1 / 9

Departmental Survey: Overview of Results 26 Feb 2009

Departmental Survey: Overview of Results 26 Feb 2009. Statistics – Staff that Participated. 93/129 Academic staff 62% 70/202 Research Associates 35% 20/31 Administration 65% 18/40 Technical 45%. Positive Outcomes. Treated with respect?. Good cooperation within groups?.

tadita
Télécharger la présentation

Departmental Survey: Overview of Results 26 Feb 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Departmental Survey: Overview of Results 26 Feb 2009

  2. Statistics – Staff that Participated 93/129 Academic staff 62% 70/202 Research Associates 35% 20/31 Administration 65% 18/40 Technical 45%

  3. Positive Outcomes • Treated with respect? • Good cooperation within groups? Intellectually stimulated by work environment? • Motivated to do my job well?

  4. Areas that need to be addressed • Sufficiently involved in departmental decisions that affect me? • Good research • linkage between groups? • Training and Development • Opportunities • Sufficiently informed about • promotion, increments and bonus • reviews?

  5. Areas specific to particular job roles Technical staff: • Feel their achievements are not recognised • Feel removed from the departmental decision making processes • Raise concerns about the speed with which health and safely issues are dealt with • Actions: • Work on producing a web site on the workshop achievements • Include work shop projects in the annual Review • Technical staff to report at Staff Meetings • Safety Issues will obviously be looked into in more detail

  6. Areas specific to particular job roles Research staff: • Would like training in people, project and resource management • Would like to see a more formal mentoring process in place Feel removed from departmental decision making processes • Do not express strong support for the PDRP • Actions • Formation of the Departmental RA committee who will report to HoGs • Appointment of RAs on the Juno committee • Specific training to be identified and arranged through HR for departmental RAs

  7. Areas specific to particular job roles Administrative Staff: • Would like more training in interpersonal communication • Would like to see a more formal mentoring process in place for admin staff • Actions • Setting up training • Setting up mentoring scheme

  8. Areas specific to particular job roles Academic staff: • Would like training in leadership and people management • Would like to see a more formal mentoring process in place • Would like to be better informed about Faculty finances • Not fully aware of the promotion process • Do not use the web to stay informed Actions Set up training Set up mentoring Make sure the promotion process is better publicised Send emails when new material is posted to web sites

  9. General suggested follow up actions • Representatives from each staff group (RA, Tech and Admin) to attend staff meetings to enhance communication and involvement in departmental matters. • Organisation of HR staff development training courses specific to departmental groups • Mentoring scheme to be developed with wide consultation across the department.

More Related