1 / 32

Chap 11 SWITCHING CIRCUITS

Chap 11 SWITCHING CIRCUITS. BY: PRIYANK SHAH PARIN SHAH. INTRODUCTION.

tamah
Télécharger la présentation

Chap 11 SWITCHING CIRCUITS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chap 11SWITCHING CIRCUITS BY: PRIYANK SHAH PARIN SHAH

  2. INTRODUCTION • A Constituent Electric Circuit which receives, stores or manipulates information in coded form to accomplish the specified objective of the system is known as the Switching Circuit. • Switching Circuits performance can be presented as truth tables. They are two valued attributes where condition attribute represent input variable and decision attribute represent output variables.

  3. MINIMIZATION OF PARTIAL DEFINED SWITCHING FUNCTIONS • Applying rough set philosophy to switching function minimization, • Considering this input a,b,c,d and e from the switching circuit as condition attributes an d output f as the decision attribute. ab c f d e

  4. TABLE FOR MINIMIZATION

  5. MINIMIZATION OF TABLE • Combination of input variables not present in the table will never occur. • Table is consistent as combination of all input variable values are different, hence the corresponding switching functions is well defined. • Removing the variable a from the previous table we get the following table.

  6. Removing column a, we get

  7. Removing column b we get:

  8. Removing Column c ,

  9. Removing column d, we get

  10. Removing column e we get,

  11. ANALYSIS OF TABLE • Variable c is superfluous in the definition of the switching . • Now combining the identical rules we get the following compact form of the table removing the column c.

  12. COMPACT FORM OF THE TABLE

  13. COMPUTE CORE VALUES

  14. We can observe from the table that the decision rules b1d0e0 f1 a1e0  f1 b1e1  f0 are reduced. Whereas remaining core values d0 not form reducts.

  15. MINIMAL SET OF DECISION RULES • Decision rules covering minimal set of all condition for each decision class are:: • | b1d0e0 | = {2,3,4,7} | a1e0 | = {4,5,6,7,9} • But Decision class “1” does not cover set {1,8}. • From table we find the missing rules are : |a0d1e1|={1} |b0d1e1|={1,8} |a0b0e1|={1} |a1b0d1|={8,9}

  16. MINIMAL SOLUTION • Thus the 3 minimal solution are : • b1d0e0 V a1e0 V a0d1e1  f1 • b1d0e0 V a1e0 V b0d1e1 V a1b0d1  f1 • B1d0e0 V a1e0 V a0b0e1 V a1b0d1  f1

  17. The solution can be written in more convenient form • bd’e’ V ae’ V a’def Where x and x’ denotes variables without and with negation respectively. The corresponding switching circuits can be easily implemented using “and” , “or” and “not” gates.

  18. MULTIPLE-OUTPUT SWITCHING FUNCTION • Synthesis of the multiple output switching function by treating the this kind of functions as single set of output functions and applying the procedures used previously. • Considering this input - a , b , c and d from the switching circuit as condition attributes and output - e and f as the decision attribute. a b e c f d

  19. TABLE FOR MINIMIZATION

  20. REPLACE DECISION ATTRIBUTE BY SINGLE FOUR VALUED VARIABLE Y.

  21. GROUP AND REMUNERATE ROWS OF THE TABLE W.R.T. OUTPUT VARIABLE

  22. COMPUTE Y REDUCTS OF INPUT VARIABLE: REMOVING I/P VARIABLE a

  23. COMPUTE Y REDUCTS OF INPUT VARIABLE: REMOVING I/P VARIABLE b

  24. COMPUTE Y REDUCTS OF INPUT VARIABLE: REMOVING I/P VARIABLE c

  25. COMPUTE Y REDUCTS OF INPUT VARIABLE: REMOVING I/P VARIABLE d

  26. COMPUTE CORE VALUES

  27. REDUCT VALUE TABLE

  28. REDUCT VALUE TABLE

  29. MINIMAL SOLUTION

  30. EQUIVALENT DECISION ALGORITHM • The equivalent decision algorithm from the above minimal solutions are as follows :: 1.) a0b0d0  i 2.) aob1d1  i 3.) a1c1  ii 4.) a0b1d0  iii 5.) a1b0d0  iii 6.) b0c0d1  iv OR a0b0d0 V aob1d1  i a1c1  ii a0b1d0 V a1b0d0  iii bocod1  iv

  31. DECISION ALGORITHM IN BOOLEAN NOTATION • Representing the algorithm in boolean notation we get the following. Also by representing in this form it gives user with easy implementatio of the switching circuits using AND, OR and NOT gates. • a'b'd‘ i a'bd i ac  ii a'bd'  iii ab'd'  iii b'c'd iv OR a'b’d’ V a’bd i ac  ii a'bd’ V ab’d’  iii b'c’d iv

  32. THANK YOU

More Related