1 / 26

Changing Beliefs and Knowledge of Child Care Providers: The Ounce Research Project

Changing Beliefs and Knowledge of Child Care Providers: The Ounce Research Project. Amy Susman-Stillman, Michelle Englund, Jessica Pleuss , Jennifer Cleveland, Anna Shkolnik Center for Early Education and Development University of Minnesota

tanith
Télécharger la présentation

Changing Beliefs and Knowledge of Child Care Providers: The Ounce Research Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Changing Beliefs and Knowledge of Child Care Providers:The Ounce Research Project Amy Susman-Stillman, Michelle Englund, Jessica Pleuss, Jennifer Cleveland, Anna Shkolnik Center for Early Education and Development University of Minnesota Human Capital Research Collaborative Mini-Conference: Promoting Child Health and Well-Being April 27, 2009

  2. Acknowledgements • Ounce Research Project Staff • Minnesota Ounce Child Care Project • Community data collectors • Infant and toddler child care providers, children and parents • McKnight Foundation • Greater Twin Cities United Way • Samuel Meisels Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  3. Outline of Presentation • Background • Research Questions • Sample, Method and Measures • Findings • Conclusions • Practice and Policy Relevance Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  4. Background • Poor quality of care for infants and toddlers • Press for accountability in early childhood field • Trends in professional development • Minnesota context Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  5. Research Questions • How does using the Ounce Scale affect: • caregiver and parent knowledge of child development • caregivers’ attitudes about child development • parent-provider relationships • provider-child relationships • providers’ everyday practice with children Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  6. Research Questions • To what extent was the training protocol implemented with fidelity? • What factors might affect the degree of success or the degree of change? • trainer-provider relationship • characteristics of the trainer • characteristics of the provider Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  7. Parent Qualities attitudes understanding knowledge practice demographics Change in Parent Qualities attitudes understanding knowledge practice Informal Ounce Training from Provider Parent Fidelity to Ounce Scale Change in Parent-Provider Relationship Parent-Provider Relationship Provider Fidelity to Ounce Scale Provider Qualities attitudes understanding knowledge practice demographics Change in Provider Qualities attitudes understanding knowledge practice Ounce Training from Trainer & Follow-up contacts Provider-Trainer Relationship Provider-Child Relationship Change in Provider-Child Relationship Child Qualities age temperament Trainer Qualities attitudes understanding knowledge demographics Logic Model—Impact on Provider Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  8. Study Sample and Design • Sample size • N= 122; 65 Ounce and 57 Control • Attrition= 98 providers; 45 Ounce, 53 Control • Random assignment • Ounce providers participated in Ounce training for 6 months and follow-up for 6 months • Pre-post-post design (T1/T2/T3) Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  9. Training—Learning to Use Ounce • Year-long use • 6 months of training to learn and practice • 6 months of regular follow-up • Regular contract with trainers (intensity) • 1-2 children Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  10. Measures for Providers • Knowledge of Infant-Toddler Development • Attitudes About Caregiving • Beliefs About Child Rearing • Perceptions of Own Caregiving • Parent-Provider Relationships • Ounce Implementation Questionnaires Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  11. Analytic Plan • Test for group differences at Time 1 to insure group equivalence. • Examine changes in beliefs and knowledge with repeated measures anovas over 3 time points as a function of intervention group and provider type (center or family). Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  12. Provider Demographics • N= 98 (1 male); 96 Caucasian • Age range: 21-65, median age of 37.5 • 80% married, living with spouse • Wide range of years providing care -1-46; median of 10 • Wide range of years at current setting – 1-30; median of 6.4 years Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  13. Provider Demographics • Very good to excellent health for 75%; 25% report good • 21% report depressive symptomatology • About 2/3 had either a BA or MA Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  14. Provider Demographics • About 1/4 were either taking early childhood or child development classes/participated in the TEACH program • 95% had taken some kind of infant-toddler training • Rates of attrition were similar between center and family providers Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  15. Findings Knowledge • Findings indicate intervention-control differences over time. Ounce providers, compared to control providers, increased their knowledge about infant and toddler development [F (1,63) = 3.76, p = .057]. Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  16. Findings—Beliefs about Discipline and Control Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  17. Findings—Value of Talking and Reading Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  18. Findings—Perceived Competence Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  19. Findings—Perceived Caregiving Skills Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  20. Findings—Perceived Caregiving Skills by Provider Type Family Providers Center-Based Providers Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  21. Findings: ImplementationFamily vs. Center (T2 and T3) • Family providers were significantly more likely than center providers to say using the Ounce Scale helped them: • recognize and understand normal typical child behaviors • learn the natural progression of skills development • individualize curriculum and design appropriate environment Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  22. Findings: ImplementationFamily vs. Center (T2 and T3) • Family providers were more likely to say they would regularly use the Ounce Scale with other children. • Family providers were less likely to indicate difficulty in finding time to implement the Ounce Scale. Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  23. Provider Findings: Relationship with TrainerT2 & T3 (Family vs. Center) • Family providers: • are more comfortable sharing their Ounce-related experiences and ideas with their trainer (T2) • felt that their trainer welcomed their ideas and questions (T2) • had better relationships with their trainers than center providers (T2) • were more likely to receive telephone contact from their trainers (T3) • Center providers more likely to feel nervous or uncomfortable prior to or during interactions with their trainers (T2) Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  24. Provider Findings: Relationship with Trainer T2 & T3 (Family vs. Center) • Provider reports (N= 34; Ounce center providers N= 10; Ounce family providers N = 24) of their experiences with their trainers varied by provider type. • Center providers reported a less intensive experience with their trainers. Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  25. Conclusions • The Ounce Scale can positively affect the knowledge and beliefs of infant and toddler child care providers. • Ounce was favorably received by providers. Providers did report less confidence on how to smoothly incorporate Ounce into their schedules. Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

  26. Conclusions • Center and family providers also showed differences in their approach to Ounce. Further work is needed to understand more about the particular barriers to, and differences in, implementation in both center and family child care settings. • Along with the randomized design, this study was strengthened by its gathering of implementation and fidelity data. Susman-Stillman, et al, 2009

More Related