1 / 23

-measurements

-measurements. Saskia Mioduszewski. Martin Codrington. Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed. BNL 10-17-07. -measurements. +nucleus e - +e + +nucleus. e+nucleus e - ++nucleus.

tamas
Télécharger la présentation

-measurements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. -measurements Saskia Mioduszewski Martin Codrington Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-17-07

  2. -measurements +nucleus e-+e++nucleus e+nucleus e-++nucleus Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 Table of Contents: • Motivation • Single particle spectra • Jet-like azimuthal correlations •  in Spin physics • -measurements • Experimental Challenges • Experimental Technique • Previous -jet measurements at STAR • Preliminary Results of -triggered 2007 Data • -trigger in Run 2007 • Status and first look • Shower Shape Analysis • Comparison of shower shape in MC and Real data • Effect of BSMD saturation on shower shape analysis • Summary

  3. Motivation Why -measurements? Single Particle Spectra-RAA? Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 p+p  jet+jet Au+Au ??? • QCD is written in terms of q&g degrees of freedom! • Study FF from ee+ collisions and PDF from pp collisions! • PDF in nuclear environment !FF in medium! • NLO pQCD agrees with RHIC measurements for high pt particles at mid-rapidity. • Nuclear modification factor: • How to compare AA to pp?

  4. Motivation Why -jet measurements? Single Particle Spectra-RAA Mid-rapidity Statistical Method Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 <E>  sCxqL “Static medium” • Heavy quarks suppress as much as light quarks in the medium. • No reduction is “as expected” observed in the baryon/meson ratio as in the gluon dominance picture. Forms of energy loss, s(T)? • RAA exhibits only very limited sensitivity to the properties of the medium. • More differential observable is needed.

  5. Motivation Why -jet measurements? Jet-like azimuthal correlations ? Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 • Near-side: p+p, d+Au, Au+Au is similar. • Back-to-back: Au+Au strongly suppressed relative to p+p and d+Au. Suppression of the back-to-back correlation in central Au+Au is a final-state effect • Surface bias for the trigger particle. • Trigger particle with no surface bias is required for better calibration of the away-side jet.

  6. Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 Motivation Why -jet measurements?Spin Physics • p+p gluon density • Direct photons have the gluon distribution information

  7. Motivation Why -jet measurements? Summary Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 Four multipurpose experiments (BRAHMS, PHENIX, PHOBOS, STAR) • Empirical lines of evidence: Energy density well beyond critical value. Large elliptic flow. Jet quenching. dAu control experiment. • Interpreted in terms of a strongly coupled QGP and a new QCD state (?) Color Glass Condensate Required: • Better understanding for the energy loss mechanism! • Direct Photons: Doesn’t couple to the medium. • QGP thermal photons. • Elliptic flow. • Test for binary scaling for hard process. -jet measurements • Gamma-charged hadrons correlation. • Challengeable measurements!

  8. schematic view thermal: Decay photons hard: Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 Motivation Why -jet measurements?LODirect photons direct component Bremsstrahlung fragmentation component • Gamma-charged hadrons correlation. • Calibrated probe of the QGP – at LO. • No Surface Bias • Hard process • Possible discriminator for quark/gluon jet at LO.

  9. Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 Motivation Why -jet measurements?Spin Physics -jet measurements on statistical basis Inclusive -jet correlation function 0-jet (h-jet) correlation function direct-jet = iclusive-jet-decay-jet “taking into account decay kinematics”.

  10. Experimental Challenges Is it possible to measure? Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 In medium: • 0–spectra are suppressed by a factor of ~5 relative to the scaled p+p collisions. • The away-side in di-jet production is more suppressed. Pythia v6.131 event generator pp-collisions at √s=200 GeV, |η|<1 (STAR acceptance) • Background sources of direct photons suppressed in medium.

  11. Experimental Challenges Is it possible to measure? Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 Inclusive g-jet in Au+Au at s=200GeV SIMULATION (pp) p0 simulation STAR Preliminary Thomas Dietel Quark Matter 2005 photon simulation • Simulation shows no associated particles in -charged correlation. • Away-side decreases with increasing centrality. • Decrease in near-side due to the increased fraction of prompt photons. • Need /0 discrimination.

  12. Experimental Challenges Is it possible to measure? Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 S. Chattopadhyay Quark Matter 2006 p0Bin • Reduction in near angle peak towards photon Bin. • Effect is more prominent for larger Ettrigger . Mixed g Bin More discrimination power is needed in the high multiplicity system

  13. Experimental Challenges Is it possible to measure? -plane -plane Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 0 DECAY KINEMATICS min= 2 Sin –1 (mInv /E),  ~10-17 s Towers (~0.05x~0.05), Strips (~0.007x~0.007), d ~2.2m at =0, l~2.93m. Opening angle(rad) • Electromagnetic transverse shower characteristics • High energy core. • Low energy halo. 0’s pT(GeV/c)

  14. L2 Gamma Trigger in Run 2007 Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 • Tower threshold ET=5.76 [GeV] • Cluster threshold ET= 7.44 [GeV] • Cluster size is one or two tower. L2gammaResult Contains: phi_bin,eta_bin, tower ET, and Cluster ET. ~1.2M events. ~50% Reversed Full Field. http://online.star.bnl.gov/L2gamma2007/l2gamma2007_bemc/ All runs after 8143* are in the reversed full field configuration.

  15. Preliminary QA of -trigger Data- BEMC Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07

  16. Preliminary QA of -trigger Data- BSMD saturation Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07

  17. Showers shape Analysis Real data vs. Single particle simulation Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 pp@2006 Shower shape is wider in real data than in simulation!

  18. Shower Shape Analysis Real data vs. pythia Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 Saturation parameters-Eta/Phi [700,70,10] • Pythia doesn’t reproduce the shower • shape even with saturation! • In phi-plane the shower shape is • closer to the real data than in eta.

  19. Shower Shape Analysis 0 vs. electron Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 Saturation parameters-Eta/Phi [700,70,10]

  20. Shower Shape Analysis 0 vs. electron Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07

  21. Michael Betancourt

  22. 75% eff @ 75% rejection Single thrown γ and π0 Pibero Djawotho

  23. Summary Texas A&M Group Ahmed M. Hamed BNL 10-19-07 • -jet measurements are very promising tool for better understanding of • the medium. • Shower shape study is required for direct photons identification. • Promising study for transverse shower profile is undertaken. • Embedding request is still under processed.

More Related