffield • Joint partnership project between Friends of Firth Park and Parks & Countryside Service • Friends Group – highly involved in consultation, securing funding, design development, tendering • Ownership/Empowerment • Identity – local identity & site history fed into design • Design – innovative and adventurous, bespoke to the site • Sustainability – ongoing maintenance and community use

  13. Funding/ finance • Funding is crucial for place-keeping but limited • ideally in place from the outset/ place-making stage • Funding easier to access for place-making • place-keeping costs often not considered • Tends to come from the public sector • the funding of place-keeping is not statutory • place-keeping is particularly at risk when budgets are cut

  14. Funding/ financeFrom BIDs to NIDs, Hamburg • Business Improvement Districts • Joint financing of public realm improvements via obligatory levy • Additional to public provision • Landowners in Germany; businesses in UK • Neighbourhood (Housing) Improvement Districts • Legislated for in Hamburg in 2007 • Pilot project in Steilshoop

  15. Evaluation • Wide range of existing tools: e.g. awards, competitions, user counts, surveys but… • not a statutory obligation & not carried out regularly • Evaluation often not a priority • it can be costly and time-intensive • but can lead to secure funding for place-keeping (e.g. Green Flag (UK)) • Can everything be measured? • e.g. quality/ aesthetic value…? • increasing attempts to give landscape/ green space a monetary value

  16. EvaluationSociotope mapping, Gothenburg • Lövgärdet and Eriksbo: two deprived 1960s/70s housing estates with under-used adjacent nature areas • Identified high priority areas through sociotope map and park plan

  17. Challenges • Policy: How can we improve the current policy framework for place-keeping? • Governance: What can and should the role of government, business and communities be in the place-keeping of open space? • Partnerships: How can long-lasting partnerships be formed that ensure access to resources and deliver place-keeping that meets the needs of different stakeholders? • Funding/finance:How can the economic benefits of open spaces be harnessed to secure funding of place-keeping? • Evaluation:How can barriers be overcome to ensure more widespread evaluation of open space that contributes to it its long-term management? • Design: How can open space be designed to facilitate long-term management?

  18. http://mp4-interreg.eu Temalekplats playground, Malmö

More Related