1 / 17

Perturbations of Higher-dimensional Spacetimes

Perturbations of Higher-dimensional Spacetimes. Jan Novák. 1. Introduction 2. Stability of the Swarzschild solution 3. Higher-dimensional black holes 4. Gregory-Laflamme instability 5. Gauge-invariant variables and decoupling of perturbations 6. Near-horizon geometry

tacey
Télécharger la présentation

Perturbations of Higher-dimensional Spacetimes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perturbations • of Higher-dimensional Spacetimes Jan Novák

  2. 1. Introduction 2. Stability of the Swarzschild solution 3. Higher-dimensional black holes 4. Gregory-Laflamme instability 5. Gauge-invariant variables and decoupling of perturbations 6. Near-horizon geometry 7. Summary

  3. stable • stable • unstable Cauchy horizon Introduction

  4. Stability of Schwarzschild Solution

  5. Higher-dimensional Black Holes • Physics of event horizons is far richer: ‘black Saturn’, S3 ,S1×S2, … which solutions are stable? • Schwarzschild-Tangherlini solution stable against linearized gravitational PBs for all d > 4[2003 Ishibashi, Kodama] • Stability of Myers-Perry is an open problem

  6. Note: See the author’s page, he compares this photo with G-L instability Photo: VitorCardoso

  7. Gregory-Laflamme Instability • Prototype for situations where the size of the horizon is much larger in some directions than in other • Ultraspinning BH→ arbitrarily large angular momentum in d≧6 • GL instability ⇒ ultraspinning black holes are unstable

  8. Gauge-invariant variables • We use GHP formalism [Pravda et al. 2010] • Quantity X,X = X(0) + X(1), where X(0) is the value in the background ST and X(1) is the PB • Let X be a ST scalar → infinitesimal coordinate transformation with parameters 𝜉𝜇: X(1) +𝜉.𝜕X(0) Hence X(1) is invariant under infinitesimal coordinate transformations, iffX(0) is constant.

  9. In the case of gravitational PB’s → 𝛺ij, since these are higher-dimensional generalization of the 4d quantity 𝛹0 • Lemma: 𝛺(1)ij is a gauge invariant quantity, iff l is a multiple WAND of the background ST • Decoupling of equations ? KUNDT: ∃ l geodesic, such that 𝜃=𝜎=w=0

  10. Near-horizon geometry • Consideranextremeblack hole… where𝜕/𝜕𝜙I , I=1,…,n are the rotational Killing vector fields of the black hole and kIare constants. The coordinates 𝜙I have period 2𝜋. • Thenear-horizon geometry ofanextremeblack hole istheKundtspacetime→ study gravitationalperturbationsusingourperturbedequation

  11. Undercertaincircumstances, instabilityofnear-horizon geometry impliesinstabilityofthefullextremeblack hole !![Reall et al.2002-2010]

  12. Summary Heuristic arguments suggest that Myers-Perry black holes might be unstable for sufficiently large angular momentum. • There exists a gauge-invariant quantity for describing perturbations of algebraically special spacetimes, e.g. Myers-Perry black holes. • This quantity satisfies a decoupled equation only in a Kundtbackground. • This decoupled equation can be used to study gravitational perturbations ofthesocalled near - horizon geometries of extreme blackholes: much easier than studying full black hole, isn’t it ?

  13. Thank you for your attention

More Related