1 / 19

NUMSA SUBMISSION ON MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT BILL [B15-2013]

NUMSA SUBMISSION ON MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT BILL [B15-2013]. Table of Contents Introduction 2. NUMSA‘s Position on the MPRD Amendment Bill [ B15 – 2013] 2.1 Ministerial Advisory Council 2.2 Fast Tracking Beneficiation 2.3 Environment

tamra
Télécharger la présentation

NUMSA SUBMISSION ON MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT BILL [B15-2013]

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NUMSA SUBMISSION ON MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT BILL [B15-2013]

  2. Table of Contents • Introduction 2. NUMSA‘s Position on the MPRD Amendment Bill [B15 – 2013] 2.1 Ministerial Advisory Council 2.2 Fast Tracking Beneficiation 2.3 Environment 2.4 Offences and Penalties 2.5 Guidelines: 2.5.1 Guideline for Consultation with Communities and Interested and Affected Parties 2.5.2 Social and Labour Plan 3. Conclusion References

  3. IntroductionAs NUMSA we have campaigned for more public ownership of our natural resources and argued that beneficiation of our minerals resources is important to sustain industrial growth and create employment. As a union that organises metalworkers in the energy, steel, engineering and associated industries like the motor and automobile sector NUMSA believes that the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development (MPRD) Amendment Bill will provide the necessary legislative framework to facilitate the implementation of strategies as outlined in the following government policy papers: • A Beneficiation Strategy for the Minerals Industry of South Africa (DMR) • The Broad-Based Socio-Economic Empowerment Charter for the South African Mining and Minerals Industry (DMR) • Industrial Policy Action Plan (DTI)

  4. 2. NUMSA’s position on the MPRD Amendment Bill [B15 – 2013] 2.1 Ministerial Advisory Council • Repeal of the sections 57-68 of the principal Act (Act 28 of 2002) that provides for the establishment of a Minerals and Mining Development Board and matters related to the functions, composition and administration of the board. • S56 Ministerial Advisory Council • S10 Regional Mining Development and Environmental Committee • S23 (2A) Granting and Duration of Mining Right – deletion of [including conditions requiring the participation of the community] from existing clause

  5. NUMSA notes Act provides for Guidelines for community participation, but exclusion of community and social formations from structures: • NUMSA believes that these exclusions will affect the credibility of the proposed new structures. Besides, such exclusions are likely to damage the spirit of transformation that the legislation seeks to address.

  6. 2.2 Fast Tracking Beneficiation (Amendment of section 26 of Act 28 of 2002, as amended by section 22 of Act 49of 2008) Figures released by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) suggest “that employment opportunities tend to be low at the milling i.e. refinery stage, but can become very high at the mass semi-manufacturing and final production and machine building stages” (Lundall et al. 2008: 8) The following table from the DTI illustrates the benefits of beneficiation: : Source: [DTI, cited in Lundall et al. 2008:9]

  7. The table clearly reflects the overall underdevelopment of the downstream metal products industries. In each column it indicates the percentage of a particular metal that reached the stage of beneficiation indicated by the column. For instance, 100 percent of gold mined in South Africa is refined (Stage 2), but only 2 percent is beneficiated into a final product (Stage 4) Source: [DTI, cited in Lundall et al. 2008: 9]

  8. Developing and growing the downstream higher value-added end of the metals production chain should therefore become a top priority. Great attention and emphasis would have to be given to the skills required to grow this stage of metals beneficiation. (Lundall et al. 2008: 9)The union is aware that there are other problems that hamper the development of downstream steel production: • import parity pricing (IPP) • electricity pricing • training and development

  9. However, recent developments from the DTI (in a report presented to the PC Trade and Industry on the 15 February 2013) confirm the department’s preference for amendments to S26 of the MPRDA to facilitate ‘access to minerals for local beneficiation’ (DTI: 2013). Briefly, these amendments seek to give the Minister the power to: • determine the percentage of a mineral resource that must be made available for local value addition • set a developmental price for the designated mineral/s • seek written consent from any person who intends to export designated minerals

  10. While NUMSA has advocated and lobbied for the introduction of export taxes on minerals leaving the country, the DTI believes that an amended S26 of the MPRDA will achieve the same effect and contribute significantly to enhance our domestic manufacturing sector. The union welcomes these amendments to S26, although its own policy position on beneficiation remains unchanged. NUMSA will be glad to furnish the PC on Committee Mineral Resources a copy of its internal discussion document entitled Towards a Metallic Minerals Beneficiation Strategy for South Africa, May 2012.

  11. 2.3 Environment NUMSA notes the amendment to S37 of the principal Act: All environmental requirements provided for by this Act will be implemented in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of1998) • Transfer of functions to NEMA • DMR – implementation • DEA – develop, review legislation /policy/ regulations [MPRD Amendment Bill, 2013: 41-42]

  12. In a press statement released by Adv. De Lange (Chairperson of the PC on Water and Environmental Affairs) on the 13 August 2013 the Department of Environmental Affairs has released a National Environmental Management Laws Amendment Bill, [B26 -2013] that ‘proposes amendments to certain provisions under the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (NEMA), the National Environmental Management: Waste Act, 2008 (NEM: WA) and the National Environmental Management Amendment Act, 2008 (NEMAA)’ (De Lange, 2013). According to De Lange, the amended NEMA Bill (B26 – 2013] will: … give effect to the “One Environmental System” by empowering the Minister of Mineral Resources to implement environmental matters in terms of NEMA in so far as it relates to prospecting, mining, exploration, production or related activities on a prospecting, mining, exploration or production area. The Bill further proposes amendments to the NEM: WA to allow the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs to develop regulations on the environmental management of residue deposits and stockpiles for implementation by the Minister of Mineral Resources.

  13. Since amendments to NEMA are directly related to amendments in the MPRD Amendment Bill, NUMSA believes that there should be a joint sitting of the PC Mineral Resources and the PC Water and Environmental Affairs to ensure that both pieces of legislation are consistent in their application: • Ensure that transitional arrangements and commencement date are unambiguous • The DMR has the necessary capacity to implement environmental impact management as well as compliancemonitoring and enforcement provisions under NEMA.

  14. 2.4 Amendments to S98 (Offences) and S99 (Penalties) • NUMSA notes the amendments to S98 (Offences) and S99 (Penalties).The union welcomes these changes. However we are of the view that the fine imposed for contravention of S98 (a) (i) by the insertion of S99 1A is inadequate: • (1A) Should it for any reason whatsoever not be possible to establish the recent annual turnover of any offender as contemplated in section 99(1) with any reasonable certainty or without undue delay, any person convicted of an offence in terms of this act shall then be liable — • in the case of an offence referred to in section 98(a)(i), to a fine not exceeding R180 000 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding four years or to both such fine and such imprisonment; • Further, NUMSA believes that the Minister should open a ‘name and shame’ register for all offenders convicted of contravening the provisions as set out in S98 and withdraw any such license or permit granted to such person/s in terms of this legislation.

  15. 2.5 Guidelines 2.5.1 Guideline for Consultation with Communities and Interested and Affected Parties NUMSA is aware that the Act provides for Guidelines for Consultation with Communities and Interested and Affected Parties. However, a recent article that appeared in the Mail & Guardian (30 August 2013) highlights the problems of communities traumatized by mining operations and coerced into giving up their land: Prospecting for one of the world's largest platinum mines has already taken farming land from a Limpopo community. One morning he woke up and walked the few kilometres to the field he had farmed for decades and found a fence had been built around it. Security guards told him to go away. The community's farmlands had become a slimes dam for one of the world's biggest platinum mines … Today the topsoil, and everything else, is covered with the white dust that blows off the mine. But this is an area with rich earth, where Mofokeng could grow anything from maize and morogo (wild spinach)to beans. Now the villagers have nowhere to farm. (M&G, 30 August 2013)

  16. NUMSA believes that legislation should be aligned with the ILO Convention 169 Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989. South Africa is not a signatory to this Convention and to date 22 countries have ratified C169. Apart from its commitment to human and socio-economic rights, Article 6 of the Convention provides a framework for governments to consult in a meaningful way: 1. In applying the provisions of this Convention, governments shall: (a) consult the peoples concerned, through appropriate procedures and in particular through their representative institutions, whenever consideration is being given to legislative or administrative measures which may affect them directly; (b) establish means by which these peoples can freely participate, to at least the same extent as other sectors of the population, at all levels of decision-making in elective institutions and administrative and other bodies responsible for policies and programmes which concern them; (c) establish means for the full development of these peoples' own institutions and initiatives, and in appropriate cases provide the resources necessary for this purpose. 2. The consultations carried out in application of this Convention shall be undertaken, in good faith and in a form appropriate to the circumstances, with the objective of achieving agreement or consent to the proposed measures. (ILO, Convention 169)

  17. 2.5.2 Social Labour Plan … it is questionable whether measures to monitor and enforce compliance with the SLP are adequate., or have been sufficiently provided for in the MPRD Act. NUMSA believes that DMR should take the following steps to address the issue: • A overarching policy paper for the mining and petroleum sector should be developed to guide the Minister in the execution of his or her mandate to transform the sector and address the needs of historically disadvantaged persons • Closer alignment between the SLP, Mining Charter, Beneficiation Strategy and IPAP • Consider imposing sanctions on companies that fail to meet the objectives as directed by legislation

  18. 3. Conclusion NUMSA believes that the political and socio-economic transformation of our society is necessary to ensure that all South Africans benefit from our abundant reserves of natural resources. As the MPRD Amendment Bill seeks to address these inequalities we are mindful of the fact that ownership patterns of our natural resources are skewed and lie in the hands of big multi-national companies that continue to exploit our natural resources while the majority of our people live in poverty and hardship. The union will continue to campaign for more collective ownership of our natural resources under state ownership so that the fruits of beneficiation are enjoyed by all.

  19. References • De Lange, J (MP PC Water and Environmental Affairs) (13 August 2013) Strengthening institutional arrangements and planning matters for the management of environmental matters in terms of the National Environmental Management Act in so far as it relates to prospecting, mining, exploration or production or related activities. Parliament invites you to comment on the National Environmental Management Laws Amendment Bill, 2013 [Press Statement], viewed 03 September 2013, [Online] Available http://www.pmg.org.za/calls-for-comment/national-environmental-management-amendment-laws-bill-2013 • DMR, 2013 MPRD Amendment Bill [B15 – 2013], viewed 03 September 2013 [Online] Available http://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/MPDA-Amendment-Bill-B15-2013-mineral-and-petroleum-resources-development.pdf • DTI, 2013 Summary Report of the Intra-Departmental Task Team on Iron and Steel (IDTT) [Powerpoint Slides] Industrial Development Policy Division, DTI. Presented to the Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry, 15 February 2013, viewed 02 September 2013, [Online] Available http://www.thedti.gov.za/parliament/iron-ore_and_steel.pdf • ILO C169 - Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169), viewed 02 September 2013, [Online] Available http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312314:NO • Lundall, P, Maree, J and Godfrey, S 2008 Industrial Structure and Skills in the Metals Beneficiation Sector of South Africa, Labour and Enterprise Policy Research Group University of Cape Town, viewed 29 August 2013, http://www.labour.gov.za/DOL/downloads/documents/research-documents/Metals%20Benification_DoL_Report.pdf

More Related